What makes a bad movie good...
When you are talking about the worst movies of all time, I Frankenstein ranks higher than Sharknado. Why? Because the people who made Sharknado KNEW they were making a bad movie and played up the camp to get laughs (much like the Scary movie spin-offs). I Frankstein was made to be a quality picture but failed spectacularly. The studios spent $65 MILLION to make this stinker. Just think about the flaws in this movie that make it hilariously inept. The scene where there is an American cop trying to arrest 'Adam' made me laugh harder than anything in Sharknado. Why? Because this was CLEARLY set in Europe and not USA. Gargoyles and demons fighting in the streets was lame and atrocious yet unintentionally hilarious. Why? Because there is not one person to be seen in a sprawling modern European city. Didn't anyone wake up to see flames in the night sky or walk to work the next morning and wonder why there were so many piles of ash everywhere? What about the church. It exists for hundreds of years and no civilian bothers to actually walk inside? In 200 years, Naberious couldn't have got one person to infiltrate the church and steal Frankenstein's scientific journal? What about the fact that the gargoyles didn't realise that Naberious' palace was just across the road from the church? They couldn't figure that one out yet 'Adam' can just walk past security to get inside?
These are just little examples that make a bad movie good. Sharknado is a bad movie no doubt, but that's it. It's not funny bad. You read the title and you've already seen the movie.
If insane outnumbered sane, would sane then be considered insane?