MovieChat Forums > 30 Minutes or Less (2011) Discussion > Wow this was a short movie!

Wow this was a short movie!

posted 13 years ago by Vashramana
9 replies | jump to latest

I started watching it at 10:30 and it was over at 11:45. It says it has an 83 minute run-time, but that must include the end credits.

[–] CaeserOct0 13 years ago

I thought it was too long. It should have been...30 minutes or less!

==================================
http://www.cafepress.com/vmans_shop
http://www.remotelogisticsinternational.com/

[–] Vashramana 13 years ago

Meh it was a decent film. Nothing to write home about, but it wasn't terrible.

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Dustbowler 11 years ago

Official running time always includes the credits.

Who says violence is not the answer?

[–] clickbait 11 years ago

piece of *beep* movies usually are very short...no exception here.

[–] Vashramana 11 years ago

I have seen some very long movies that were worse than this, while I have also seen some very short movies that were great.

[–] Tez20 10 years ago

I liked the length of the movie. There are too many movies these days that have a longer than needed run time in all genres. I often find myself thinking that a movie I just watched would have been better if it was 20-30 minutes shorter than it was, but 30 Minutes or Less was right on the money.

[–] Xcalat3 10 years ago

not really, i think it was the right length good they didn't add any melodrama to it and the pace was very good as well.

Libera te tu temet ex inferis.
pro ego sum diabolus, pro ego sum nex.

[–] HarlemEagle42 (18433) 2 years ago

More movies should be like that.