Two Houses?


I've seen the film three times and I always get confused about the houses. Neil and Marina seem to live, at different times throughout the movie, in two different houses and neighborhoods. Did I miss something? Or is this Malick playing loose with continuity? (I'm not counting the last house we see at the end of the film).

Anybody knows?

reply

I'm under the impression that he rents different houses while ultimately building his own. I think it's supposed to be thematic about the sort of transient way Neil lives his life before finally settling down.

reply

Interesting. Hadn't noticed he rented houses.

reply

I had the same question. Probably whatever filler material explained the transition between houses was cut and Malick just figured we'd figure it out.

reply

Well, it's not explicitly said he's "renting" but it's the only way I could explain why he'd move from house to house within a few years. Even if you were to buy a house and continue to sell and trade up, you'd at least maintain the home for 3 years to do renovations to increase property value, or something.

reply

theres a scene somewhere in the middle of the film that shows Neil walking through a house that is in the process of being built. so he might be building a house and in the meantime renting a few different ones. but it might also just be malick not bothering too much with continuity. if you look closely in the tree of life that family lives in 3 different houses, theres one real blatantly main one and then another two used for interiors, you would only notice that though after a few viewings.

reply

...Or is this Malick playing loose with continuity?
Hmmm. I didn't see a conventional "narrative" at all; in what I saw the whole concept of "continuity" is irrelevant.

The images I saw followed the "many worlds" hypothesis, where the story keeps branching and branching ...and we see _both_ branches. Whenever a film does this, we're used to one branch being portrayed as "a dream" and the other as "reality", and being able to tell which one is which (if we just watch carefully enough:-). But even that's not what I saw in this film. Here it becomes impossible to tell what's imagined by the characters and what's imagined by the filmmaker and what actually happened.

A few examples: we see both a divorce and a new house. We see both the two of them raising the child together and Marina as a single parent. We see Marina end up both in Paris and in Oklahoma.

Talking about "continuity" problems is like putting just one toe in the water when there's a whole ocean in view. This film doesn't even try to respect conventional continuity - after all, it doesn't narrate a single coherent sequence of events - its point and structure is something else entirely.

reply