MovieChat Forums > Better Off Ted (2009) Discussion > Better Off Ted analysis: Low-key humor r...

Better Off Ted analysis: Low-key humor recycling


This show is unlike any other I've seen. It took me at least 10-15 episodes to figure out the formula it has established.

It isn't the normal bad sitcom formula, where jokes that completely fall flat are answered with deafening laughter (The Winner, Romantically Challenged, etc.), and I don't mean to say that this is a bad sitcom (though it is far, far from great).

This is totally different, and mostly unique. This show almost never tries jokes that aren't funny at all, but in more than a dozen episodes, I never heard anything that was laugh out loud funny. Not once, and that's odd. You get that at least once or twice or even several times in a single episode of 30 Rock or Arrested Development, two shows that are somewhat like this one (single camera, no laugh track, offbeat humor).

The jokes in this show are all roughly the same. Each one is funny, to some degree, but not even laughing funny, just mildly amusing in a clever (usually) way. Each one makes you sort of smirk along with them. At best that is, no laughing, just smiling along knowingly.

It is almost as if they collected a thousand jokes, then eliminated all the ones that just plain weren't funny, then eliminated all the ones that were hilarious, and used all the ones in between that keep it on an even keel, with that smug, Better Off Ted sniftiness. This has a very low key humor style that I've never seen before (and I can assure you that it won't catch on).

The second part of this formula is humor recycling. In most any episode, they will make a joke, some joke that is funny, but not really funny, sort of 2010 Leno funny, then a few minutes later, use the exact same joke again, then force that once-is-plenty joke into being a running joke. There are many instances of multiple jokes being recycled in the same episode.

One example is the one where Ted explains how he can motivate and get the attention of the scientists:

He says he does this by using the caramels he keeps in his pocket.

Drum roll! Not really.

Then they proceed to reuse that joke ten minutes later when someone else reveals that they are now using caramels to manipulate the scientists. That isn't even a joke, really, but they throw it in anyway, then beat it to death.

Another one that really outlines the humor standard is the one where the employees go to Ted's to hatch a plan (to undo whatever it was the evil corporation was doing, I can't recall, the story lines are forgettable and I've just watched ten of them in three days) but his daughter does not approve because it involves lying.

So, they all agree she is right and say they won't do it, then send her to bed...so they can keep working on the plan anyway!

But wait, there's more... Then Ted throws in that they...wait for it...can also use this opportunity to play with her toys!

Ha! Get it? They're old and they are scheming to play with toys that belong to a child! A lot of them, even the scientists!

See, that isn't even a joke, but they'll play that as the punchline of a scene.

This show is based on an incredibly thin premise, that corporations don't care about people. Yes, that is the whole plot, the whole situation of this situation comedy.

I have to say, incredibly, is that a plot which is a thousand times better is one where a guy can't afford a place in a tight renter's market and is forced to pretend he is gay so that he can live with two women under the management of a guy who doesn't want to do it with his wife or a guy who is always eavesdropping and misunderstanding what he is hearing and hilarity ensues.

Instead of having a song and graphics to start the show, as with every other show in the past 60 years, they have a fake TV commercial from Veridian Dynamics, where they unintentionally show that they don't understand people or value life. The message here is that not only are corporations evil, but they are stupid, too.

The title of the show is very consistent with the low key humor that is repeated forever. The first time you hear the name Better Off Ted, you think about it, and realize that it is a play on words. You didn't laugh, I can assure you of that, but you got the joke. Then you heard the title 50 more times. It makes it a very, very stale joke that wasn't a real zinger in the first place.

Another problem that makes a weak show weaker is talking directly to the camera. In my view, any time a show resorts to talking to the camera as a normal practice, it makes it a lot less funny.

In the first season of Malcolm In the Middle (you remember it, the only good one), it didn't kill the show, but it didn't really advance it.

On Modern Family, it really does almost kill it. It is a recurring thing, never funny, and is never the best part of the show. Modern Family picked up, though, I think, in that it doesn't do those lame jokes while talking to the camera then rub your nose in the lack of laugh track by pausing ten seconds while you squirm on that one joke (Modern Family, The Office, etc.). Now it keeps moving along with more jokes and less pausing to talk to the camera to be clever. That is a big premise hole, as there is no context for each member of this very extended family to be telling a stranger their problems and innermost feelings.

