MovieChat Forums > J. Edgar (2011) Discussion > I thought DiCaprio was in that movie?

I thought DiCaprio was in that movie?


There's obviously some kind of feud between the Academy Awards and DiCaprio.

I have hated DiCaprio like every other guy my age for Titanic and Romeo & Juliet. Gawd, I nearly died of boredom in the theatre watching, or rather fighting through, Titanic, while the girls I was with cried like the Niagara Falls in spring. And, of course, pointed out, that if Kate Winslet weren't so chubby the both of them would have room on that piece of wood.

Anyway, since The Departed, DiCaprios acting has become more and more exceptional. J.Edgar is definitely the best so far.

As I said in the topic title, DiCaprio is not starring in this picture. J. Edgar Hoover is. The way DiCaprio melts into his character is sheer fantastic. The old Hoover bares not the slightest resemblance to the DiCaprio we see on the red carpet. The young Hoover is so much different from, say, DiCaprio in Shutter Island, that it could well be two different actors.

I know there are the haters who never got over Titanic. Or Romeo and Juliet. Still, binding DiCaprio to these roles is like binding Clint Eastwood to spaghetti western.

And I honestly think, those haters are very much present in the Oscars committee. But when even Roger Ebert praises this movie and DiCaprios performance, it is really time for people to grow up, forget Titanic and focus on DiCaprios acting in the last decade. Which is impeccable.

reply

Are you aware that both movies were nominated for Academy Awards, and that Titanic won 11? Why would they not nominate him for being in movies that actually were nominated? You're not making any sense.

reply

I didn't know that Titanic was nominated for Oscars last year.
Oh, 1997 you say?
When Clinton was President, Ghadafi ruled Libya and Osama was a nobody?
Don't you think the Academy Awards committee changed as well?
Or do you believe that Oscar himself hands out the nominations? No?
Well then, you don't make any sense.

reply

I cant believe this mess of a movie is even in the running for awards.

Insert @V@T@R

reply

Osama was a somebody... He freaking served in the U.S. Military in the 80s.

reply

[deleted]

The OP didn't have too many sentences that made any sense. Titanic was a good flick. This movie was a dripping gooey pipedream (especially the end) from a Director that's made some great films. This movie had it's rare moments, but I found myself laughing out loud at the movie making several times especially the make-up. However, it does carry some relevance at least from a historic viewpoint. I did find the movie very entertaining however, but sometimes for all the wrong reasons. As for DeCaprio...since that was the OP's subject matter, he's falling into a heavy character repetitive rut; and it's getting hard to watch. I like him better in roles where he plays a more realistic character like 'Body of Lies", 'The Departed" and "The Beach". I'm sure there's plenty of good things yet to come from this young talented actor.

reply

Really? You think Oscars are the mark of a great or even just a good film? Are you truly that naive? Titanic was a real shocker and the best comment I ever heard was in The Sopranos 'call me when the rich people start dying.'

reply

I really don't think the academy is filled with haters. I think that Dicaprio is a one note actor and while the public refuses to see it, the academy sees it every year. Why do you think that even Spielberg doesn't win a lot of directing oscars though everyone seems to love his movies? Because he's missing what truly great directors need to win oscars. He wasn't even nominated for director this year. And this is the case for Dicaprio and his high school drama acting style.

reply

It's obnoxious how love it or hate it people place dicaprios acting. He's not the best to ever grace the screen but he is by no means a "highschool drama style acting" actor. He's definitely superior to alot of actors working today with his raw emotion acting style. It's mind bobbling the amount of subtle things he does that go overlooked by the casual movie goers.

I am you and what I see is me.

reply

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! You are trolling right? You have to be. Spielberg has won 3 Oscars! Most directors don't even get 1 in a lifetime and the man has 3 on his mantle with many years of movie making left. WTF are you talking about? The man is one of the most talented directors of all time. Hitchcock, arguably the greatest director in history, was only nominated once and never won an Oscar!!!!! You are full of it. As for DiCaprio, he is one of the better actors of our generation as well, he himself has been nominated several times for the Oscar and will win one day. Why is no one mentioning Catch me if you Can? That is my favorite DiCaprio movie and one of his best acting jobs. Anyway I had to comment on this, your statement about Spielberg not winning a lot of Oscars was completely wrong.

When the hero becomes the villian....who becames the hero?

reply


I LOVED him in The Aviator.

reply

Hitchcock was nominated five times.

