Here’s The 1993 Woody Allen Custody Ruling In Its Damning, Detailed Entirety

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/heres-the-1993-woody-alle_b_4746866

the ruling by Justice Elliott Wilk paints a particularly damning portrayal of Allen the father, describing him as “self-absorbed, untrustworthy and insensitive,” and undercuts the claims that Farrow was “brainwashed” by her mother into inventing the tale of her sexual molestation.

Wilk’s ruling also calls into question the credibility of the much-cited Yale New Haven Hospital study, released Friday by Radar Online, that concluded that Allen did not molest Farrow and suggested that Farrow was either coached by her mother or merely a vulnerable child who fabricated her claims.

Specifically, Wilk writes:

1. “There is no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen’s contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan” or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi. Mr. Allen's resort to the stereotypical "woman scorned" defense is an injudicious attempt to DIVERT ATTENTION from his failure to act as a responsible parent.

2014-02-07-nocrediblewomanscorned.png

2. The Yale New Haven study report is “sanitized and, therefore, less credible” owing to a variety of factors.

2014-02-07-YNH2.png

3. Mia Farrow was “not faultless as a parent,” but, “ironically,” her “principal shortcoming with respect to responsible parenting appears to have been her continued relationship with Mr. Allen.”

2014-02-07-mianotfaultless.png

4. Allen’s “self-absorption” and “lack of judgment and his commitment to the continuation of his divisive assault...warrant a careful monitoring of his future contact with the children.”

Mr. Allen's response to Dylan's claim of sexual abuse was an attack upon Ms. Farrow,
whose parenting ability and emotional stability he impugned without the support of any
significant credible evidence. His trial strategy has been to separate his children from
their brothers and sisters; to turn the children against their mother; to divide adopted
children from biological children; to incite the family against their household help; and to
set household employees against each other. His SELF-ABSORPTION, his LACK of JUDGEMENT, and his commitment to the continuation of his divisive assault, thereby impeding the healing of the injuries that he has already caused, warrant a careful monitoring of his future contact with the children.


2014-02-07-selfabsorption.png


5. Ultimately, “we will probably never know what occurred on August 4, 1992...[but] Mr. Allen’s behavior toward Dylan was grossly inappropriate and...measures must be taken to protect her.”