I was a Little Confused


I wasn't sure what to think about all the "relationships" in this movie.

Were Lucienn and Kerruac into each other? There was never any acknowledgement of anything "romantic" between any of them, except they slept in the same bed.

Furthermore, did Lucienn ever care for Allen Ginsberg? He hyperventilated after telling him to leave for good. Hell, we weren't even sure if

This movie "seemed" to have a lot of love triangles, but I couldn't tell for sure.

A million lies to sell yourself is all you ever had

reply

They remained friends throughout their lives, but as far as romantic relationships go, all we know is that Ginsberg was in love with Carr, but Carr did not want a homosexual relationship. It's not clear how far the relationship went since we only have Ginsberg's account of it. Kerouac and Carr sharing a bed was simply convenience in the movie - nothing more was implied. Other than Carr, these guys were all into exploring their sexuality throughout their lives and didn't live by a middle class code of morality. Carr kind of kept out of it after the murder, but the rest of the Beats went on to live very colorful lives.

reply

Didn't Carr have some sort of relationship with David (Dexter's character)?

A million lies to sell yourself is all you ever had

reply

It was implied that they had some sort of relationship, but I don't know if it was sexual in nature. I'm honestly not familiar with the source material (Ginsberg's early diaries and the book written by Kerouac). I think David was mostly just a creepy older man who stalked Carr. I mean, there may have been more to it. Krammerer was obviously very in love with Carr, but Carr was intent on suppressing his sexuality to lead a heterosexual lifestyle.

Basically I agree with everything Rad said.

Watch the film again if you can. This stuff might become more clear again on a second viewing.

Aso, his name is Michael Hall. Let's separate the actor from the character he portrays.)

reply

Allen Ginsberg even said "at one point, you loved him back".

I thought it was quite obvious that there was some sort of romantic thing going on. David says "you said I was everything to you" and then Lucien says "we're over".

A million lies to sell yourself is all you ever had

reply

During the movie and given the history and age difference between Kammerer and Carr, I don't know that you can call what was between them a romantic relationship. There was a weird power play going on between them which seemed to be sexual.

reply

Kammerer definitely wanted to have sex with Carr. He was obsessed with him and followed him all over the place but Carr wasn't into him.

For me, what this movie made a little confusing was Carr's sexuality. Further reading shows Carr identified as totally heterosexual and was never sexually or romantically involved with any men but this film made it seem like the interest was certainly there, even if he didn't act on it. Not sure how accurate that is.

reply

That's not completly true. We know, because Ginsberg wrote about that in his early journals published as " The Boook of Martyrdom and Artifice", that he shared numerous sexual encounters with Carr and with Kammerer too. Lucien Carr was bisexual. At least he had sex with both, men and women during his youth years. But he never has any with Dave. According to what Borrouhgs remember, Dave never told him anything aboy that, and undoubedly Dave would have told his old friend if anything at all had ever happend.

I don't like to label people like this or that. In my opinion, human sexuality is much more complicated tan black and white. Peter Orlovsky shared his life with Ginsberg although he identified himself as heterosexual with only one homosexual relationship. And others members of the Beat Generation as Kerouak or Borroughs had some homosexual affairs. If they were bisexual, homosexual or they were just only exploring, never mind.

Anyway, the important thing in this case is that the sexual life of Carr was silenced in order to protect Lucien in the murderer case, presenting Kammerer as the obsessive, older homosexual man and Carr as his young victim. And it was obviously not true. If it is clear that Kammerer was crazy about Carr, it is too that Carr looked for Kammerer company a lot of times, that they used to hung out together, got drunk in bars and shared their thoughts and ideas about litearture.

From my point of view, after reading diverses resources about this case and the Beat Generation, I think that the relationship between Carr and Kammerer turned poison and sick at one moment and they were trapped in it. And the only posible scape was that one of them die. Carr tried to kill himself once, then, he finaly killed David. As Borroughs said, "They were nice guys, but when they were together always something happend. They form a combination wich gets on everybody's nerves." What happended was just a matter of time.