----------------------
http://mulhollandcinelog.wordpress.com/

reply

That's three 'great' American personalities Di Caprio has portrayed: J Edgar, Howard Hughes, and Frank Abagnale Jr. - that's some legacy.

:-) canuckteach (--:

reply

That's three 'great' American personalities Di Caprio has portrayed: J Edgar, Howard Hughes, and Frank Abagnale Jr. - that's some legacy.


And they could have all been blended into one person "Leonardo Dicaprio"

reply

DiCaprio is a "one note actor"? Really?! I believe most people would say the exact opposite.
Gawd! "What's eating Gilbert grape", "The Basketball Diaries", "Catch me if you Can", "The Departed", "Shutter Island": they're all completely different characters and Leo is extremely convincing in all of them.
Sometimes I just catch myself in twilight-zone-type situations. This is definitely one of them...

reply

Where is the like button on this comment! :) GiovanaSamara, I fully agree.

reply

Hey Creepsville, Your moniker is well chosen: you come indeed from a city of creeps. Your trolling is among the most bizarrely crooked and disinforming piece of c**p I've come to read on this forum lately. You may be entitled to your opinion that DiCaprio plays on a monotonous register of expression, notwithstanding the fact that his intensity and charisma make him blast up the screen every time we see him. His presence is as mesmerizing as suddenly watching the sun with our naked eyes... But, but... you are out of your mind when you mention Spielberg's achievements in cinema. Not only have you been plainly moronic to the point of omitting to check beyond your prejudiced mind about his share of Oscars, miserable troglodyte, but you go on and on about equating Oscar harvesting and excellence in film direction. By doing so, you are revealing how ignorant and reactionary you really are ! People have rightfully mentioned Hitchcock, but the Venn's diagram showing the intercept between the list of the best directors and that of Oscars amounts to almost nothing.

So much Hollywood horses**t mars the list of the annual Academy awards to Best Movies that any educated person knows about the inefficiency of the Academy in picking up the Best of the best. Cinema 101, troll!! I mean, who cares a penny for Crash, Chicago, Shakespeare in Love in competitions that selected nominees an order of magnitude better than those ones, just to name 3 cases that come to mind? Slumdog Millionaire? The English Patient? Out of Africa? Just moe examples of movies that, while not too shabby, rank nonetheless much lower than contenders on the years that won the Oscar for Best Picture. One word: politics, or more exactly 2 words: political correctness.

No wonder you are missing the point here about DiCaprio and this movie... creep!

reply

As a girl fan of Leo who can't stand Titanic it means so much to hear you say this! When I say that I am a fan they always think I like Titanic and Romeo and Juliet, when I don't like either of them. I think he is a fantastic actor and that is the reason, and I wish people would wake up and stop associating him with all of that- it's either they love him or they hate him for it. It's nice to see guys who are Leo fans because maybe then people will see that he's not just the heartthrob he was 15 years ago. You'd think Academy members would be smart enough to see that on their own, but apparently not. Again, thank you!

reply

I don't seem to understand what is exactly the problem in beeing male and liking Titanic (or being female and not liking it). Are you 15? Was it not a great love story, a great drama, a great movie? Sure, as a male i was annoyed too from the whining girls around me, but i must say i was still very impressed by the movie at that time.

I like DiCaprio very much as an actor, he has been a very very good actor ever since the early 90's in "What's eating Gilbert Grape".

reply

I agree with you, I don't think he was bad in "Titanic", his acting was good. People just tend to make fun of "Titanic" and rest the value it had when it came out. Sure, the love story is cheesy, but still, it was entertaining and that's what movies are all about.

reply

There's no "feud" whatsoever. Dicraprio sucks and everyone knows it except for obsessed fangirls.

reply

Just LOL at the post above me. I love when people speak in absolutes as if their opinion is the end all be all of a discussion on something. I'd imagine the industries top dogs would disagree with you bud.

I am you and what I see is me.

reply

Just LOL at the post above me. I love when people speak about "top dogs" and "industries" (nice spelling) as if they are an "insider" (as if their "imagining" is an "end all be all of a discussion").

Just admit that you cherry-pick "opinions" that differ from yours. You couldn't care less, and have never critiqued a positive review of Dicraprio laced with "absolutes". You are a hypocritical fraud.

reply

You don't even know what you just said, and neither could you possibly know anything about my character. Please stfu, your opinion isn't credible.

I am you and what I see is me.

reply

You were exposed by your own words and hypocrisy. You embarrassed yourself, kid.

