MovieChat Forums > Flashforward (2009) Discussion > Why did they cancel it???????

Why did they cancel it???????



I just started watching FlashForward today. It was soooooo good to me that I watched 5 episodes in like, 9 hours or something.

I found the acting not so good. Just very average.

But the script, I think it was good...

And Joseph Fiennes did a quite good job.

The characters were good, but NOT interesting as Prison Break's characters... Those guys were amazing.

But it was good. My brother watched only 1 episode of Pretty Little Liars and he said himself, it was just another crappy show about teenagers struggling with their relationships. Same thing with Gossip Girl.
Okay, after all, all I'm trying to say is that FlashForward was better than some crappy shows about teenagers.
And I'm soooo disappointed it canceled.

Do you guys think it worth to be canceled????????


Are you watching closely?

reply


The show developed the characters over time - and got better with every episode.

The show is ranked in the top 100 of IMDb top 250 much watch and it died after 1 season. What a shame. I really enjoyed this show.

reply

Good shows get cancelled that's the norm now its crap that gets renewed p.l.l is laughable

reply

I totally loved the series and thought it was ALL good, the acting, the story, the production values, everything.

If it were possible to put myself into a TV series and just live in that universe forever, that would be the one I chose.

But I think it was cancelled because viewers had to be thinkers to enjoy it.

The story was intellectually challenging in a very good way, but maybe "Joe 6-Pack" just didn't get the higher level concepts presented.

You know, sometimes when you work all day, it's too difficult to work at your enjoyment? Easier to be spoon-fed everything at the end of a hard day... However some people find mental stimulation refreshing and invigorating, but lose out to those who would rather have their enjoyment handed to them.

It's too bad that everything has to be dumbed down to the lowest common denominator to get a higher level of acceptance.

An example I'm thinking of is "Lost." A lot of people loved "Lost," for example, which was just an extension and re-canning of an old Twilight Zone story about some astronauts whose craft crashed and they didn't know they were dead and kept trying to escape -- with some elements from the British series "The Prisoner" thrown in.

But Flashforward was a new concept and with more potential scientific reality and logic attached to it. It came the closest I've ever seen to doing a story like this without invoking time-travel paradoxes...

Anyway, I as I said I loved it. It was a great series, it was food for the brain and the emotions -- like the reminders every now and then that all we every really have is this moment right now and we should make the most of all those present moments -- wish it have never left let alone leaving all too soon.

reply

Anyway, I as I said I loved it. It was a great series, it was food for the brain and the emotions -- like the reminders every now and then that all we every really have is this moment right now and we should make the most of all those present moments -- wish it have never left let alone leaving all too soon.


To point out to LCutie, you said you loved it, so I guess that does mean you thought it was good. lol

Just wanted to say though that I liked your interpretation of everything, and your concept of how people think and why they relate or not, to the show. I agree. I remember the show Awake, which lasted one very short season last year. It was an excellent show, but you had to think to follow it, and it seems the thinkers lost. Then there was also the show, His Own Worst Enemy (MOWE) with Christian Slater. That too you had to do a lot of thinking. I loved it; it was cancelled after about 6 or so episodes. They recently had Do No Harm which looked similar to MOWE, and they had cancelled it after 2 episodes, but now I'm seeing other eps turning up so I'm not sure if they decided to just burn off the other eps. Some ppl prefer shows where they don't have to figure things out. A sad thing when there are others who are the opposite. We should still get to see the shows we want too as well.


RIP Lee Thompson Young. Too young and gone too soon!

reply

Actually in fringe they had where they sent someone's consciousness from the future to change the past. So the concept is not that new. It is part of the time travel genre and discussed since you can send particles through time and maybe that can include information even if we cant send matter through time. Or more like in time travel cars. I think you might like Fringe.




C

reply

Did you think it was good? Lol

reply


Did you think it was good? Lol



I laughed at your comment, but come on now, she did a good job of talking about the show and a great explanation of why some people possibly may not have liked it. But you did make me laugh. lol


RIP Lee Thompson Young. Too young and gone too soon!

reply

This show was a mini-series, as opposed to a normal series, the difference being a few things: The storyline had a predetermined beginning and end. The whole story was likely written before the show aired. The story was told, and it's over.

But they did manage to leave itself open to a new mini-series (much like the ending of Dexter)

The show wasn't really canceled, it just "ended".

