MovieChat Forums > Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011) Discussion > Why is Bumblebee the only one that 'look...

Why is Bumblebee the only one that 'looks real'?

posted 11 years ago by soulsk8ter225
5 replies | jump to latest

I don't know how to explain this, but Bumblebee really gives off a non-CGI look for some reason. Maybe it's his color scheme or lack of an actual appearance of a face (besides the eyes), or at least since he doesn't really move his mouth. Whatever it is, every other Autobot and Decepticon really has the noticeable CGI look to them.

I don't know which way I'm asking this... why B looks more real or why the others don't look as real. Either way, does anybody else agree?

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

[–] NoReasonToLive 11 years ago

Yeah right

[–] soulsk8ter225 11 years ago

So... you do or don't agree?

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

[–] Kuato_and_George 11 years ago

I never really noticed him vs. the rest of the effects, but I personally find that the effects of these movies inexplicably got worse with each one. The transformers, explosions, and just about every other effect looks faker with each new film.

For my latest movie reviews and news:http://www.hesaidshesaidreviewsite.com/

[–] soulsk8ter225 11 years ago

This I can agree with.

Actually, ROTF looks worse than DOTM in my opinion. They still have this "faker" look to them as they go, though.

AOE might look even worse. It's just a different style compared to the very first one. In fact, the only strange looking thing in the first one was when Bonecrusher tackled Optimus, and that was purely in animation alone (the direction which he went at him looks different from the direction which he hits him).

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]