Rises is not a 'bad' film per-say; but the biggest flaw it has is it stretches the acceptability of the attempt at maintaining an illusion of realism that its predecessors had and entered into a more surreal (comic book like) experience. This was jarring; and then combined with the bad pacing (slow, the fast, then super slow, then super extreme fast) and Nolan's over use of heavy exposition dialogue made it an overall disappointing experience.
Many of the things that bothered those like me that didn't like it are not really full on plot holes but they do stretch believably when compared with the realism of Begins and DK. Such as Bruce getting back to Gotham in less than a month with no passport, id, money, resources and not even knowing where he is at on the planet. It is not a plot hole but it is pretty hard to accept.
One of my gripes (other than how plodding the pacing is) is the giant flaming bat symbol. At the end of TDK, Batman was supposed to take the blame for the death of Harvey Dent, Gotham's White Knight. Given that would make him Gotham City's public enemy #1, how are the people supposed to react when they learn of his return?
I may not be understanding your gripe here. At that time of the film when he does the bat symbol it is after Gordon was exposed for lying about Dent; so everyone in Gotham knew Dent murdered people and batman took the heat for it so the criminals would stay in prison. If anything that would make the people revere/appreciate batman more.
The actual act of wasting time doing the bat symbol when the freaking bomb was about to go off is something to gripe about. Especially since 'the people' didn't need inspiration to fight, because they didn't fight; the cops in the sewers fought and it wasn't to inspire them since they were in the freaking sewers at the time. the fire bat symbol thing was just dumb and done only for cheap visual/emotional effect
>I may not be understanding your gripe here. At that time of the film when he does the bat symbol it is after Gordon was exposed for lying about Dent; so everyone in Gotham knew Dent murdered people and batman took the heat for it so the criminals would stay in prison. If anything that would make the people revere/appreciate batman more.
Good point. I've no intention of watching the movie.
Gripe 2: Bats, all suited up, standing on ice which we know can't support the weight of regular guys moments before.
"Gripe 2: Bats, all suited up, standing on ice which we know can't support the weight of regular guys moments before."
Stuff like that I think is a bit nitpicking; sure it i annoying but can easily be waved off. The stuff that can't be waved off is like Bane being reduced to a glorified henchman/body guard in the last 5 minutes of the film. Or the magic kneebrace that allows batman to kick through walls but then forgotten about for the rest of the film (even when Bruce is left in the pit, I think we are to assume that it was left on by Bane, which begs the question of why) or the fact that Bruce had a broken back (lower lumbar dislocation and gets it punched back into place and does some pushups and is suddenly able to climb and jump with extremely high conditioning all in under 1 year; this stuff is really, really hard to accept.
But for me the thing that really killed my enjoyment was the pacing; it is a very badly paced film (slow to fast back to super crawling slow to super fast then rushed falling action that seemed like a frame by frame check in the box sequence). That was just bad.
I hated the pacing. It's a superhero movie where the superhero spends most of his time in a hole. Here is an incredibly powerful fusion reactor/whatever that can easily blow up. Dead centre of the city is obviously the best place to keep it. We hold up a stock-exchange at gun point, of course all transactions are legit... the list goes on.
It is not just that he is in a whole for so long in the film; but the way that they framed the elapsing of time. The slow burn and build up would not be a problem but they already did that once in the beginning (When Bruce is getting ready to become Batman again). So the film starts slow, then speeds up to fast until the confrontation with Bane, then it transitions back to really super slow for the scenes in the pit and the year in Gotham, than as the bomb going of gets closer the speed start to accelerate too fast until you are in the last 15 minutes which is neck break fast pace. This is not good pacing at all. Return of the King is a great example of how to pace a 3rd movie; there are scenes in which the characters are talking and slowing down to make plans or motivate each other; but they way they are framed they don't actually slow the pacing down.
"We hold up a stock-exchange at gun point, of course all transactions are legit"
oh yeah, that was pretty dumb; and counter productive too. It is well established that the only way Bruce can do the Batman thing is because he is disgustingly rich. If he is not rich he could not be batman anymore.