I saw an ad for this show here on IMDb yesterday, and watched all 22 episodes in less than 24 hours. Loved it! I went and grabbed this series based solely on the tagline, and I wasn't disappointed. Everything was perfect, including seeing cameos of my freakin' idol, Seth Macfarlane :)

reply

It was definitely cancelled, which happened after the season 1 finale was shot. The season 1 finale was a cliffhanger of a second flashforward designed to lead into the next season (i.e., nothing like the ending of Dexter).

But typical of modern TV, they'd rather get rid of a show that made you think to follow it, and keep stupid "reality" that insults our intelligence.

reply


Seriously, no

It was literally cancelled for lack of ratings

Really don't know where you got the fact that it just "ended"

The network axed cause it wasn't pulling in enough viewers

Shut down. Pulled the plug. Terminated

Get it?

Follow the latest films around the world!! http://7films.dendelionblu.me

reply

No duh. All shows get cancelled for this reason.

What the OP was wondering is WHY the show got cancelled, specifically why it drew low viewer counts. Since no one in this thread seems to have answered I will.

Flashforward's schedule was obliterated into several parts. They were able to show the first 10 episodes, from September to early December, then it was time for Christmas break, then awards show season, then Olympics. After the Olympics ended several weeks later, there was something else that took up major air space and caused the show to be off air from December 3rd to March 18th. That's awfully close to 5 months. When you try and bring a show back after so long, especially a show with such a deep mystery, you can't have those breaks. People had forgotten what the hell had been going on or what the show was or had moved onto other shows.

The reason the show got cancelled was because of the horrible scheduling job ABC tried to pull on it. I mean they never even gave the show a chance. In the show everyone sees a Flashforward of the day April 29th, and ABC decided "Hey lets have the show's finale aire on April 29th!" well they didn't look up it was Olympics year apparently. The show ended a whole 4-5 weeks late because of it.

So TL;DR - Show got cancelled because ABC can't hire people who schedule their new shows that actually have a brain.

reply

That's an accurate analysis. However a network will give a way higher priority in scheduling to a show that's pulling in bigger numbers

If they were lazy with finding the right spot the show had probably lost many viewers already

Also I watched the pilot and to me it was better say than the pilot for The Event - but not by much

It didn't seem nearly awesome material like Breaking Bad or Dexter, quality wise

reply

In this new age of 50% or more of the people watching a show are doing it on line.
When will suits understand this? Thats why good shows are canceled.

reply


I see your point and I agree

That's why HBO Go, Netflix and Hulu are getting more and more attention

That being said there is a shift going on in that TV ads still pay more than online ads, and then you have subscription models like Netflix that are successful but the financials of which are still much being worked out and tuned every year

TV shows cost and they need to make money

Right now they're making more money on TV ads. When that changes - and it almost certainly will - online views and subscriptions will dictate the programming more

Right now, they don't as much

Also if by online you mean illegal downloading I'm afraid you're getting it for free, but your voice won't be heard or listened to. Ever

Follow the latest films around the world!! http://7films.dendelionblu.me

reply

[deleted]

It really wasn't a mini series--I watched it when it was on in prime time. It was billed as a regular network show and was heavily promoted when it began. There was no mention of a limited run. It seemed to be trying to capitalize on the popularity of Lost--there were several shows involving mysteries that started back then, aimed at intelligent people who can tolerate and even enjoy some ongoing ambiguity and not knowing all the answers. I thought Flashforward was one of better entries in this field and was very disappointed when it was cancelled. I can't believe that Fringe lasted several seasons--I watched the 1st couple of episodes and thought it was interesting and the characters were engaging. Then there was an episode involving a crazy professor who was supposed to be using equipment that affected people's brains--but it grossly violated known neuroscience and looked extremely cheesy (if you know anything about brains). Whoever wrote the show could have gotten a scientific consultant, but instead, they just made up stupid stuff. I couldn't watch it any more after that. This made me appreciate show that manage to present futuristic science in believable ways.

reply

Basically because it was a shambles. By the end of the first series I'd resolved not to watch the second if it ever made it to our screens.
I got the distinct impression that the whole enterprise was an initiative test for the scriptwriters: someone presented them with a notice board of assorted random bits of paper and their job was to weave them all into a coherent plot. Not very successful in my opinion and a waste of some talented actors. It made even less sense than the lizard series (V?) that was playing around the same time, but wasn't as bad as the mega-shambles re-make of The Bionic Woman.

reply

I have not seen this yet but the problems we have these days are due to

1.The internet, people have the freedom to watch what they want when they want. So instead of stations having the true ratings they only get the small amount that are actually watching it on TV or their catch up website (I believe that only 2 days count on catch up towards ratings) at the time it actually matters

2. Is the biggest issue! There are so many TV shows and only so many people ( many don't watch TV at these days due to the propaganda filled in it except the sheeple. Many people are waking up)
So if the show does not get the millions and millions in the first year they axe it instead of realising
That it can sometimes take time for a good thing to be built up, instead they expect instant hits. They need to learn to allow things to grow, too high expectations basically!

