Love oliver stone. The three leads were unlikable to me and it was weird when she kept saying I love you guys. Wasn't buying into the whole two loves at once deal. Really grossed me out and made me root for the bad guys.
shareBut would you have been grossed out by the relationship of the three main characters if it had involved one guy and two girls?
shareI think it was the way it was presented that grossed me out. Love is love but the way they were presented to me was sticky and smelly. It was like waking up in the morning with an attractive person with really rank breath. The girl just didn't seem to be an especially exceptional intelligent person to me to. I mean just the way she was showed on screen. The dudes were smart and warrior like and she just seemed to spend their money and smoke their weed. And have sex with them close to the same time. I was just skeeved out and not buying it. Dirty people.
shareI guess you didn´t live through the 60´s and 70´s.
There were a lot of threesome relationships during those decades, in Europe anyway.
Not sure about North America as they seem to be more puritanical about sex, nudity etc.
The girl characterized here did seem very shallow. Poor little rich girl type with more money than brain.
I would have liked to see them all die at the end personally.
If it harms none, do what thou wilt.
[deleted]
For the record, there happens to be many of us who are North American that participate in more-somes.
It's not for everyone. But there is never a lull in action.
EDIT/ADDENDUM/ETC: To those who asked on my private line, thank you. My preference is FMF...then we can dismiss the M when we're done with him and go on to satisfy our own selfish, private, desires. MFM is okay, but sometimes guys don't know when to leave. The most raucous is FFF, especially if at least one is passive/submissive.
If all this is TMI, then don't ask me. Never ask a question when you can't handle the answer.
That is all...
No one cares.
share