Rises isn't the primary movie that tried to combine realism with surrealism. Begins did that. People called it realism, but they were wrong. That realism aspect of the trilogy was amplified by TDK which went full realism. But in reality, Rises touched on the same combination that Begins initiated.
We had Bruce traveling to the far East, training and learning what's basically magic kinda/sorta disguised as chemistry. Rises didn't have that. Rises did have Bruce returning to Gotham with no resources, but we already experienced that in Begins. And in Begins you could argue he was lacking experience whereas in Rises he had all the tools required.
Rises is really just Begins part 2, but in tone and not story.
" Begins did that. People called it realism, but they were wrong."
Why, there is nothing about Begins that really stretches realism into surreal all that much that I picked up. The weaponized hallucinogen is a bit much but not 'realism' breaking; the mass humidifier thing is also possible.
"We had Bruce traveling to the far East, training and learning what's basically magic kinda/sorta disguised as chemistry."
I am not sure what you mean by this; the art of ninjutsu is a real martial arts form; the chemical wasn't magic it was a hallucinogenic toxin derived from a plant; that created predictable responses out of the affected person. No such plant exists but similar drugs do; so that is not really that unrealistic. stretching realism sure but I don't see it crossing into surreal like rises does.
" Rises did have Bruce returning to Gotham with no resources, we already experienced that in Begins"
In Begins he had unlimited time; not 23 days like in Rises. Also Bruce did not get back to Gotham in Begins without resources; Alfred meet him in Country with a Jet and they flew back to Gotham together. Literally all he needed to do was get to a phone a call Alfred in Begins. He did not have that resource in Rises. He literally had nothing; no money, no friends, no family, no identification and no way to get back without attracting attention. in Rises he just doesn't get back, but from what we can tell he does it completely on his own without anyone noticing. That is no longer realism that is surrealism.
"Why, there is nothing about Begins that really stretches realism into surreal all that much that I picked up."
The effects of the hallucinogens are surreal as there is no actual plants like that, but I agree it's not full surrealism and never claimed it was. It's a mixture of the two. And I can say the same about Rises.
"I am not sure what you mean by this; the art of ninjutsu is a real martial arts form; the chemical wasn't magic it was a hallucinogenic toxin derived from a plant;"
But those hallucinogenic effects were 100% in the realm of surrealism. There are no actual plants that can work the way Scarecrow used them. The fact that it doesn't matter and we don't care about that is indicative of the movie's somewhat surreal nature.
"In Begins he had unlimited time; not 23 days like in Rises."
I don't care if it took 3 days. He's Bruce Wayne. All he has to do is walk to the nearest populated city to find out where he is and also find someone that recognizes him.
"Alfred meet him in Country with a Jet and they flew back to Gotham together."
I don't know exactly what "Alfred meet him in Country" means but it sounds like you're saying Alfred somehow found out where Bruce was across the world and got him a jet ride back. If that's possible, 23 days doesn't mean anything in Rises.
"in Rises he just doesn't get back, but from what we can tell he does it completely on his own without anyone noticing."
We've already established that getting back was well within Bruce's ability due to his resources that extend beyond what he's personally carrying at the time. We also know the guy is sneaky. He entered Gotham without Bane finding out when Bane thought he was imprisoned or dead. Bane sneaked into Gotham without Batman knowing so... yeah.
"From what we can tell" just isn't enough to get me on board with the idea that Rises was more surreal than fictitious plants causing extraordinary effects.
Both are definitely in the wheelhouse of comics though, so I'll just leave it at that.
"I don't care if it took 3 days. He's Bruce Wayne. All he has to do is walk to the nearest populated city to find out where he is and also find someone that recognizes him."
The "he's batman he can do it" argument is not a good argument. He had no resources, no money and no ID. Just to get a passport to be able to get back into the U.S. would take weeks. Remember he lost almost all his money earlier in the film so no unlimited money to circumvent the process. No private jet; no help from anyone. How did he get back to Gotham; Walk? Drive? How long would it take him to get from the pit to somewhere he can speak the language. There are hundreds of thousands of dialects in rural areas across the world, there is a very low chance he knows the local's language. Where is the nearest populated city? Who knows him and can help him get a passport in under 3 weeks to get back into the U.S. No matter which way you slice it, the 23 day limitation was a silly thing to put on the film. If the amount of time that he had to get back was not disclosed it would not have been as much of a problem; but 23 days? No it is not possible without flying and he can't fly without a passport and no way to prove who he is. You have to assume so many variables to even make it somewhat possible.
