Who, besides a complete sadist, could possibly enjoy this?
I ask you.
What diversity used to mean: Diversity
What diversity now means: Fewer white people
I ask you.
What diversity used to mean: Diversity
What diversity now means: Fewer white people
A masichist could enjoy it just the same.
shareI wouldn't say I enjoyed it. I thought it was a decent horror film though. Same with the first sequel. I will probably never watch either again.
shareI found the idea quite interesting actually.
I was led to this movie by a Tennessee teacher apparently showing the sequel, of this movie, to children in his class. It was trending on facebook yesterday. Then I saw someone's comment on the posts for the trending say what it was about. Then I checked out wikipedia and found out. Immediately, I looked for bootleg sites that would show it and found one. Apparently, I was interested.
Additionally, I found it kind of a turn on that a gal, as attractive (I thought) as the midsection gal was), would appear to be eating fecal matter. Mind you, I was absolutely repulsed by TWO GIRLS ONE CUP. I did feel sorry for them, throughout the whole movie; however, it was so strange, it was worth looking into. So bizarre.
Reminder: The O.C. resets to its first episode on POP network April 1 @ 2 p.m. EST
Are you serious? Was a Tennessee teacher really showing the sequel to this -- to CHILDREN?
sharehttp://www.ew.com/article/2016/04/29/human-centipede-2-high-school
It was trending on facebook and it was the only way I would have known about this.
THERE IS NOTHING TO FEAR. COLLEGE FOOTBALL IS HERE!!!
All right, so the teacher was disciplined but what would make any teacher think this film is appropriate for children? It truly does boggle the mind.
Am I the only one who noticed that his happened in a southern school? What gives here?
Not sure. However, it would fit in an anatomy class or a class on the digestive system of humans.
THERE IS NOTHING TO FEAR. COLLEGE FOOTBALL IS HERE!!!
I know history teachers who show Schindler's List and that's a hard R movie as well????
"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine
Come on, that is totally different. Schindler's List is a film based on fact, an important piece of history.
I get that but if we are going by graphic content that is inappropriate to be shown in school Schindler's List is definitely worse. Now of course I would agree that Schindler's List has more educational value to it but that's not the issue we are discussing.
"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine
Are you fucking serious?????
shareYes Schindlers list is a harder R than human centipede
shareWell you my friend... Are fucked up.
Schindler's List a touching and inspiring movie that deserves to be seen my any kinds of audiance. Honestly, I don't remember any unnecessary violence in the movie, and it has a deep message.
Human Centiped on another hand is a torture porn which has only one purpose: disgust the viewers. I RARELY turn off a movie before its ending and I can handle gore and extreme violence (I must admit that I love Cannibal Holocaust, Hostel 1 and 2 and Martyrs... And they are extreme movies). But in the case of Human Centiped, I had to give up watching after I've seen many people making a chain on their knees with their mouths glued to the anus of the person in front of them. It is not that much that it disgusted me or shocked me (of course I didn't enjoy it but as a matter of fact I've seen worse); it was more about the fact that this is totally deviant and I don't see how anyone could actually enjoy looking at this.
Saying that Shindler's List is "harder" sounds SO aberrant. Maybe just MAYBE I missed something... It sounds to me like if I would be saying that The Departed is an harder R than Guinea Pig.
I’ll repeat what someone else said in this thread: Some movies aren’t meant to be enjoyed.
shareThis might be an ignorant question but... What's the point of making them in this case?
Of course it would always reach a specific audience and will most likely be viewed by many curious people... But...
Well I say this but in a way I am aware that there is every kinds of different movies and they are all made to please some people. I can't say that they shouldn't be made.
This been said, I just don't understand how someone could actually come up with such a fucked up idea and have the guts to make into a film. I must admit that sometimes it works for, sometimes it doesn't.
Again we aren't talking about how good the film is. Of course Schindler's List is a much better film than Human Centipede, it means more, it is more emotional and it is very historically accurate. However that isn't what we are talking about, we are talking about how appropriate it is for teenage viewers and Schindler's List has numerous sex scenes, full frontal male and female nudity, more F-bombs than Human Centipede (at least I think) and more graphic violence. Keep in mind I am comparing it to Human Centipede First Sequence, of course Full and Final sequence are more graphic.
shareMartyrs is way worse than this.
shareI saw it once, and the thought of watching it a second time makes me queezy...
shareWell, it depends on the way you look at it. I would agree that Martyrs had a bigger shock value, but at least it had a purpose and a message. Here... It was all about disgust the viewers without any purpose.
In a way I find a movie like Martyrs which used the gore and violence to say something more enjoyable and less disturbing than a movie where the violence is anything but justified.
I didn't exactly "enjoy" the film but it wasn't a bad horror film lol.
If a horror is effective, I'd consider it a good film.
A Serbian Film was better though.
This movie only offends people that haven't seen it.
The only offensive things about this movie is how tedious it is. Anybody who talks about the shock value clearly hasn't watched it, and is just believing the hype.