Rushmore was boring despite its qualities because it wanted to annoy the viewer into submission, Bill Murray is the best thing since sliced bread but in Wes Anderson movies he is somehow turned into a Gene Hackman imitator or worse, a bland humorless being. It IS an achievement to suck the life out of someone so exceptional and I suppose it was a novelty for Murray himself to finally be dull. Submarine is better than Rushmore because it's less pretentious and less controlled whereas Anderson tries to kill all spontaneity in his films, I know that it is kind of cool but he is so self-conscious that he falls into a kind of safety zone of a music video or a perfume ad. ("Hey, lets all throw away our expensive luggage because we're so damn rich!") Submarine does remind you of Rushmore but it has more life in it; when its young hero screws up and abandons his girlfriend in her hour of need it rings true and the movie allows doubt to creep in. This is the difference, Wes Anderson is just flippant, that's why his films never really satisfy; this is the mark of a true snob. I came out of this film with a smile.
They were both conceived with the intention of completely dry humor. Some people like american humor some people like english humor, some people like both. I like both movies and treat them both as equals, they had great humor made by brilliant crews the like. I agree that Wes anderson is slipping though, Bottle rocket and Rushmore were solid, but his last few attempts were a little too "in-jokey", tried to be too high-brow, and just ended up hit and miss in my opinion. (Fantastic Mr. Fox was awesome though, but im a hardcore animation nerd)
You're just plain wrong. Rushmore is a classic comedy and highly satisfying. Submarine is neither funny or particularly dramatic, it has almost zero stakes for the characters. I simply didn't care about them or where the story was taking them. I didn't for one minute buy the main character being driven to save his parents' marriage. I loathed the girlfriend and actually felt glad when he bailed on her, which seems to me the classic sign of a bad movie seeing as I was obviously supposed to care at that point.
In contrast, Rushmore is one of the most elegantly paced films I've seen. I don't think anyone could argue that Submarine is better edited, it just isn't. Perhaps my biggest problem with Submarine though is its world. I just couldn't believe that this mass-scale playground bullying was occuring with characters old enough to be having romantic relationships. Maybe I hold it to a more subjective standard (because I'm a Brit) but I've just never met anyone with experiences of such blatant bullying occuring much beyond the age of 12. Sure teens always have their conflicts and nasty encounters, but everyone crowding round in a circle to laugh like mad folk? It was ludicrous.
Rushmore does that fantastic thing that only the best comedies do, it makes you laugh at its protagonist but root for them at the same time. Oliver certainly had his dimensions but my reaction to him was basically indifference. I'll also say that personally I'm not a fan of the plodding "indie" music score and lens flarey cinematography of Submarine, it just amounts to a bland tone to go with its bland story.
Are you comparing Submarine to Rushmore or Wes Anderson's entire career? I stopped watching his films after The Life Aquatic because I'm not good with disappointment.
Though I liked Submarine, I agree 100% that Rushmore was better. In fact it gets better every time I watch it, another sign of a good movie. But I feel the need to comment and say give Moonrise Kingdom a chance. It's really good. Darjeeling Limited is one to skip though, that was terrible, and this is coming from a huge Anderson fan
"This is a $4000 sofa upholstered in Italian silk. Its not just a couch" "ITS JUST A COUCH!"
I don't know where/when you went to school, but my memories of being 14/15 years old coincide pretty well with the playground bullying that happened in the film. In fact I specifically remember hiding peoples bags, teasing people about relationships, their weight or their parents or whatever (yes I was a bellend), and I definitely remember crowding round and jeering whenever a fight kicked off. 15 year olds are idiots, they're just slightly taller idiots than 12 years olds. Those are my memories of school anyway...
Rushmore just felt more original when it cameout, both films are fantastic and certainly took a lot from Hal Ashby of what Mike Nichols did with The Graduate
Overall, I think Rushmore is the better picture because it's story goes to more places, this film is just as well shot and acted, but it really just kinda sits there, luckily the craft is so good that you are engaged.
I liked Rushmore much more than this film. Rushmore kept me engaged and interested at all times which Submarine failed to do at times. I could watch Rushmore a thousand times and never get sick of it, however one viewing of this movie felt like enough for me.. Not saying Submarine is bad.. Just that I prefer Rushmore to it.
Thought it was Anderson's weakest film, a heavy-handed Altman reference - Nashville (Blanchett's perf a reference to Geraldine Chaplin's journalist) - if you like Altman's stuff - which many do unequivicably - why not? I find the whole 70's drugged-up violent whimsy thing often shallow and depressing (that said, I remember loving MaCabe and Mrs. Miller and Harold and Maude), he definitely got the tone right in terms of a cinematic reference or hommage, otherwise the deadpan stuff was more painful and unfunny to me. Would have liked the film more if it had delivered what the trailer promised: a film about an expedition to kill a shark based purely on revenge, good line in the trailer which falls flat in the film. The whole film seemed over-whelmed paradoxically by self-loathing and self-adoration, if you hang out with stoners for a short while you'll see the profile again and again, this kind of incredible superiority that takes hold of the average loser once he's smoked his potential and life away, but still manages to feel above all the other 'fools'. Smiley Face by Gregg Araki nailed the whole thing perfectly. Just for the record, er, isn't this post supposed to be about Submarine, I wonder if everyone is writing about Submarine on the Rushmore page?, okay, well I actually loved Moonrise Kingdom and thought Anderson delivered his best film yet, for those put off by, say Darjeeling or The life Aquatic, it's worth tuning back in. By the way, to the guy who posted this reply, no hard feelings, I'm glad you found The Life Aquatic satisfying we're all free to have our own opinions and taste, in French they say two things you shouldn't discuss are taste and colours because we all experience things differently, there's no point getting angry and saying 'you're wrong!' even if we think it's true, we're not going to change how they feel about a film and even the best of friends can fail to agree on a film, a song, a painting or a book. Happy movies to you all!
I liked SUBMARINE, thought it was clever and funny, and I liked the fact that it wasn't your typical predictable teen coming-of-age story. Loved the look of it,enjoyed the music, everything about it. Director/writer Richard Ayoade (whom I liked on THE IT CROWD) really did himself proud with this film. It'll be interesting to see what he comes up with next. I will be hunting down the DVD of this,for certain.