"I don't know exactly what "Alfred meet him in Country" "
Go back and watch the film; Bruce does NOT get back to Gotham on his own after leaving the League of Shadows. The next scene shows him walking up to Alfred in a Airport on the runway, clearly this shows he contacted Alfred and had him bring the jet to pick him up. Bruce no longer had the jet or Alfred in Rises. He had nothing, no resources and no help.
"The "he's batman he can do it" argument is not a good argument. He had no resources, no money and no ID. Just to get a passport to be able to get back into the U.S. would take weeks. Remember he lost almost all his money earlier in the film so no unlimited money to circumvent the process. No private jet; no help from anyone. How did he get back to Gotham; Walk? Drive? How long would it take him to get from the pit to somewhere he can speak the language. There are hundreds of thousands of dialects in rural areas across the world, there is a very low chance he knows the local's language. Where is the nearest populated city? Who knows him and can help him get a passport in under 3 weeks to get back into the U.S. No matter which way you slice it, the 23 day limitation was a silly thing to put on the film. If the amount of time that he had to get back was not disclosed it would not have been as much of a problem; but 23 days? No it is not possible without flying and he can't fly without a passport and no way to prove who he is. You have to assume so many variables to even make it somewhat possible."
None of that describes surrealism. Those details are left out of films all the time, and none of them become surreal for it.
"Go back and watch the film; Bruce does NOT get back to Gotham on his own after leaving the League of Shadows. The next scene shows him walking up to Alfred in a Airport on the runway, clearly this shows he contacted Alfred and had him bring the jet to pick him up. Bruce no longer had the jet or Alfred in Rises. He had nothing, no resources and no help."
You assume he had no help because the movie didn't hand-feed it to you. And the lack of hand-feeding has made you declare the film surreal. That is an ignorant jump in logic.
"None of that describes surrealism. Those details are left out of films all the time, and none of them become surreal for it."
Surrealism is anything that breaks from the 'effort' at maintaining realism. Begins and Dark Knight maintained this realism; there are no missing details based in realism that can fill in the gap of how he got back in such a short time with no id, no resource, no help and no money; therefor it violated that 'theme' of realism and entered into surrealism. What detail can be filled in to answer how it could have been done in a realistic way? The film just made too many limitations for him to overcome in such a short time realistically.
"You assume he had no help because the movie didn't hand-feed it to you."
Who helped him than? The film specifically shows he alignated all his 'allies' and reasource. The "hand-feed" comment is condescending as hell; and is a fallacy. You can't just say when asked "how was it done" that "the filmmakers didn't spoon feed it to you" that is a cop out not an argument. Answer who it was done realistically or drop the condescending bullshit. Pisses me off when I see crap like that.
"That is an ignorant jump in logic."
well okay, can't answer so you rely on ad hominems. and yet condescendingly you try to suggest I am dumb for 'not getting it' and making "ignorant jumps in logic" all non arguments.
"it sounds like you're saying Alfred somehow found out where Bruce was across the world and got him a jet ride back
No, in this case all Bruce had to do was call him and then Alfred could make all the arrangements. This kind of goes without saying. Bruce did not have this option in Rises.
"We've already established that getting back was well within Bruce's ability due to his resources that extend beyond what he's personally carrying at the time."
No, we specifically didn't establish this because Bruce did NOT get back to Gotham on his own in Begins and in Rises he only had 23 days in total. There is no realistic way he could get back in 23 days. Not without flying, which he can't do without an ID and passport. He could do this if he was still a billionaire (money talks) but Rises goes (stupidly) out of the way to show him lose all his money earlier in the film. So no money.
"We also know the guy is sneaky"
sneaky does not equal super speed. This has nothing to do with out fast he got back to Gotham without explanation.
"surreal than fictitious plants causing extraordinary effects."
