MovieChat Forums > Frank (2014) Discussion > Twitter/Mental Illness

Twitter/Mental Illness


Was I the only person who felt that the entire film was about Twitter? I'm not saying the concept or even the original idea, but the way it plays out, especially in the final forty minutes, feels like it's entirely about life on twitter? I just felt that Twitter was always the anti-Facebook. It was the place where you went to be yourself and be recognized for it, but the reality is that it's become worse than Facebook. People make up a persona and become completely pigeon-holed into one genre or type and the only acceptance they feel is from the people they tried to separate themselves from in the first place.

Yes, I realize the movie is also about mental illness and wanting to be "normal." Normal in the sense that you can do what you love and have it accepted and appreciated without judgement. We all know that even when people with disabilities achieve greatness, we always add they are disabled. The irony in the movie is the most damaged is Clara, who is really the main character in so many ways, even down to her metaphorical instrument.

I must admit, that while I didn't enjoy the movie, I was fascinated by its layers. All which get bogged down by the fact that we know this is based on someone real, who I knew nothing about before and I know even less now. This brings me back to Twitter. Even those twitter handles I call friends are really strangers to me. I take at face value they are who they say they are, but as I've experienced, there are those who will privately ask you how your weekend was and then unfollow you because you didn't like the song they posted for you. Is that twitter, mental illness or both? Is it neither? I don't know, because unlike Facebook, there is no history between us.

I'm not sure when this was written, but I'm guessing the writer was very aware of the power of twitter. Not only as it's portrayed in the film, but also it's power to affect lives, both good and bad.

reply

I must have seen a different movie 😟😟😏😏....

reply

UHh the OP sure says a lot without saying much at all.


The kid was in his early 20's sure he USED twitter. I in no way thought it was a movie ABOUT twitter.

reply

It's just a modern movie incorporating modern things. It was vital to the story. Same with Chef.

reply

I think this movie was about many things, including Twitter and the vapid, sometimes dangerous, use of social media. It wasn't making a blanket statement against social media, though; only some of its users.

reply

It's interesting that the first three comments were about me saying nothing and questioning if I saw the same movie, but Lenny Abrahamson has stated (since I saw the movie and commented) that the movie was never intended on being about social media, until it was. He has said that the entire movie was to be narrated, but that's because it was written before Twitter was around. He used Twitter as a drug, because of it's ability to create a slight euphoria with each star, RT and comment. He also said, the similarities in Frank's head and that of a social media persona are not coincidental. Like I said in my OP, I know the movie was about other things, but it was definitely, purposely putting twitter at the forefront of the plot. I will be interested to see how this translates to the movie standing the test of time, since The Social Network almost feels obsolete these days.

reply

Yeah you got it.

Erik Lehnsherr: You want society to accept you, but you can't even accept yourself. 

reply