MovieChat Forums > Disappeared (2009) Discussion > Jessica Heeringa - I live near where she...

Jessica Heeringa - I live near where she went missing (Long)


So tonight's episode is about Jessica and I am looking forward to it, I live like 20 minutes from where she went missing.

Heeringa is believed to have been abducted from the Exxon Mobil gas station in Norton Shores where she worked on the night of April 26, 2013. She was 25 at the time and the mother of a young son.

I have heard many theories on what happened to her but really am not totally sure. I know her fiance (Dakotah) sold drugs and got arrested for it and there were rumors that she was selling or doing drugs but again these are just rumors. I really doubt this has anything to do with her disappearance but there was a lot of news about it after he was arrested.

Dakotah claims that Jessica's family falsely accused him of abuse and neglect of their son and they tried to take custody away from him after she disappeared but they lost. The father agreed to allowed Jessica's sister to have the boy every other weekend to compromise.

Her fiance claims they were going to marry but her family claims she was going to leave him.

Apparently she was having a relationship with another man who was considered a very big person of interest, he even got a place so that she could come live with him. He has a silver mini van just like the one seen driving away from the gas station she disappeared from and saw her that night. Big twist is he woman who provided police with their biggest clue in the Jessica Heeringa disappearance — the description that led to the sketch of a possible suspect — has a close relationship with a person later identified as a person of interest in the case.

They are brother and sister. I am pretty sure his family is his alibi.

This is what we know about that night:

-7:30 – 8:15 p.m.: A man who told police he was Heeringa's boyfriend at the time (*Not to be confused with her fiance, Dakotah Quail-Dyer) arrived at the Exxon station in a work vehicle, a silver full-size van. The two reportedly had a discussion regarding their alleged relationship.

-A customer advised that Heeringa appeared to be upset after the conversation with the male subject.

-7:40 – 8:50 p.m.: A female friend entered the store through the front door to visit Heeringa. Nothing suspicious was noticed at that time.

-Both the female friend and a male customer observed a bluish silver van pull up to Heeringa while she was changing the receipt paper in one of the pumps. It appeared that the male driver and Heeringa were having a friendly conversation.

-10:55 p.m.: A female customer entered the store and purchased a lighter. She advised that Heeringa was alone in the store and did not appear to be nervous or distressed. The customer did not see anyone in the store or in the parking lot.

-11 p.m.: An Exxon manager and her husband were riding their motorcycles eastbound on Sternberg Road.

-She saw a silver minivan slowly enter the north drive of the Exxon station from the service drive of the Pointes Mall.

-The van drove behind the Exxon station, did a u-turn and extinguished its headlights as it pulled behind the store facing west.

-The manager suspected Heeringa may be in the process of stealing from Exxon, so she turned around on Harvey Street to return to the store.

-The manager and her husband drove to the Pointes Mall, west of the Exxon station, and parked in the lot with a view of the north and west sides of the Exxon station. The minivan was parked on the north side of the Exxon station.

-There were no other vehicles in the lot except for Heeringa's.

-The manager saw a figure standing at the rear of the van and noticed the van’s rear hatch was open. The figure shut the rear hatch and quickly opened it again. It appeared as though the figure was adjusting something in the rear of the van, and then closed the hatch again. She noted that the person's head was just above the roof of the van.

-The person then walked to the driver’s door, got into the van and began driving westbound on the service drive.

-The manager said the store’s rear security light was not on and the store’s rear door did not open at any time. She never saw a struggle or heard anyone yell for help. She did not see Heeringa outside of the store.

-As the van drove closer to their location in the parking lot, the manager and her husband started their motorcycles and pulled up to the service drive. As the van passed, she looked at the driver, a male subject wearing a red or orange sweatshirt. Her husband stated that he did not see the subject well, but did see that he had “crazy” or wavy hair. Neither of them saw Heeringa or anyone else in the van.

