Meredith Vickers
Anyone think she needed a scourging?
share[deleted]
A scourging is always better.
shareI think she was fully scourged by that ship.
shareNo, I mean with a whip.
shareThat's only soft scourging. To fully dominate you need to have a ship roll on top of her, that's the way you do it!
shareThat will kill her. She won't even have time to process that she's been dominated.
No, you gotta beat her with a whip tipped with pieces of metal, bone or other sharp objects and beat her until she permanent physical and emotional scars.
She was running away from the ship and she even changed direction of couple of times. The engineer was tormenting her by driving the ship towards her anyway. She knew she was being dominated and she hated/loved it.
shareNot the same thing. It was mere moments. True breaking takes much longer.
shareAre you breaking them for their own good or for your own pleasure?
shareFor the good of all mankind.
shareThen surely, for efficiency's sake, doing it quicker is better since there are lots of people out there and only one of you.
shareNo, its isn't. Breaking people down takes time. You can't rush it.
shareAn expert can do it in one sentence if they have to.
These taspar eggs are excellent by the way.
No, they can't. You gotta completely wipe any defiance from them.
shareDefiance, to me at least, seems like an expectation - or presumption - of lack of control on behalf of those doing the scourging.
Being aware that they themselves are not worthy of the task at hand.
When someone truly knows what they are doing it is child's play to them. Not worth considering any retaliation or elements which will prevent them from achieving what they set out to do.
Perhaps though, perhaps, you don't fully understand what it takes to hold someone to task.
It takes scourging them so they become too afraid to fail you.
shareFear is a useless motivator for reliant output from people.
Set the example and be integral with your approach; trust, respect and eventually emulation should be the markers they hope to achieve from you. Fully owning your universe sets others free to see you as a leader and mentor.
Anything less than that falls squarely on your own lap.
Fear is the only motivator.
Its the only way brats learn anything is if you whip them until they have permanent physical and emotional scars.
It would seem you want to get over your own demons prior to instilling them in others.
You maybe were not spared the rod, but a child can be spoiled in a variety of ways.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone and all of that.
I have no demons.
Brats need to be whipped brutally or they will turn evil.
And BTW, I am without sin so under your logic, I get to cast the first stone.
I said let "He" who is without sin.
Unless you're going to go for an operation I don't think I was referring to you.
I am without sin. I have zero sins.
Who else could you be referring to?
Everybody lies.
That is a sin.
Not when you're entirely justified.
shareJustification is like a box that gets smaller and smaller the more you try and prove something you know to be wrong.
share[That's what you said though.]
No, it isn't. I'm just whipping oppressors.
You said people should whip people with a different colour of skin.
shareYeah, when the oppressed whip their oppressors its okay. But the other way round is racist.
shareAre you suggesting that Winnie Mandela should be whipped by the young men she had killed after they were whipped?
shareThat depends on her race and the race of those she had killed.
shareShe was from South Africa and those she had killed were also from South Africa.
shareNeither of them should be whipped because they're black and that would be racist.
shareWell she whipped young men and then had them set on fire. Are you saying that her being black means she gets to do that to young black men without punishment?
shareThis has all been made up by a white supremacist conspiracy of some kind.
shareCan you prove that?
shareI feel its a white supremacist conspiracy.
shareCan you prove your feelings?
shareYou're asking me for proof. That's racist.
shareYou don't know my skin colour, how can you know I'm racist?
shareI'm assuming your white which makes you an oppressor.
shareYou are just making an ass out of yourself by assuming.
shareWell, I'm ruling out black unless you have internalized racism.
shareYou do what you want. Winnie Mandela killed young black men after sexually harassing them for decades and so falls into your reasoning for internalizing racism too.
share[As are you.]
Black people can't be racist. Its racist for you to suggest otherwise.
She's being a brat so she needs a scourging.
shareThis conversation will just go the same as the last one did and you'll find yourself painted into another corner.
shareI wasn't painted into a corner. And this is still the same conversation. The brat needs to be flogged until she is broken.
shareWhat about male brats?
shareScourge him too.
shareWhich man would you like to scourge?
shareI don't know. One who needs to be scourged.
shareYou have provided many women who you think should be scourged - for the sake of equality could you provide some men you'd like to scourge please?
shareI have a separate department for that. You'll have to ask her.
shareSurely then she'd need to be scourged for having an opinion which isn't the same as your own.
shareNo, we both agree that I'll deal with the women that need scourging while she deals with the men that need it.
shareYou think you agree.
I say she is secretly lusting after those she chooses to be scourged and does not have your best intentions in mind whilst she is fantasising about it.
We're professionals.
shareUnless she is better at this than you and you are being played by her.
shareHow could she possibly be playing me?
We both want the same thing. It would be pointless to double-cross me. Plus, she'd get a scourging.
Maybe you're not as good at it as you think you are?
shareIf that was true, I would have been fired or demoted or something.