You ever been on LSD? The plants basically just caused a 'focused' bad trip. He it stretches realism but not the same way that time and human anatomy is in Rises.
"No, in this case all Bruce had to do was call him and then Alfred could make all the arrangements. This kind of goes without saying. Bruce did not have this option in Rises."
But you don't know what other options Bruce had. You assume he had none. And your assumption has made you believe the outcome was surreal. It is an ignorant jump in logic. You can call it something else, shoddy filmmaking perhaps, but it's certainly not jarring surrealism unlike its predecessors.
"You ever been on LSD? The plants basically just caused a 'focused' bad trip. He it stretches realism but not the same way that time and human anatomy is in Rises."
There's no such thing as a bad trip that is that focused and that guaranteed, and certainly not one that is instantly curable with an antidote. Not LSD. Not DMT. It's all too random to accomplish the effects in Begins. But is it impossible? We don't know. We don't know if it was impossible for Bruce to return to Gotham unnoticed either.
You're grasping at straws here. Both films had the same level of limited surrealism. Rises did not take it to a different level.
What happened is TDK refrained from the surrealism present in Begins and made you think the surrealism was never part of the trilogy until Rises came along. And because you overlooked that surrealism and have delved so deep in your argument against Rises, you stubbornly refuse to accept that the surrealism was present in Begins.
"But you don't know what other options Bruce had. You assume he had none"
No the film specifically goes out of the way to show that Bruce no longer had resources. Were you not watching the same film. He pushed away Alfred, he was broken, he lost all his money, he was removed from Wayne enterprises, Gordon didn't know his real identity, and Fox and Blake were occupied. What options did he have available? If you can't come up with one either, then it is not an assumption.
" It is an ignorant jump in logic"
drop the condescending bullshit non argument. It is pissing me off.
"There's no such thing as a bad trip that is that focused and that guaranteed"
it stretches realism; just like the cape material he uses stretches realism it doesn't break it; at least as far as I am concerned. It is okay to stretch realism but you should cross the line; rises does.
"You're grasping at straws here."
Can you make a single paragraph with a condescending comment; jesus.
"Both films had the same level of limited surrealism."
I disagree; if you only proof of this is Begins had the weaponized hallucinogenic compound; I think you are wrong. It stretches realism; it doesn't cross into surreal. What other elements of Begins do you have to support your claim it is 'as surreal' as Rises?
"What happened is TDK refrained from the surrealism present in Begins"
I agree that TDK holds the line of 'Realism' a bit better, except the visualized Sonar system that he uses at the end; the tech really, really stretches realism and I might concede that it enters into surrealism. But still not as obviously as Rises does.
"have delved so deep in your argument against Rises"
You have not made a convincing argument (mostly just condescension and non-arguments) to contest my argument; that is not me being deep in my argument; that is you not being convincing.
"you stubbornly refuse to accept that the surrealism was present in Begins"
You were trying to express the notion that Bruce's return to Gotham made Rises too surreal. I agree if you compare it with TDK. But then you tried to express that it's too surreal compared to Begins.
That's where you got stuck. Your way out was to admit Rises' surrealism is similar to Begins, and TDK being in the middle made it sort of a rollercoaster.
Instead, you wanted a long drawn-out argument over it.
I agree, Bruce making it back to Gotham is a non issue, there clearly was civilization not too far from the pit and knowing what has been established about his character that is within his abilities. You don’t have to make any kind of leap in logic to connect Bruce from the pit to Gotham and he had over three weeks to make it back. It’s not like he teleported thousands of miles across an entire continent in a matter of hours with an invisible car that sprouted out of the ground.
" It’s not like he teleported thousands of miles across an entire continent in a matter of hours with an invisible car that sprouted out of the ground."
He is complaining about Indy and Henry in Indiana Jones and the last crusade getting from Berlin to HAtay in a day; which they were not in Berlin and there is no proof that it was the next day. Also this nonsense about 'invisible car'. The last scene just showed Indy steal a car and in Europe in the 1930 there was 300 cars per 1000 people (and that does not include motorcycles) Indy could have easily acquired another car within 5 mile of their location give or take. The hypocrisy of moviechatuser497 claiming it is a plot hole in the last crusade but not in Dark Knight rises is the result of deluded fanaticism. I wouldn't start agreeing with such insanity.
