The biggest problem with this movie
No rewatchablilty value.
shareSpeak for yourself π I can't wait to pick up the bluray!
share
MovieChat Forums > Oppenheimer (2023) Discussion > The biggest problem with this movie
I agree. It was a good movie, but I have no interest in watching it again or even buying it. And I don't need an explosion every 2-5 minutes. Plus there is a ton of 3-hour movies or movies very close to being 3 hours that I like. I'd say it's also my least favorite Christopher Nolan movie. I think Inception, The Prestige, and the three Batman movies he made have way more re-watch factor to them. And when I say I don't need an explosion every 2-5 minutes, The Batman was my favorite movie of 2022. That movie barely has any action in it. But I also like the Lord Of The Rings movies (both theatrical and extended), Extended Cut of The Patriot with Mel Gibson, 3-hour cut of Avatar, Avatar 2, and the 3-hour cut of Watchmen. I also don't mind Titanic. I can watch/re-watch that. Plus I saw it twice in a movie theater as a kid. I think I was in 3rd grade when it released in theaters. Well, the first time I was interested in it because I just liked whatever my sisters liked and stuff and they wanted to see it. The second time I was dragged to the movie theater because my mom wanted to see it again and if a movie was PG-13 or under, the whole family HAD to go. No if's, and's, or but's. And I wasn't old enough to stay home while everyone else went. So I saw Titanic twice in a movie theater. It flew by both times too. I also liked the 4-hour cut of Justice League. So there are 3-hour movies I like or movies over 3 hours that I like. Plus I don't need constant action/explosions. But for Oppenheimer, I don't see any real re-watch factor in it. It's a good movie, but it's not something I'm going to automatically grab and watch. All the other long movies I mentioned I'd rather watch instead. And I put entertainment first too. All the other movies I mentioned entertained me. Oppenheimer was good, but it didn't exactly entertain. I wasn't really having fun watching it. So yeah. I can agree that the movie has no re-watch factor. It's good, but no re-watch factor.
sharePudgy Pugh naked?
shareYou can just find that on Google Images or some celeb nudity site. Plus if you really want nudity or even sex, there is a whole section of the internet to turn to. She's also been nude in other movies before Oppenheimer. Also, I don't really care for that actress, so seeing her nude in the movie did nothing for me. Heck, I've heard she's done nudity in other movies, but I didn't rush to go look it up. The first time I saw her nude was in Oppenheimer. Plus her nude scenes in the movie makes up like a minute or two, which is why I say just go look up screenshots or clips of her nude scenes from the movie on Google Images or a celeb nudity site. Why sit through 3 hours for a minute or two of nudity? Just go look it up. I also want to say all her nude scenes happen in the first half of the movie. So anyone re-watching the movie for that will be bored for the whole second half of the movie. Definitely the last hour. But yeah. Seeing her nude doesn't boost the re-watch factor at all, especially when you can just look up stuff on the internet. You could probably find a compilation video of her nude scenes in the movie.
shareYou're joking, right? Please say you're joking!
shareThe biggest problem was how boring it is. I don't watch movies for realism, I watch them to escape reality and be entertained.
Unfortunately, most academy award winners tend to be boring af, with a few exceptions such as Silence of the Lambs. I'm sure this movie will win the Oscars, but I won't ever watch it again in my life.
I think I'd re watch it, but only after reading up on some of the history
shareAgreed. Especially the second half, wow....
shareMe and a bunch of others who saw it more than once in theaters: π
Oh well