pretty funny

how uptight and determined people are to see one love interest as "winning" and the other one eternally doomed to never have a chance with bo, so there.

sorry, but it's weird how people want it to be either/or and not both. maybe the "teams" thing has gone too far, maybe they can't stand the idea of bo being with anyone but "their character," dunno. but it's very silly. lots of books (cassandra clare's "clockwork" books) have this idea re: immortals and mortals in a love triangle, where the immortal ones get together after the mortal dies, so why are supposedly open-minded people freaking out at the idea that lauren is going to die someday, and bo might get with her previous lover? why does it bother you? do you feel you didn't "win" over the other team if your favored character isn't the ONLY ONE who does?

oh, and to people declaring that there is 0% of a bo/dyson reunion someday, if that were true the writers/showrunners would not have had the reconciliation scene with lauren and dyson. yes, they don't literally have lauren say "i want you to be romantically with bo after i die," but the subtext is so obvious and blatant. and the topic doesn't come from a vacuum, they were discussing bo's love with lauren, and lauren's comment grows out of that. they are talking about love and romance, so it doesn't follow that lauren would be immediately saying, "i know you'll look after her in a completely protective way, with no possibility of romance."

if there was 0%, that comment would never have been made, bc it very deliberately leaves the door open for that and acknowledges that it is a real possibility that bo and dyson will reunite someday. if it were 0% chance, they would not have included that comment of lauren's in a conversation about love and romance. please stop pretending that the comment exists in a vacuum, and that subtextual meaning doesn't exist in dialogue.