-The manager and her husband pulled onto the service drive and followed the van until it stopped at Grand Haven Road. The manager’s husband stated that he was positive the van was a Chrysler Town and Country van, silver in color, as it was the same type a relative owned (Note: This vehicle was located and was in Traverse City at the time of the abduction). He clearly remembered the Town and Country logo on the rear hatch door. Neither obtained the license plate number, as they had no reason to believe a crime had occurred.

-The van turned northbound on Grand Haven Road, while the manager and her husband turned southbound on Grand Haven Road and went home.

-11:02 p.m: Surveillance video from inside of a closed store in the Pointes Mall captured a silver minivan turning northbound onto Grand Haven Road.

-11:03 p.m: Surveillance video from the Homestead Tavern captured a silver minivan driving northbound on Grand Haven Road.

-11:05 p.m: Surveillance video from the Coin Zone captured a silver minivan driving northbound on Grand Haven Road.

-11:10 p.m: A male customer arrived at the gas station, pulled up to the pump and attempted to purchase gasoline. He was unable to do so as the pump would not activate. When the pump did not activate, he entered the store believing that the clerk may have been in the back room and not aware of his presence at the pump. He was unable to locate Heeringa. Upon exiting the store, he spoke with a female customer and called 911.

-11:15 p.m.: Patrol units are dispatched to Exxon, 1196 E Sternberg Road, Norton Shores, regarding a suspicious situation.

-11:25 p.m.: The first officer arrives and begins investigation. Officers searched the store but did not locate Heeringa. Officers located Heeringa's purse and jacket in the back room. The purse contained $420 in cash. Officers noted that nothing inside the store indicated a struggle. There was nothing that appeared to be disturbed. Officers exited the rear door and noted that the door did not have a handle on the outside.

-Officers located items of possible evidence outside the rear door, including what appeared to be a 2-inch by 3-inch blood stain on the concrete, later determined to be Heeringa's. Officers photographed the interior and exterior of the store and evidence items prior to collection. Officers collected a sample of the possible blood stain and packaged the other evidence items.

-11.38 p.m.: Exxon owner was contacted regarding the open store. He in turn contacted the day-shift manager to respond as she lives closer to the store.

-11:50 p.m.: The day-shift manager arrives at the Exxon station and provides officers with her observations of the silver minivan and its driver.

-The manager advised that the cash drawer was “counted down” for the next shift, indicating Heeringa was preparing to close the store. While talking to officers, the manager observed the man claiming to be Heeringa's boyfriend drive past the store in a work vehicle. He was contacted to come to the Exxon station and was questioned by officers.

I really don't know who did it, it seems like the boyfriend and fiance are both obvious and likely suspects but still I am unsure.

Any thoughts before the episode tonight?

reply

I don't think they have anything to do with it but it's odd that the day manager and her husband were that diligent about theft of property and yet never checked on the young woman alone at the store! As far as who I think did it, I'm guessing it's neither the boyfriend or the fiancé but instead some man who saw that she worked alone and he took her and most likely killed her soon after. It's just makes it more sad to me that the owner didn't care about his employees enough to put up a camera and that that woman and her husband didn't care enough to check on her. Both things maybe would not have changed anything it just make it even sadder to me.

reply

Well to be fair the husband couldn't check on her unless he got a ride, they had one car and one cell phone. I don't think it is a coincidence that a silver van was owned by one of her boyfriends and there just happens to be video and witnesses of the van leaving around the time she disappeared, it is owned by the same boyfriend that upset her earlier and wanted her to move in with him.

I don't think it was random at all, I think she knew who the person was but that is just my opinion.

