MovieChat Forums > The Perfect Host (2011) Discussion > You think he'd deposit his victims furth...

You think he'd deposit his victims further away


I couldn't tell if he treated all his "victims" the same way but why leave John right outside his place in the alley?

Might John not come back once he realized he'd been had and do something violent to the host guy (LOL. I just watched this and I can't remember the character's first name and I don't feel like looking back at the credit).

Anyway, my point is he could have driven John way far away and ditched him while he was still under the influence and with no cell phone or car or money John probably wouldn't have been able to get back too quickly (assuming he could find the place again)

reply

I guess he didn't feel like driving to deposit him. But I would think that he would have as well. I couldn't believe it when I saw John just lying there in the trash.





"Well, yeah, they're baby-eating badasses man, what more do you need to know?"

reply

Since i don't think he's ever killed anyone, i don't think he's ever needed to deposit them anywhere. Some of them might have just been led out the front door.
In John's case, i think dumping him outside like yesterday's garbage was Warwick's intentional way of insulting and dehumanizing him (like when he was calling John "nothing).
If he really did kill John, i don't think he would discarded him outside his house. And if he had dumped previous victims he had no point to get across to, he probably wouldn't have done that either.

reply

He was just mind phuquing them. I think he was looking at the bulletin board in his office and duplicating the pictures with his "crew". The biggest mind phuque was leaving them right near his house. I mean, after all he was the police chief, who'd believe a disoriented person over him....except for Helen Reddy's character....

Swing away, Merrill....Merrill, swing away...

reply