I certainly wouldn't have gotten Scourger of the Month.
When you understand how the carrot and stick work you'll see there's more than one way to scourge someone and it seems like you've been royally scourged.
share[Justification is like a box that gets smaller and smaller the more you try and prove something you know to be wrong.]
You already said that.
The second time was to illustrate the first but with more proof of why it is the case.
shareWell, you've not actually proved anything.
The brat needs a severe scourging.
I've proven that you don't have an argument outside of your own head.
shareNo, you haven't. The brat needs to be scourged until she passes out. Make everyone watch.
shareNow you want to be watched whilst you do this?
shareNo, I want other brats to watch what happens when they step out of line.
shareBut you've already stated that the only way to teach them is to scourge them.
Having voyeurs watch you inflict punishment upon one brat, by your own logic, wouldn't help those watching until it was also done to them.
Its a warning. You watch your mum or sister get scourged until she can no longer stand, it sends a message for you to stay in line or you end up like that.
shareI still think it shows a weakness of character to scourge rather than educate.
shareThis is education.
shareI don't think it is.
shareWhy not?
shareYou haven't extrapolated anything beyond titillation at your end for a, so far unstated, prompt which puts someone into the category of brat and why your techniques would be useful or effective.
shareLook, I have studied bratology for six god damn years here.
Some people are just brats and they need to be flogged until they are completely broken, physically, mentally, emotional, spiritually, so they become too afraid to be bratty.
I'm sure you have.
Until you can share your observations with others though you could simply be extolling your own virtues upon others without seeing that you are unfit to do so.
I just need a little clarification here upon the brushstrokes.
I gave you clarification. She's a brat and she needs to be whipped until she learns not to be a brat. Why is this so complicated for you?
shareIt's not complicated, it just seems infantile is all.
There doesn't seem to be any weight to your claims of when someone is a brat or not. It seems to be solely at your discretion - and that seems quite bratish to me.
Hermione's a brat. She needs scourging.
Dumbledore should have had her flogged in front of the whole school.
Dawn is like 16 years old. Besides, 12 year olds are not meant to be bratty at all.
shareStill, a 16 year old being scourged?
Questionable at best.
What's your idea? Lock her in a cell and starve her for a few weeks?
shareGive her to Spike.
shareSo he can scourge her?
I think the school should have made Buffy flog Dawn bloody in front of the whole class. It would have sent a clear message to everyone.
I'm not up to date with all my Buffy stories but wasn't Quark from Deep Space 9 the headmaster at Buffy's school?
He'd probably approve of your idea.
Snyder was too soft on them. He should have scourged Buffy, Willow, Cordelia and especially Dawn.
Buffy should also have told Dawn that she was not real, not her sister, just a little energy ball thing, that she killed her mum, and she is a monster/freak that deserves nothing but pain.
She should have locked Dawn in the basement and made her whip herself.
Is that the same Snyder that wrote Alien:Resurrection?
shareI thought that was Joss Whedon.
shareNot the Batman versus Superman director then?
shareNo, it was Principal R. Snyder. Nobody knows what the R stands for.
shareRob?
shareNo idea, but he should have scourged Buffy, Willow, Cordelia and Dawn (a pity he didn't live long enough to in Dawn's case).
Dawn must feel the whip or the belt. It must not stop regardless of how much she is crying.
He was a racist.
shareHow's it questionable?
shareThey are still a child. You cannot charge and punish a child with adult-orientated means.
shareWho oppresses me. She should be whipped every day for that.
shareA pair of socks is more useful than just the one. Well done to you!
shareWhat are you talking about?
shareI'm sure you can work it out.
shareAre you making some stereotype about black people and socks?
shareAre you?
shareHell, no. I'm starting to think you're a racist.
shareDo you want me to feel offended or something by your thoughts?
shareYou offended? I'm the one who should be offended.
sharePlease, be offended by me. It makes for a more interesting distraction.
shareI should whip you.
Unless you're black, cuz that would be racist.
A one trick pony only knows one trick, and it is the one who gets whopped.
shareYou comparing me to a horse? That's racist.
shareYou are right. Donkey would be more appropriate.
share[deleted]
I've seen people in the past who I thought might be the same person but this one takes the biscuit. It would be good if it was funny but it's really boring and dull. They should "Try harder".
share[deleted]
He_cant was one of my favourites. He just wanted to cause problems but didn't ever do anything which was untoward to anyone. I don't know the full story but it seemed like he had a good memory from what he would say.
share[deleted]
I hope he and his friends find their way here. I don't think they broke any terms of service rules but I do think they knew, or at least he knew, how to troll properly. I had many a smile in the wee hours reading his stuff.
Dude.
[deleted]
I saw a couple of his videos near the end. He seemed like a nice bloke with his head and heart in the right place. An awesome troll but not one with an agenda beyond showing up those who thought they knew better.
I think he will be back at some point.
Who the fuck is Angry Batman? Is he trying to steal my style?
share