Viewers really. Most shows in or around the sci-fi genre tend to be budget heavy, so need good viewing figures to justify the tv comapnies/studios to continue to support a show.
True.
Gameshows and 'talent' contest shows can usually survive with ratings similar to a sci-fi show simply becasue they're much cheaper to make, and thus can continue to justify their continued existence.
Sadly.
Even shows with a big fanbase to start with aren't safe. Enterprise and Stargate Universe had two franchises behind them full of fans. But too many switched off eventually. Had they not been a Star Trek and Stargate show, they may not have lasted much longer than FlashForward. (or Terra Nova!)
Yup.
Personally I found FlashForward okay. But it had a mid-season break here in the UK, and I bet a lot of hanging on fans switched off then when they realised they didn't really miss the show when it was off air. That happened to me with The Event. Reached mid-season break, didn't miss the show so didn't watch it when it came back.
Mid-season breaks suck ass. They should wait longer before airing the start of shows with so many episodes so they're aren't any breaks.
I liked the premise behind FlashForward and would probably have watched a second season. But not sure where they were going to go with the show if it got 2 or more seasons.
It's always hard to image where a show could go after such debut story lines, but Goyer had plans for about 4 seasons worth I think. It was all to be some rich groups idea of wiping out a percentage of the worlds population to cut numbers so that man-kind could deal with
At least the final episode had a cool 4(?) years jump flash forward (maybe they could KICKSTARTER a movie or mini-series starting in the year the show finished in in the flash forward )
reply
share