And no, I won't "stfu", because I enjoy exposing idiots like you. Go cry somewhere else.

reply

Take this axe, expose him. I'm glad you honestly think you're exposing something on a movie database website, get over yourself please. You are nothing, nothing at all and neither am I. The fact that we are even arguing is absolutely stupid, but I can live with the fact that i'm not the most pathetic. Know why? Because you initiated it. Don't worry, i'm sure your tombstone will read the lies that your body couldn't uphold while you were alive.

I am you and what I see is me.

reply

Again, stop crying and playing the victim. I commented about a celeb. Then you decided to make a fool of yourself over it. End of story.

reply

Nope, sorry. The story ended about 8 hours prior to your last post.

I am you and what I see is me.

reply

The truth of the matter is that DiCaprio has come a long way since Titanic. And he hasn't got worse he has got dramatically better. The Aviator was the first movie in which I forgot I was watching him. What's Eating Gilbert Grape was his first nomination, Aviator was his second, I believe Blood Diamond was his 3rd and that is it. He hasn't been nominated that many times. Blood Diamond was the second and I thought he really shined in Revolutionary Road. He is more memorable than Kate Winslet was in the movie. She was great but that movie was DiCaprio's not hers. Just my opinion. The Departed was another great film where his performance was great.

Leonardo DiCaprio gets better and better every year and is never happy with any of his performances in his films and has stated this in more than one interview. He says if he was ever happy it would be time to stop. He always wants to do better with every film never the same and definitely not worse.

reply

Exactly why is everyone knocking titanic! it is the movie that launched him! we know who he is because of this movie.. not to say his acting doesn't speak for itself, or that he couldn't have done a different movie and recieved the same fame, but it just so happens it was Titanic. for all u haters out there, titanic was one of the best movies of its time, FINANCIALLY speaking... it raked in 11 oscars, as well as other awards, and was the highest grossing movie of all time, only to be surpassed by another movie by its own director!! it is also based on one of the most interesting shipwrecks of modern times!(of which the Titanic's 100 year anniversary will be this year Apr. 14th, oddly enough around the same time, Titanic will be on the big screen AGAIN in 3-d.... only this movie would be put into theaters again after 15ish years) He was smart to take this role, and only seems to get better at his craft as he ages! he will be one of the greats!! people will continue recognizing his name for many many years to come! I enjoyed him honing his craft as I watched as i grew up... lets not forget his role in "what's eating gilbert grape", catch me if you can, man in the iron mask,revolutionary road, and inception.. he seems to do well with historical charecters as well as being great at voicing certain styles (accents) and even adapting his body to certain ... infirmities...(special ed.. gilbert grape). I will always be a fan of his, and his movies! I will always love Titanic, no matter who makes fun of me! It is a movie i fell in love with at the age of 10, and will always remember leo as my first celeb crush lol... and I will be the HUGE dork at the movies on April 14th, at the latest showing of Titanic, with my heart of the ocean necklace proudly around my neck, ready for a good cry and some nostalgic memory!

reply

now now children

reply

I think he got a lot better since Titanic, well he was already good in Basketball Diaries, he might not be what you call a top actor like Dustin Hoffman for example but he is getting close.I just can't see how people say that he is one note or that he is mediocre, i don't agree at all with that but i do accept the opinion.In my opinion he is indeed a great actor.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

^ Yeah, agree with this. He's okay as the generic personality actor when you need an A-lister to bankroll a film, but in all of his Oscar-bait films from the last 10 years he just tries too hard.

reply

Lily and Xume, it sounds like you both prefer method acting. I'm partial to more dramatic acting, and Leonardo does a great job in my book. But it may truly just be a preference for a particular acting style.

reply

Your argument fell through when you mentioned Russell Crowe along the lines of Daniel Day-Lewis and Gary Oldman.

reply

I know your post is from a month and a half ago, but you deserve to be absolutely b*tch slapped for calling Kate Winslet "chubby" in Titanic. People like you are the reason so many women have such low self esteem. I can't fathom how big of a jackass someone would have to be to talk like that, to a girl, on date. You're pathetic.

reply

rofl

I didn't call her fat, just chubby. And she was. And if women have low self esteem because I call Kate Winslet chubby, well, there's always the shrink.

Really, I know the yanks are pretty apologetic nowadays and it's always someone elses fault, but if you cry yourself into sleep because someone says your fat that only means you have a pretty weak personality. Don't blame other people, do something about it. Stop whining, for god's sake!

reply

Fact: This movie was kind of bland, heartless and boring... the performances were eh.

reply

I'm half way through the movie and find it fascinating!!! Acting great! Hoover was a very torn, complicated man.

reply