Sorry for my mistakes. English is not my mother tongue.

reply

According to Caleb Carr, Lucien Carr's son:

Lucien Carr was not gay.

Kerouac was not gay.

Lucien had a great friendship with Kerouac. Ginsberg fell in love with Lucien, Lucien did not reciprocate, and Ginsberg later distorted certain facts out of retaliation and jealousy over Lucien's friendship with Kerouac -- the filmmakers chose to go with Ginsberg's version.

Also (from interview with Caleb Carr):

"...David Kammerer did not begin his obsession...when my father was an adult: it began when my father was only twelve or so, and Kammerer was his Boy Scout troop leader...There are very few moves out of the child predator’s playbook that Kammerer did not use — and all before my father was even out of high school, most before he was out of junior high. So the idea that their relationship was an example of “the love that dare not speak its name” between a young man and an older man is farcical: it was prolonged, sustained child abuse."


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/24/son-of-famous-beat-murderer-lucien-carr-disputes-kill-your-darlings-films-version-of-events/#ixzz2wmDHPPJa








"I will not go gently onto a shelf, degutted, to become a non-book." ~ Bradbury

reply

This film delves into a great deal of depth concerning gay male relationships, both sexually and non-sexually reciprocated. Not all gay men have to have gay sex together. Modernity is the bias that thrusts such an false and absurd ideology on gay film and literature - that being, in order to be a 'f@g' you have to stick your person somewhere 'not hetero-ly' normal for men.

But for many gay men, and many gay readers here - who know such walks of life - there is most certainly ample room to understand the deeper underpinnings of this film, as it mirrors LGBTQ relationships in a whole, and what it is trying to accomplish for the film in terms of illustrating the love between male characters, and the abject falling out of love that happens amongst lovers, and especially gay lovers.

Whether or not Jack Kerouac and Lucienn (in the film) were sexually engaged was not the attempt of envisioning being made here; the point was that they connected on a spiritual and artistic level. The real love story was about Lucienn and David, for they are the story that many gay male circles experience even up to today (right at this moment even) - that being, the love between an older and a younger male (not at all pedophilia for your hetero chumps).

Now there seems to be a lot of misguided straight people here on these board threads trying to translate into heterosexuality the extremities of gay male nuance, but for those who have experienced this walk of life, this film made resounding impression to what goes on in these types of relationships. Ginsberg was the late arrival to the story, but it was his witnessing of that love story between David and Lucienn, and the disapproval of Lucienn's mother, and what can only be surmised as the complete ostracication of David from his family, that makes the story, and the subsequent murder, all the more bittersweet injustice.

This notion even made a great point when it became part of the storyline, when David tells Lucienn right before he thrusts himself on the knife, that he knew what Lucienn felt when he chose to die at the year of 18 in Chicago. This film was not about Allen Ginsberg, or Jack Kerouac, or even about their literary work up to the 21at century. It was in fact, a gay love story, which ended in the death of one the most integral influences of Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac.

reply

Xatian, what evidence is there that Dave Kammerer was

one of the most integral inflences on Ginsberg and Kerouac
? As you suggest.

I have never herad this suggested anywhere before. Kerouac was writing long before this.

reply

Well, considering Kerouac wrote:
And the Hippos were boiled in their tanks (along with Burroughs)
The Town and the City
The Vanity of Duluoz

All containing or specifically about the murder, the first being written before either authors were published, T&C was Kerouac's first published and vanity his last. I'd say he was an influence (of some sort) on the group.

reply

I'd say he was an influence (of some sort) on the group.


I think it was more that his murder by someone they knew was an influence on the group.





And all the pieces matter (The Wire)

reply

Does being murdered make you a literary influence ?

reply

As someone who doesn't know the beat generation to well and probably shouldn't be saying anything, going off of the movie i'd say Lucien cared quite a bit for Allen. The way it seemed to be to me he pushed him away before sailing because he didn't want to get involved in another serious relationship, or possibly be like a David towards him. That all went away when he desperately needed help in court though.

reply