MovieChat Forums > The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) Discussion > Poor film but BRILLIANT lead

Poor film but BRILLIANT lead

posted 13 years ago by oliverfennell
6 replies | jump to latest

I can't really say the film overall was much good. Too many plot holes and question marks. But WOW, "Martin" was fantastic.

[–] balducci2 13 years ago

Yeah, I would agree. He did a good job. Especially as this appears (from IMDB) to be the only movie he has worked on. I wonder whether he had prior stage / theater experience.

[–] balducci2 13 years ago

A couple of interviews with him:

http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2011/10/interview-the-human-centipede-2-laurence-r-harvey

http://www.movieline.com/2011/10/05/meet-laurence-r-harvey-the-face-of-the-human-centipede-ii/

[–] CasseroleWorshipper 13 years ago

Dr. Heiter was more compelling.
I don't mean to impose, but I am the Ocean.

[–] Naturezrevenge 12 years ago

I think both the films were lousy, gimmicky and weak in general, but Dieter Laser was obviously born to play a mad scientist and "Martin" was pretty damn good too.

[–] GuyOnTheLeft 10 years ago

Agree completely.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]