am i the only one..
..who felt completely unmoved by this film?
first of all, let me say that i had extremely high hopes for this film, especially after having seen mr. ralston on tv and being moved to tears by his harrowing struggle for survival..
that said, i felt as though what could've been a staggeringly emotional and inspiring journey became, in the hands of danny boyle, yet another distracting split-screen fiasco which left me completely at a loss and totally devoid of any empathy for mr. ralston's story.. i.e., in my opinion, a completely mismatched directorial effort..
first of all, ralston comes off as a complete thrill-seeking jerk, much like the boneheads who just days ago filmed themselves knocking over a huge murshroom rock at utah's geologically historic goblin valley state park.. it is these kinds of common sense-defying aholes that this movie reminded me off so i was instantly turned off..
i guess not being familiar with mr. ralston's back story, i found the unexpected display of foolhardy stupidy.. er, bravado, totally devoid of anything i could have empathized with or relate to on a human level..
worse yet, after the movie was over, all i kept thinking about is that he deserved it..
in fact, halfway through it, i had completely lost interest and kept openly rooting for him to cut his arm off and put himself and the audience out of our collective misery..
so was it a directorial fail or was i simply mistaken in expecting a tear-jerking, emotional journey type film?
i felt disturbed by the fact that i couldn't muster up one iota of sympathy for the guy.. and even the fact that i love james franco's acting didn't seem to add to the experience in any positive way..
final assessment: i would not watch this again even if someone held a gun to my head..
it wasn't the fall from her 16th-floor penthouse that killed her, it was the landing