NETFLIX has the unrated version...
It has the barb-wire rape scene and everything
shareWhat is the barb wire rape scene? I am watching it on stream right now and it has about 10 minutes left and I sure as hell did not see that. I saw the sandpaper masturbation and the teeth being knocked out which was supposedly cut. What point does it happen in the movie?
share[deleted]
i don't care about anything but the baby scene. Is that scene in the instant version? I don't want to see that scene.
shareit is.
shareoh well.
shareYes the streaming version has everything in it, Gee I can't understand why people are so put off by the baby crushing scene. Why look at a movie about a man attaching 12 bodies together mouth to anus and doing various terrible things to these folks and worry about a scene with a baby. And I think it was the placenta not the baby.
shareIt's a parent thing really. For me at least. I don't want that image in my head right now because I have two babies. Placenta wouldn't bother me, but everyone has said it's the baby's head.
shareIf you can't take that scene then don't watch the movie. Period. That's one of the best scenes in the flick. Go watch Disney channel with your kids
shareoh great here we go again.
shareoh btw *beep* you, you ass munching cock knocker
http://www.facebook.com/CaligariFilms
[deleted]
Happy to amuse you.
http://www.facebook.com/CaligariFilms
I'm pretty certain it's a baby's head. I can't say for certain; I flinched and looked away. I completely agree about the parent thing, though: with a four-year-old and one on the way, scenes like that have a profound effect on my otherwise high tolerance for abjection.
*****
When I am king you will be first against the wall.
Thank you.
sharei didnt notice a rape scene, but i did the hammer scene and the sandpaper scene was there, sandpaper wasnt graphic though
shareJust watched it. Even without the baby scene, the movie overall is awful. Not because it is graphic etc. It is just pointless. The first one was too, but it at least had conflict. What the hell is the point here? I liked the idea behind it, but it was executed poorly.
http://www.facebook.com/CaligariFilms
Oh look, the wimpy father's got insults.
BUGS
Wow that's from like a year ago. Where the *beep* have you been? Did you just now see the movie and you're looking on imdb to feel cool? I had already forgot about this stupid movie, thanks for reminding me about it. It reminds me to never buy it. This is one of those sequels that I pretend didn't happen because they suck really bad.
And by the way, i'm not a wimp. I just don't like movies that try too hard to be shocking. And usually they use babies being slaughtered to shock people and it is really pointless. Case in point, this. Was there any point to having a pregnant woman who gives birth only to crush its head? And even worse, Feast 2. What is the point of finding a baby and throwing it to the creature like that? The baby was at most twenty lbs. he wasn't weighing that douche bag down. Plus it is just so random. I hate *beep* like that. It isn't so much the killing of babies, just the random *beep* wannabe shock value. It's up there with jump scares.
http://youtu.be/iBWNypGb6UA
Lol, feel cool? Every time I see a movie I browse through the first 10 pages of its message board. Not everyone sees movies as soon as they are released. I haven't heard of 'Feast 2'.
BUGS
anyway. its cool. But i'd recommend Feast, the two sequels not so much. And even though it sounds ridiculous, I plan seeing THC3
http://youtu.be/iBWNypGb6UA
Well gee, even I don't really see what else there is to add to this 'series'. They would have to play it for laughs.
BUGS
there's a five hundred person centipede and a few other crazy things. like i said it's ridiculous.
http://youtu.be/iBWNypGb6UA
I didn't find the scene here that upsetting, but the one that really got me was in Under the Skin when the baby is left abandoned, probably to die, on the beach with both parents having just drowned and the Scarlett Johanssen character uninterested in the baby's fate.
--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250
Well yeah, it is to add to the totally outlandish things all ready seen in the movie. It is almost as messed up as seeing someone beheaded. It is not suppose to be a politically correct movie.
Additionally, it is not like this is not done in real life. Abortions are done pretty much the same way. Only thing is, you never get to see them done.
Reminder: The O.C. resets to its first episode on POP network April 1 @ 2 p.m. EST
I like a lot of messed up movies, but this pile of crap takes the cake and makes you re eat it out of someone else's ass. I like the first HC but this, I am in utter shock. I have nothing good to say about this movie, nothing. There was no reason for this to be made except for shock value and to see how far a filmmaker can push the envelop and still get a movie made. The only good thing I can say is that the movie is now over and I can try and clear my head of the BS. I know there will be people who like, even love this movie and thats fine, I have no issue with that at all. It really has nothing to do with the first HC except in concept, kinda. Just a sick individual imitating art thinking movies are real.
That being said I look forward to the harsh comebacks coming my way.
It's not sick, it's *TRYING* to be sick. Tom Six has always been a hack and when you just toss whatever retarded, outlandish ideas you have in your head onto a piece of paper and try to pass it as "shocking," it shows your desperation and also your lack of a handle on story and narrative.
When I saw the baby scene I rolled my eyes. Not because I'm "too cool to be shocked," but because it was stupid. It's like a 13 year old boy trying to come up with "shocking" ideas. Those of us with a brain and love for cinema are more offended at the lack of imagination and technique in the story.