I've pretty much said what I had to say. It's impossible to convince me Rises surrealism was a stark contrast to Begins when it's very clearly TDK that is the odd film out.
And since it appears you have a beef with the guy above, I'll just take this opportunity to step out.
Okay, I can fully agree that Begins approaches surrealism more than TDK and Rises (I would say) is the actual 'spiritual' successor of Begins. I think I get your meaning better now; but in my analysis and understanding of realism vs surrealism Rises takes it to a whole new level of stretching acceptable realism that even Begins did not 'sink' to. some small elements of Begins can be defined as surreal; but not entire plot points that move the story forward like Rises has. Bruce traveling from the pit to Gotham with no money, no id, no resource, and no assistance (that we know of) in less than 23 days is impossible and begs to have an explanation for what makes it possible. The hallucinogenic compound of Begins, despite being somewhat surreal, got an explanation of its existence (it comes from a plant that grows in that area only); Rises didn't bother with doing any explanation of the impossible things that happened.
Oh yeah there is a history with this guy; he is a lunatic on this subject and he mass replies and bullies people that disagree with him. I have had PM's with 7 users that have informed me that he does this crap routinely. 7 different users; that is a sign this person is toxic.
Hypocrite! you bitched about me bringing Dark Knight rises into your B.S. Last Crusade post and now you do the same for my Dark Knight post. Get bent loser.
I disagree with your claim that Begins is surreal to the same degree. To convince me you have to make a compelling argument. YOu have not; the hallucinagenic substance is not enough to qualify Begins as surreal; not in the same way that Bruce getting back to gotham in such a short time with no resources is at least. And you have not made a compelling argument to counter my claim either.
As for moviechatuser497 'counter argument' there is no indication that the village near the pit was populated. It looks deserted. Even if it wasn't, there is no guarantee anyone would help him let alone him be able to speak the language to ask for a ride to an embassy. and even if he did; he has no identification on him and no passport and no money to bypass the system and get documentation quickly. He would be at the embassy waiting for weeks to get a passport.
"knowing what has been established about his character that is within his abilities. "
one of the biggest enablers of his abilities was his unlimited wealth and reasources. HE NO LONGER HAD THOSE because stupidly Rises decided to 'up the stakes' by taking that all away from him. When before did Bruce get across the planet in less than a month with no resources. He was traveling for years in Begins; that leaves plenty of time for him to get from place to place without those resources. In Rises the time limit just makes it beyond acceptable realism. Hence why I call it an example of surreal.
>I don't care if it took 3 days. He's Bruce Wayne. All he has to do is walk to the nearest populated city to find out where he is and also find someone that recognizes him.
Get real. He's not an international celebrity. How many people would recognise, say, Jeff Bozos or Elon Musk if they were in rags in the local neighourhood, let alone a city in the Middle East?
All we needed to see is Bruce winning a random pit fight against a random person and collecting the winnings, the audience can see he's fighting fit and obtaining money. It's the job of the movie to provide the narrative, not the people who watch it.
Just watch Batman begins and that will answer all of your questions. Did you need to see Bruce Wayne take a dump? I mean if they don’t show it I guess that means he didn’t take a dump for 23 days. We don’t need to be shown everything the franchise provides enough about the character that it’s logical he could have made it to Gotham this complaint is ridiculous and just shows a lack of intelligence on the part of the haters
Exactly, all it really is a matter of is getting himself on a plane or ship and then he’s back in the US the next day, seeing how he’s a master of theatricality and deception stowing away wouldn’t be a big challenge for him.
It reminds me of all the times we see Batman standing in place, the camera moves away for a second then goes back to him, and he's gone without a trace. Sometimes a person will be talking to him, and he just vanishes as they are looking at him. How did he do that? The movie doesn't explain. But it doesn't matter because he's Batman.