Does anyone else see the formula of this show in a different way or am I missing a big part of what is supposed to be funny about it?

reply

Ok, I don't even know where to start really. There is nothing that can be said to change someones mind about something being funny or not. So that is not my intention with this post. But this show is definitely not low or even mid range in terms of quality. Its quirky, but for the style that it tries to portray its of extremely high quality. There is definitely love put into this show from the writers, that frankly many shows are just missing (Two and half Men I'm looking right at you). The problem is that not many people are interest in the style that this show presents. That is why the ratings are so low.

I guess you just don't like the style of humor used in Arrested Development or this show. Because to me they don't have "ok, that is kind of funny" moments, they have "That was hilarious" moments. Those moments are based on how ridicules the situation the characters are in, and how zany those characters respond to it.

And yes the whole premise of the show is that they work for a giant corporation that doesn't care about people at all. What makes you think that is thin premise? Its as complex as any sitcom that has ever been made. Mash was about Doctors in Vietnam, Seinfeld was about people living in New York (nothing at all really), same with friends, the office is people working in an office. My point you can boil any shows premise down that does mean it doesn't work. They can create many storyline with this premise, so it works.

Its fine if you don't like the show, nothing anyone is going to say will change your mind about that. It plays very differently to the classic comedy style were the jokes are based around their ability to play to the audience. Different strokes for different folks.

reply

Agreed. I personally found the thing with the toys funny. The show's approach to humour is definately my cup of tea

reply

maj15 had said:


"I guess you just don't like the style of humor used in Arrested Development or this show. Because to me they don't have "ok, that is kind of funny" moments, they have "That was hilarious" moments."


I think a lot of people posting on this board would agree that Better Off Ted is almost completely devoid of "that was hilarious" moments. That was my basic point.


mongo324 had said:

"Basically, what you are saying is that you do not like Mel Brooks like comedies? Because that's what this is, though a little toned down for TV and the times. Because everything you lambaste can be traced to his movies....Mel Brooks, Sid Ceasar and Richard Pryor were among the greatest comedic minds of the 2nd half of the 20th century. And between their shows, movies and writings, they have all incorporated these themes."


You make a good point in drawing a parallel here, but there are two basic objections I have to that idea.

One is that Mel Brooks himself has been "a little toned down for...the times" for the last 35 years! If you watched Blazing Saddles and Life Stinks in the same sitting, it would be hard to believe that they came from the same person, and impossible to believe that anyone could have launched themselves into the world of big comedy with Life Stinks. His stuff went from being offensive to almost everyone, to being totally PC. Being in a theater with a PG or R rating, he really wasn't restrained by advertisers and his decline from humor is somewhat inexcusable.

The second is that we are talking about sitcoms and one sitcom versus others, and the "greatest comedic minds of the 2nd half of the 20th century" Mel Brooks, Sid Ceasar and Richard Pryor all combined didn't have half a hand in creating the sitcoms that formed the genre that exists today. Gary Coleman made a larger contribution than the three of them combined. No part of Better Off Ted even exists in the same universe as Richard Pryor, so this irrelevant name-dropping doesn't validate this weak sitcom. You might as well throw in Carl Lewis and Beverly Sills as proof that it's great.

There was a comment about Seinfeld and Murphy Brown that I didn't even understand. I didn't like either so I barely watched them, so I might not be able to understand what the point there was.

reply

Basically, what you are saying is that you do not like Mel Brooks like comedies? Because that's what this is, though a little toned down for TV and the times. Because everything you lambaste can be traced to his movies. All you have to do is watch History of the World pt 1 and you will start seeing parallels all over the place. Talking to the camera ("It's good to be the king"), using the locale itself and what transpires there as a source of humor (the Last Supper scene), little vignettes to poke fun at itself (the closing of the movie where they preview the sequel) and even a hysterical musical number (Veronica singing Rick Astley and M.B.'s "The Inquistion").

Mel Brooks, Sid Ceasar and Richard Pryor were among the greatest comedic minds of the 2nd half of the 20th century. And between their shows, movies and writings, they have all incorporated these themes.

And, as to your point about how all shows have opening theme songs and graphics... How'd that work out for Murphy Brown and Seinfeld?

reply

Kinda agree,never really thought on the fact that I have never really laughed out loud very often on Better off Ted.That being said I enjoyed almost every episode of the show and I'm gonna miss it next season.I guess I'm this shows target audience.

