Odd, because I've seen four of Farhadi's films, and none of them really fit Nicrobliz' description.
I guess I could almost kind of see the "melodrama" thing - there is a lot of conflict and arguing in his films. Of course, I don't think "melodrama" is inherently a bad thing - and in this case, I would say his films are some of the most realistic portrayal of human relationships in modern film. There's usually no single huge decision or action that sets things off. I've seen very few films that are as good at showing how the accumulation of passing comments and small lies tend to have the biggest effects on our lives. That's much more true to life than what you see in most movies, I think.
As for the implication of misogyny... I think he's pretty even-handed in how he treats his male and female characters. A Separation is a master class in how to treat all the opposing sides in a debate with equal respect and criticism. They all come out dirty, but they all have valid points-of-view.
And, really, I can't even begin to imagine how much better television would be if the average TV movie was even half as complex and humane and sophisticated as a film like A Separation or About Elly.
So no, I'd say that Nicrobliz is mostly wrong and the "made-for-TV comment" is just generic, nonsensical piffle used to condemn any movie that isn't as stylistically in-your-face as, say, the average Tarantino film.
For the record, I also love Iranian cinema. I would agree that Farhadi isn't Kiarostami or Ghobadi or Panahi or Makhmalbaf - but he doesn't need to be.
reply
share