The film ended with a good twist that reminded me of the conclusion of The Ring. Some people aren't just misunderstood; they're simply evil to the core.
***************************** In heaven everything is fine.
In the book it's clear that Jennet had been haunting Alice ever since the death of Nathaniel many years before.
I haven't read the book, but it was made clear in the first version too. Remember when Arthur was listening to those wax recording rolls of Alice's?
That's right, now that you mention it, they never did say how Alice's husband died, so it probably was of old age. Judging by the state of the house, it looked like he'd died quite a while before she did.
reply share
I couldn't help but feel sorry for Alice, all alone in that decrepit house, as isolated as a house could be, living in one or two rooms, no friends, all of the people in the village probably hating her because of her sister, and on top of it, being haunted nightly by … *shudders* her.
The new sequel (not really recommended) said that Mr. Drablow fathered the child with Jennet. I think it implied that he had Jennet sent to the loony bin to cover it up, and took the child as his own with Alice.
The film ended with a good twist that reminded me of the conclusion of The Ring. Some people aren't just misunderstood; they're simply evil to the core.
No, on the contrary the scene actually diminishes the potency of her myth. As some of us know, the ending here is changed completely from the book, where she causes the deaths of Kipps's wife and child by startling a horse they're riding on causing it to run wild - the boy is instantly killed, and the mother dies later from her injuries . The whole point of her revenge is that she leaves the parents alive to suffer.