I am guilty of No.1, I *beep* hate adverts and 3. Which I will add here, we are as impatient as the TV stations are wanting instant ratings, while we are as impatient as wanting to see the next show so this ties in with No.1, we can watch an entire series on the net again screwing with the ratings.

4.America and the UK should find a way that the ratings from each country benefit each other. The problem here is advertising is their major income and why ratings count. During popular shows like breaking bad for example TV stations would have been paid through the roof for an advertising slot because they know they are getting their products shown to the most people during those slots, but why would an American or British advert benefit in other countries? They don't and its a damn good shame because sometimes there are shows here in the UK that have great ratings, I believe The Sarah Connor Chronicles is an example where I heard that it had poor ratings in the USA while here in the UK it was loved with good viewing numbers and that was on sky (our main sat TV system) so it would probably done even better if it was shown on terrestrial tv .

5. Far too many TV stations!!!! Here analogue is dead and we now only have digital terrestrial TV which alone has probably about 100 channels, then there is sky which I mentioned earlier and TiVo from virgin and more which has hundred's upon hundreds of channels, mostly full of repeats mind you but of good shows so people stick to the channels they know not giving the numerous (in most cases not needed) new channels a chance because they are using the same damn repeats but there are the few that actually have something new and could be good but is lost in the list of those numerous channels we skip by every day.

6. Some do get noticed with good marketing, they look great they get the chance to grow but sometimes they genuinely just are rubbish and they are canned.

7. The one that really fuxing annoys me and is another reason I use the net to watch only what I want...... REALITY fecking TV !!!!!! I'm sick of hearing about talentless morons filling our TV slots.
People go out and work hard and train to act while we get a bunch of god damn muppets that our moron filled nations are attracted to flies like $hite. Enough of this cheap crap, gone are the days of talent like John Cleese with Fawlty towers (American? Never seen this? Go now and I mean now and you will laugh so much you will fall off your seat)

8. Originality (Dead)

reply

Agreed! 100%. Darn.😠

reply

@ cmother1, In your opinion nothing more. The ratings etc.. prove you to be wrong. Also looking at the terrible feedback your reviews and threads get, you really are the last person anyone is gong to listen too.

I suggest you go back to writing reviews and thread nobody likes or agrees with:)

reply

Too low ratings for such an expensive show regardless of the all-star cast and huge promotion it received.

People can be such hypocrites.

They whine, whine, whine, and whine some more for originality on TV and when it does come, they skip it.

They also whine incessantly for more racially diverse casts but again, they skip it.

Passenger side, lighting the sky
Always the first star that I find
You're my satellite...

reply

[deleted]

Good shows always get cancelled. That's bad but true.
Flashforward, come back!!!

reply

Acting was mostly good:
Demetri Noh - great character
Lloyd Simcoe - just amazing
Dr. Olivia Benford - past believable, I think the best role at least until ep. 13
Aaron Stark - perfectly done
Nicole and dr. Varley both have a great buildup

Zoey Andata - well I don't like her/role but still doesn't ruin the show
Simon Campos - looks spot on, although I never liked the actor
Janis Hawk - I have some problems with the character


I don't like it's sooo politically correct, all color, hetero and gay, autistic kid, everything...

But the show was great. No idea why they cut it.

reply

Networks dont realize this sort of attitude to cancel a show is why alot of people cant be bothered with some of these sci fi genre shows like resurrection walking dead etc They dont seem to go anywhere or are cancelled with no notice.
To not have a conclusion for FF just shows contempt for the viewer.

reply

harn-michael nailed it. The scheduling by ABC was horrible, that long break was a really bad idea, the ratings just didn't justify a renewal. While I really liked the show, it did have some problems I think: too many major characters, some eye-rolling moments that were done to stop plots from being resolved (i.e. the destruction of the mad scientist's board of information) etc. I think a second season could have worked out the kinks, sorry this was cancelled.

reply