And that explains how he could have stowed away on a plane out of India back to the United States. Remember Ras al Ghul taught him how to be “truly invisible”
He could have snuck on, he’s a master of theatricality and deception who has the ability to blend with his surroundings that’s the basic philosophy of the ninja
So somehow he either:
Evaded security at *both* airports, on take off and landing, while hiding on board somewhere without being detected, or:
Snuck on board a ship with enough food and supplies to survive several days at sea, somehow avoid being detected by the crew and again, avoid being detected at security at both ports.
You know, you raise good points, but I think more important is that it would have been nice, story-wise, to have some context for how Wayne did it. Just a hint in some dialogue or something would have been nice. We just have to assume he did it.
On some level, it's not important exactly how he ingeniously hauled himself back to Gotham, but to dismiss it enitrely with a gesture is a bit dissatisfying.
Of course, the film was a bit longish anyway, so maybe they felt they didn't have the minutes to spare.
We already know Bruce is an industrialist so it's no stretch of the imagination to have him phone one of his business partners for a lift back; this would add seconds at most to the runtime just to show this.
Maybe Bruce's own pride stopped him... he is Batman after all. Besides, Bane prevented anything happening to Gotham which is kinda the main plot of the movie...
2 movies, maybe, it will deal with a lot of the pacing issues.
" 23 days is ample time for him to get anywhere he wants to go. "
No, Wrong he has no ID, no passport and no money. it is not just getting to a plane or ship; he wouldn't be allowed to just enter the U.S. without identification he would prove who he was and then wait for his passport to process (minimum of 4 weeks). If he was still a billionaire he would be able to 'bypass' the wait process; but rises goes out of the way to show that he was no longer a billionaire.
Also if it was a ship it is about an 18 day trip across the Atlantic (for example 24 days from Port of Alexandra to Port New York and about a 60 day trip across the Pacific; And that is depended on him finding a ship heading that way within a couple of days after escaping, sneaking on and surviving without food for almost 3 weeks but then being in fighting condition when he arrives. There is no way to get around this, it stretches realism to the max and IMO it crosses the line.
Of course all of this depends on where the pit was which the film does say; but it is clearly somewhere very remote and third world. it would have to be somewhere in Central America for him to make it back in time; literally any other place on the planet and he does make it.
This is why I argue it is surreal (breaks from realism).
Yeah; Bane being reduced to glorified henchman/body guard in the last 5 minutes only to accomplish the goal of the poorly contrived miranda tate/Talia Al Guhl 'twist' (come on, who didn't see this coming? they even cast the actress that always plays a traitorous character). That was pretty bad
Bane wasn’t really working for me as a whole to begin with. Then they throw that curveball. I didn’t swing at it, I rolled my eyes, shrugged and stepped aside.
For me it was not just Bane; literally none of the characters were working for me in Rises. Hathaway as catwoman was unconvincing, Oldman as Gordon was almost like a different character (confused and almost senile in his dialogue and actions), Miranda Tate was a snooze feast that was clarity going to betray Bruce (if you didn't see it coming than you don't know movies, it was pretty on the nose), Alfred was a blobbing baby the whole film (and he is basically not present for a majority of the film, same as Lucius Fox hardly had any role.) Blake was a total misfire (a half Robin type character that they never pull the trigger on, cop that is disgusted using a gun? give me a break), and then there is Bruce/Batman who just had way, way too much self indulgent screen time and this self important framing (this was in Begins as well but they rightfully moved away from it to put the focus on the story in Dark knight; but then the indulgent focus on Bruce Wayne and his 'emotions' and motivations returns in Rises).
There is actually very few things I liked about this film. if I was to rate it subjectively I would give it a 3 or 4 out of 10. If I rated it objectively I think it deserves a 6 or 7 out of 10; but this is not a film that deserves to be rated above 75%.
I didn’t mean to imply that I liked anything about the film. I agree on all points but I remember nothing about Gordon or Fox. I’ve watched it once all the way through and bits and pieces since. No desire to revisit.
Maybe a 2.5/5 for me. Though, it might be good enough for a 3 but I enjoyed it closer to a 2.
yeah that is about a fair score a 3/5. Is about right; if I am being really generous I might say 3.5/5. It is definitely overrated and many 'fans' are way too forgiving and complete ignore the flaws; and also argue against criticism with sophistry and insults, which is annoying (much like The Force Awakens defenders).