I like this movie, whos mad?

It's a very polarizing work for sure, but I thought it was a very beautiful film. Mainly the way it's shot, and especially the colors and framing of the angles. I thought it's a pretty natural companion piece to Drive, which I also loved. I think Drive is superior, but that this is still a well made movie.

The problem is that, like drive, it's about what's not said as much as what is. Lots of character motivations and thoughts are expressed through actions and facial expressions rather than expository dialogue, which is always refreshing to see...


'Get yourself a real dog. Any dog under 50 lbs is a cat and cats are pointless' - Ron Swanson

Its STRICTLY Visual. Its an homage to Kubrick, Noe and Kurosawa to an extent. The acting is weak, the story is basic but it has enough for Film Lovers to enjoy. Refn mixes genres in alot of his work, I just felt it wasn't strong here... I dont Love or Hate it... It just IS

Glad you liked Under the Skin OP, also glad it's being compared to this film. They are both a masterpiece in my eyes. There is hardly a film to come out these days that is mostly visually driven which both films did spectacularly.

I just watched A Girls Walks Alone At Night on Netflix and was made in a similar way. I highly recommend it.

Not mad. Loved this film too. It's not for everyone. Calling it terrible though? Hardly. Not your taste, would be a better description for someone that didn't enjoy this.