As for the owner yes they got bashed very hard when this happened and people were outraged.

reply

I'm sorry I wasn't clear, I meant the husband and wife on their motorcycles. They decided to stop and watch the guy in the silver van and then follow him but never thought to go back or split up and check on the young girl who was working alone?!
If it was the boyfriend don't you think the woman and man who saw the driver of the van would have been able to ID him? Also they stated that is a very common vehicle. I think if it was a domestic issue it would not have left such little evidence and would not have been so quick. And if she had just argued with the boyfriend why is she then seen casually talking to the driver of the silver van while refilling the tape. It seems the attack was quick and not something that escalated from an argument about personal issues. I think the man in the silver Van pulled up and talked to her, she was comfortable but there were people around so he left and waited till she was alone and came back and somehow got her outside and most likely he knocked her out and placed her in the back of the Van.

reply

It is strange that they never went to check on her like they should have. It doesn't really make any sense and makes them seem either selfish or sort of stupid. They just happen to be driving by and think something is happening and yet they do not check on Jessica or write down a license number.

The person who gave the description of the driver in the silver van (http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_jessica_heeringa_mi_130430_wmain.jpg) has a brother who was dating Jessica (the guy who bought her the apartment) and he owns his own silver van, the fact that his sister gave the description is very odd. It is just hard to trust someone whose brother was a main suspect for a long time.

I guess it could be someone random but I really am not sure about that.

As for the manager (Susan Follett) and the owner of the station they have showed no respect for the family at all, they refuse to cooperate now and the owner still has not installed camera's.

There are a lot of suspects and one huge rumor is that she was taken for sex trafficking but this again is just another rumor.

reply

If she was going to cover for her brother though, why say it was a silver van? Why not say it looked blue or why say anything at all? Either way it's a really sad case and I hope the family get some answers soon. Thanks for all of the info, I didn't follow the show that well yesterday and you really filled in some of the blanks.

reply

The van was caught on video so she had no choice but to say it was silver. I am not sure why she said anything at all but everything just seems so coincidental and strange. I do hope the family finds closure.

reply

Could you tell in the video that it was silver? It seems like most cctv tapes are more blurs and shapes and you don't get a lot of specifics. Just curious how large is the town?

reply

The town has less than 24,000 people in it.

Here is the video, the van drives by at about 45 seconds in to it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9wEp2PBkjw

reply

Thanks for the link! I can't imagine how frustrating that is for cops and family, you can't really tell much from that video. Wow, that is a small town!

reply

Thanks for the great summary, XImNotHereX!

After watching the episode, it certainly seems like there are a lot of unanswered questions, but one thing does seem certain, i.e., that she was abducted.

I found it nearly incomprehensible that the store didn't have surveillance cameras. Oh, I know, the owner said robbery wasn't an issue, but in today's world? Come on! Surveillance cameras are very common now, even in private homes, so why not at a place of business, especially when it's the type of business most likely to be robbed?

Anyway, I feel really sorry for Jessica's family. I always think disappearance has to be the WORST thing for a family, because they simply can't get closure. At least with a known murder, they have a body to grieve over and bury. I hope her son is doing okay...as okay as can be expected.


--

My pet peeves:
http://thesearemypetpeeves.blogspot.com

reply

You are welcome! I guess I missed a few things in the news or something because I do remember the sister losing the custody battle a year or so ago but now she has custody, so I guess something changed.

The owners excuse was ridiculous and the owner got bashed really hard when this happened, people were really angry. It makes no sense not to have security cameras and it just comes down to a cheap owner.

I feel bad for her family but think when they were trying to take the son away from his father they came off a little bad. At the time the father had only been arrested for marijuana selling in the past which isn't a great thing but he actually did seem like a loving father and they wanted to take the kid away from the only parent he had left, that looked bad to a lot of people when it was happening.

The only theory that makes sense to me the most would be the boyfriend with the silver van (the one named Jess) that wanted Jessica to move in with him but then she said no and he was upset, he just happened to drive like 40 miles to a lake to be with family and his family is his alibi. Lot of places in 40 miles to hide a body. His sister was the eyewitness that gave the description of the driver so how can we trust that when her brother drives a similar van and was in the area at the time? Seems way to coincidental to me. I guess he went on a fishing trip and his phone records confirm that but I still can't get past how coincidental it is.

I guess it could be someone else but it is hard to say.

It is a really sad story and I do hope her family gets closure soon.

reply