Personally, I think having Duke kill and then the sisters bring people back would do more harm than good, as the Crocker's curse has HUGE negative side effects. One, they get addicted and two, they get super strength. That would almost insure that someone would have to end him once they fixed everyone else. He'd be so far gone and he'd have no one left to feed off of. Also, the sisters have to absorb all the injuries and pain of the others they bring back to life! Another one that would drive them to madness.
I do believe there are other ways to keep troubles at bay without harm though. Ginger, in fact, would be a better trouble whisperer than Audrey herself! She'd tell them to calm down and stop fast. How about the two troubled people whose dreams effected reality, Carrie Benson and the adopted Driscoll boy? If they could make negative things happen, they could surely make positive things happen as well. Come to think of it, their two troubles were almost too similar.
Anyhow, the writers had to come up with a good reason as to why, in 500 + years, no one was smart enough to think of this very solution. All the people with the most beneficial troubles are either killed or sent away, very conveniently.
By the way, I still predict that Duke will become an addicted curse killing machine in 5b and have to be saved from himself and the town from him. All the troubles his family felt the need to kill off for centuries are now back at once. Audrey needed Duke to kill the organ stealing man...well, he's baaaack! How about the plague of 1901? Oh yeah, Duke's about to become the monster he's tried to avoid for 3-4 seasons. Also, I predict Nathan and Audrey will be the ones trying to keep the guard from ending Duke, while they try to "fix" him.
reply
share