It was about my 4th favorite show this year.

reply

are you a cyborg?

"this wasn't funny and let me tell you why this wasn't funny"

dude, really?


----
Only clowns will play with those balloons.

reply

I have to say, that i laugh out loud at every single episode of BOT. Especially anything Veronica says.

reply

Have to agree with the last poster, there isn't a single episode of BOT that I didn't laugh out loud, pee my pants laugh at. I adored BOT and pray it will get picked up by someone else. I simply haven't laughed at anything in years the way I laughed at this show. Everyone has different taste OP, so this one wasn't yours doesn't mean the rest of us weren't floored.

reply

ahh, gotta say I find the show funny. Love it. Very quirky.

This is my signature. Enjoy. Oh yeah- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGtfSoWFlZ4

reply

me too. i lough out loud and roll over with it.

it's so FUNNY! and clever. i loved the show.

www.somewhereinblog.net/blog/tuklifiedblog

reply

Me too. I sometimes have to go back and listen to what was said after Veronica because I laughed so much :)

"It does not say RSVP on the Statue of Liberty."

reply

Both of your examples are from the same episode, and they aren't really that correct as there is no beating to death of the caramel joke, it is mentioned by Ted that he uses them to control the drones, and Linda says "I have caramels" when she's having trouble leading the group. I agree that some of the jokes, like the one mentioned above, isn't laugh out loud funny, but a lot of them are. Phil and Lem discussing which of them were which of the salt and pepper jars i found really funny.

But I agree, they do a kind of low-key humor that is rarely supposed to be hilarious. The humor for me is more that the entire situation is funny, and they have built up decent quirky characters that react funny. "It's kind of a pre-show ritual / sex-thing.".Actually, every scene with Veronica where she subtly uses her rank to dominate. "That is the sound of courage, and I can't hear it enough. And neither, can any of you." Lem collecting a bunch of black men to make a point, and goes in to Veronicas office saying "Oh no, this looks way too aggressive".

And talking about funny running jokes, how about that goddamn eight-legged bird. "Ah, the octochicken. We had such high hopes for that."

The title, "better off Ted", is honestly kind of lame. It's sort of a wordplay, but it has no meaning other than sounding like better off dead, it doesn't exactly give you an idea of what the show is about. Is the point that its better to be dead than to be in a large cooperation?

reply

Wow, this one has gotten a lot of responses.

The further posts about how truly great Better Off Ted is should be made in past tense, because this barely-funny sitcom has been canceled.

Mark my word, 10 years from now, 80% of the US population will know about Three's Company (the plot and who was in it), and 0% of the US population will know what Better Off Ted was.

By now, it seems that every unemployed Better Off Ted writer has already made a reply on this post, so there should be little added to this string from here on out.

I made my original post on this topic on May 11, 2010. ABC canceled it two days later on May 13, 2010.

Was I right or was I right?

reply

Yes you were right mail because everyone knows the real mark of a good show is whether or not a network executive thinks its good because they are never wrong that is why cable will never catch on(sarcasm off). Three's company was a good show for its time when everyone watched only network tv and you needed a show that appealed to the widest audience possible. Better of Ted is a different type of comedy. I can't believe you are surprised that you come on a board about this show and find people that like it and defend it. What does that say about you? You honestly believe 80% of the US population now remembers Three's Company let alone 10 years from now?

reply

"This show is based on an incredibly thin premise, that corporations don't care about people. Yes, that is the whole plot, the whole situation of this situation comedy."

Yes, if you believe the show has a "thin presmise" as describe, you are missing several levels of what was taking place in this show.

The obvious answer is that you do not, for whatever reason, get this sort of humor. It may be that you are too young, it may be that you don't have the personal experience to connect with this humor, or it may just be too subtle for you. There wasn't been a disappointing episode for me, and most of them contained many laugh-out-loud moments. It's not stand-up comedy, it's not slapstick, it's not over the top.

You have to be able to read between the lines and to see the dynamics and references that go unspoken, as well as to place individual bits of dialogue within the broader context of the show.


You also say:
"That is a big premise hole, as there is no context for each member of this very extended family to be telling a stranger their problems and innermost feelings."

Again, it's clear you simply don't get this show. There is no "premise hole" here. It sounds to me like you're obsessing over this show not being like other shows, and you're not sure cognitively how to deal with it, leading you to evaluate it through the lens of "conventional" programming.

reply

[deleted]