I've noticed that Nolan haters are generally very stupid

NolanTARDS are SNOBS

They love proclaiming that The Dark Knight, in being so “realistic,” is somehow the most true to the dark, psychologically intense world of Batman. They say this because:

(a) They want to convince themselves that Batman comics really are intended to be this realistic and intense and

(b) They want to convince others that what they read is so realistic and intense so that they can feel less embarrassment at still reading them in their 20s and 30s. The reason they overrate that movie so much is because so much personal validation is tied into that movie for them. So the more realistic the movies are, the more comic fans will claim to anyone who will listen that they just witness a movie that is exactly like the books they’ve been mocked for reading for decades."

There’s not much to understand. His films are typically a boring, structural mess with characters who are nearly impossible to root for. Nolan simply isn’t the “genius director” that his fans want him to be, and that’s okay. It doesn’t mean that you guys have to shit on people who have a different opinion. And look, if in 40 years people are STILL talking about his movies (which I doubt very, very much), then we can revisit the “Christopher Nolan is a genius” talk. For now, though, all you have are a few well-shot commercial flicks, not cinematic masterpieces.

The Batman movies are certainly Nolan's lesser movies... His other ones are far superior aesthetically, emotionally and conceptualy... Momento, Inception, Dunkirk, Interstellar... all tower above the spandex series, i.e, his batman trilogy...

The Dark Knight, while one of the best comic movies out there is still just a comic book movie... It's not at the level of mastery of say Paul Verhoeven's Robocop, which as a true classic trancends it's genre..