MovieChat Forums > Under the Skin (2014) Discussion > One of the best movies I've seen in year...

One of the best movies I've seen in years.


Let my preface this by saying that I tend to hate "artsy" films, and I get very annoyed by people overanalzing the *beep* out of movies, finding hidden "themes", symbolism, metaphors...all the power to you, but I think it's mostly irritating.

But I have also grown sick to death of movies lately. They seem to follow the same formulas, and I find myself completely uninterested in the characters, plots, or any of the events that transpire. I can't suspend my disbelief and I stop caring about any of it.

---

Under the Skin was different. From the moment the film started, I was completely captivated. The beginning of movie, with it's obvious Kubrick-inspired style, was effective - easily one of the most enthralling and unsettling openings I've ever seen. From that moment on, I was hooked.

What captured my attention throughout the movie was the hauntingly eerie soundtrack, the beautiful cinematography, and this quality of utter realness. Scarlett Johanson was basically undercover, many scenes were shot with hidden cameras, the interactions she had with the many of the people in this movie were real.

The scenes where she led the men into the black void were completely memorizing. Her seductive allure and beauty in the absence of any physical surroundings, the creepy soundtrack, the total lack of explanation about what is going on - these scenes were simultaneously eerie and erotic. The scene where the two men are seen reaching out to each other in the black void was deeply disturbing as well, and it added just added more allure and mystery. These scenes are still lingering in my mind, they're unlike anything else I've ever witnessed in a movie. I didn't think a movie was capable of making me feel so many emotions like that.

Many times throughout this movie, I wondered if I would be foolish enough to fall for her spell like the other men were. Part of me thinks I would. I found her character very enticing. Of course, Scarlett Johansson was drop dead gorgeous as always, but her acting was very convincing - it rarely occurred to me that I was watching an A-list Hollywood celebrity.

I think the story was coherent enough, though many things were unanswered. Admittedly I do wish more of the plot was revealed in some way, mainly what the aliens were hoping to accomplish, and why they were harvesting men. Leaving this up to interpretation seems foolish because there is no ambiguity in the first place...there is not a single part of this movie that indicates what the aliens were trying to do.

But by in large, this movie was incredible and it captured my attention moreso than any other movie I've seen in years. I never once got bored, distracted, or impatient. I was glued to my chair from the beginning until nearly the end of the credits. I experienced more emotions from this movie than I would have ever expected. Horror, bewilderment, awe, compassion, infatuation, sadness, allure, and some I don't even have words for. This is the sort of movie that I expect to stick with me for years.

reply

Sounds like you may want to reconsider your tendency to reflexively hate "artsy" movies. Just like more mainstream choices, some are fantastic, some are painful wastes of celluloid, and most are somewhere between "meh" and "solid". I never understood many people's visceral negative reaction to what they call "artsy" and possibly "fartsy" films.

reply

I don't automatically assume I'm going to hate an art film, in fact I've seen many that I initially expected to be quite good (It Follows, Black Swan, Goodnight Mommy) which I either disliked or flat out hated. Then I've seen some movies that I didn't even realize were arthouse films before watching them, and some of those turned out to be some of my favorite movies of all time (Babadook, Under the Skin, Moon).

The problem I have with arthouse movies isn't the movies themselves but the way people react to them. It seriously annoying me to see people pulling *beep* out of their ass and literally making up interpretations out of "symbolism" and "underlying themes" that don't exist.

reply

Is It Follows an "art film"? It's been on my list of movies that I might want to watch at some point so I'm just curious because the trailer makes it look like a teen horror/thriller.

reply

Watch it, it's great. And if you haven't seen it, watch You're Next. And if you have seen it...watch it again.

reply

If you haven't watched it yet, do it. This is coming from someone who loves the horror genre but hates horror movies. Sounds utterly stupid and paradoxical, I know, but I just can't find good horror movies. I've tried all sorts, but at least It Follows managed to create an eerie feeling. It's not a teen movie by any means. I don't consider it artsy either.

Horror movies are usually either too focused on jump scares (which anyone with an IQ of 70 can muster up), gore (like Hostel and that kind of garbage), straight out annoying (like Spoorloos - seriously, no one would make that choice in the history of mankind), trying to bite more than it can chew (like Martyrs), or they're trying to make ghosts and poltergeists seem scary when in fact they're just utterly pathetic (like Paranormal Activity).

Hell, even Dark Skies managed to create an eerie feeling which made me watch it again, although the ending didn't live up to the first half of the movie. Anyway, just give It Follows a chance. It's not a teen horror movie, it actually has substance and some original thought behind it.

reply

Horror, bewilderment, awe, compassion, infatuation, sadness, allure, and some I don't even have words for. This is the sort of movie that I expect to stick with me for years.

After that ringing endorsement I got to see this movie!

reply

But by in large, this movie was incredible and it captured my attention moreso than any other movie I've seen in years. I never once got bored, distracted, or impatient.


I concur, great overlooked thriller from the eerie opening scene till the offbeat ending.

reply

Best movie of the decade so far. Idk why the IMDB rating is so low

reply

This movie totally bombed when it premiered because people didn't understand it. I think it will be a while before it finds its audience. Remembered, nobody like Citizen Kane when it first came out and now they consider it the greatest movie ever made.

reply

Probably because so many people have seen it. Ordinarily people would have to seek out this kind of film in order to watch it, but because this movie created so much buzz with the reviews and the marketing, it attracted a larger audience than is typical for this kind of movie. And in attracting so many viewers, it naturally attracted the wrong kinds of viewers. The score would be higher if it only had 25,000 ratings.

Honestly most of the classics that only cinephiles watch like the films of Bergman, Godard, and Tarkovsky would probably have lower ratings if more people had seen them. Persona would at best have a 7.0 if it had 100,000 ratings.

-------------
Live Deliciously! http://bit.ly/2gD7xFP

reply

You are absolutely right. This film is experiential.

reply

Watched this film last night. Eerily well made and directed with just one big problem. It is rather vague and if it wasn't for my trolling effort here, I must admit, I did not even get the gist of the story.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for the subtle parts, especially in artsy films, but this film seemed to offer no explanation at all, subtle or otherwise.

Harvesting humans??? Is that what that special effects gimmick was all about??

And how are we supposed to know what the motorbike gang is all about??

reply

Chris Stuckman's analysis video helped me understand it a lot. You can find it pretty easily on YouTube. I think the point of the motor bikes was just for her superiors to track her down quickly but without blowing their cover. If they went looking for her in spaceships the jig would be up pretty quickly.

If I were you I would watch Stuckman's video, then sit on it for a few months then go back again. I noticed more the second time I watched it.

reply

Thanks jesseredwards. I did view Stuckman's explanation video. Yes, it did shed some more light on the film.

Much as I adore off beat independent films, this film was a tad too vague for me. Excessive vagueness piques ones interest to follow closely while watching; however, failure to understand gist of film, leaves one bored by the end of said film.

Or perhaps my capacity to pick up on subtlety has deteriorated in my advanced years. My attention to detail was never too keen to begin with.

reply

I too was quite impressed by this film; it's a very strange and haunting medication on what it means to be human.

I've been chasing grace/ But grace ain't easy to find

reply

She had a lot more baby fat on her during this movie.

reply

Go watch Schindler's list, SNOB

reply

You know Schindler's list is a fabricated story right?

reply