am i the only one..


..who felt completely unmoved by this film?

first of all, let me say that i had extremely high hopes for this film, especially after having seen mr. ralston on tv and being moved to tears by his harrowing struggle for survival..

that said, i felt as though what could've been a staggeringly emotional and inspiring journey became, in the hands of danny boyle, yet another distracting split-screen fiasco which left me completely at a loss and totally devoid of any empathy for mr. ralston's story.. i.e., in my opinion, a completely mismatched directorial effort..

first of all, ralston comes off as a complete thrill-seeking jerk, much like the boneheads who just days ago filmed themselves knocking over a huge murshroom rock at utah's geologically historic goblin valley state park.. it is these kinds of common sense-defying aholes that this movie reminded me off so i was instantly turned off..

i guess not being familiar with mr. ralston's back story, i found the unexpected display of foolhardy stupidy.. er, bravado, totally devoid of anything i could have empathized with or relate to on a human level..

worse yet, after the movie was over, all i kept thinking about is that he deserved it..

in fact, halfway through it, i had completely lost interest and kept openly rooting for him to cut his arm off and put himself and the audience out of our collective misery..

so was it a directorial fail or was i simply mistaken in expecting a tear-jerking, emotional journey type film?

i felt disturbed by the fact that i couldn't muster up one iota of sympathy for the guy.. and even the fact that i love james franco's acting didn't seem to add to the experience in any positive way..

final assessment: i would not watch this again even if someone held a gun to my head..



it wasn't the fall from her 16th-floor penthouse that killed her, it was the landing

reply

If you felt nothing during this film, you have no heart, no matter how reckless he was.



Enter my contest! I need help for a new signature! Maybe I'll choose yours and you'll win a cash prize!

reply

The ending was very moving to me.

reply

why should we feel something for an actor.
I felt nothing. I guess in order to find this good you have to really put yourself in this position. I don't see movies like that.
therefore this movie was too long and plain boring I watched in several tries. until I completed it. I thought at some point it would get better.
I need more diversity in a movie and they need to make it more entertaining to watch.
4 out of 10.

reply

You were bored and need more diversity? That says A LOT about your personality.

reply

so because I found it boring, I am suddenly a disturbed person??
they could have made it more interesting to Watch.

buried a live was happening in a box the Whole movie and was interesting
phoneboth was interesting.
127 may be name cause it feels like you Watch it in 127 hours.

point is you don't need a 2 hours movie to get the point that it sucks to be trapped under a stone.

reply

Old post but...

Interesting that you mention Buried Alive as I had been contrasting it in my own mind. I found Buried Alive to be... mostly pointless. A guy gets buried and dies. Not too much was really explored.

In contrast I quite enjoyed 127. Though it certainly had its flaws, it did put me there with the guy and I shared his frustrations, reflections and his failures and eventual sacrifice and triumph.

I'm not against movies with downer endings but I didn't like Open Water much either FWIW. On the other hand, La Cabina is one of my favorite movies.

And yes, he was a bit of a jerk and somewhat deserved it but who hasn't made mistakes? The movie also showed that he'd tested the rock to see it was sturdy, he just hadn't checked well enough.

reply

I agree that the main character was an arrogant, dimwit jerk. It was hard to have sympathy for him.

reply