MovieChat Forums > 30 Minutes or Less (2011) Discussion > Why do people keep saying that the real-...

Why do people keep saying that the real-life victim was in on it?

posted 12 years ago by padzok
9 replies | jump to latest

As far as I can tell, the police have no evidence at all that the real Brian Wells was a willing accomplice.

Just because the actual kidnappers claim that he was a co-conspirator, why should anybody believe them? Obviously they have an incentive to lie to make their own crimes seem (slightly) less.

And the evidence points to the fact that a call-out was made to a pizza company, and a delivery guy turned up, and then there was a struggle.

Isnt it far more likely that the pure guy was an innocent dupe rather than a bizarre criminal?

.

[–] PancakeConnoisseur 12 years ago

The fact that Brian Wells was weirdly calm in the bank a for the first 23 minutes with that cops. Then nervous when the collar bomb started beeping. Is directly inline with the story that Brian Wells was a co-conspirator but thought the bomb was fake but was backstabbed by his accomplices.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] tribalmaggot 11 years ago

Allegedly he knew the bomb was real before it was strapped to him.

[–] tab1969 (92) 7 years ago

After watching Evil Genuis on netflix. I dont believe for one second that he had anything to do with it. Its a shame what was done to him.

[–] MIchiganJFrogg (-35) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] tab1969 (92) 7 years ago

Check it out. It has a lot of good footage on it. I felt really sorry for the guy.

[–] MIchiganJFrogg (-35) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] beancrisp (1746) 4 years ago

FACT: You even entertaining the possibility that he was in on it proves you are incapable of logical thinking. Prove me wrong.

[–] Wallabee_Champ 8 years ago

Because of the phenomenon of blaming the victim. It's a real thing.