Surprisingly Good


I just watched it on Netflix having avoided it for so long based on all of the negative comments I've seen about the movie and I have to say I really enjoyed it.

The hate seems to come from three different camps. The first thinks the premise is too absurd, I guess they've never seen a movie before and or viewed this as some type of documentary. The second seem to base the hate purely on Josh Peck. I looked him up, apparently he was in a Nick show, which I'd never heard of. In fact, I'd never heard of him, which I guess was better since I had no bias going in. The third group seem to just dislike the movie because it is too pro-America. I guess they'd rather see the movie from Korea's standpoint.

All in all I liked it.

reply

Watching it now and thinking the same thing, it's surprisingly enjoyable. Action is pretty well done and it moves fast. Josh Peck is pretty bad though.

Ok ramblers let's get rambling. http://viendammage.blogspot.com/

reply

I enjoyed it as well. Not sure how people can hate so much. The "implausible" story seems to be everyone's problem. But last time I checked cars don't turn into robots and take over the world in real life either...it's a movie, it's pretend. I didn't have any problems with the character, I too did not know who Josh Peck was, so I was lnt biased going into it. I never saw the original so I can't compare but I enjoyed this movie.

reply

Same here I was avoiding it cuz it looked so bad from the cover and I know how much remakes suck..but it really wasn't half bad for a decent action pop corn flick..Atleast they had a marine who actually seemed to know what he was talking about and train the rest of the wolverines..Unlike the first one where it was just a bunch of high school kids who just figured out how to beat the Russians with no training what so ever..

reply

Not surprisingly, it was terrible.

reply

or just surprisingly bad. A slap in the face of the original. Hollyweird sucks

reply

I couldn't stand it. The premise was straight up BS, with a Russian civil war, a Russian war in Georgia, a new war in the Middle East (or is it the same one as today?), new fighting between North and South Korea, so to solve all of these conflicts the enemies EMP the U.S. and invade.

Somehow, North Korea, which is outnumbered by South Korea by at least 2-1 odds and doesn't even have an economy remotely close to its southern neighbor, is able to fight them and the U.S. while contributing to a concerted invasion of the mainland U.S. Hell, even the intro was confusing, it was like they were describing the set-up of a shooter videogame. First it was all about Russia, then a little bit about the Middle East, then a big giant pan-Eurasian alliance, then all of a sudden the shift focuses on North Korea like they were the main villain all along.

Plus the plot straight-up sucks. The bad guys EMP the U.S., and it's like all of a sudden the entire U.S. military's strategy hinges on one field telephone a mid-level NK officer carries around with him so that the U.S. military can communicate with each other. Number One, the U.S. already has devices that can protect electronics from the blast of an EMP. Number Two, let's say that preposterous concept is true. Just because the U.S. military gets that one phone, doesn't mean they'll be able to communicate with the other military units because THOSE ONES DON'T HAVE PHONES THEMSELVES.

Then there's all the subtexts that Red Dawn was supposed to have. Like the way being a guerrilla fighter tears away at people, and how regular kids becoming guerrillas slowly drives them insane. Then there's collaborators, which the new film couldn't even touch upon. Instead of the dad being a power-hungry bastard who sold out his son, the mayor became "don't shoot my son!" while the son gets unwillingly tagged by the Spetsnaz and decides to give himself up.

Hell, if anything this movie glorifies the life of a guerrilla fighter because everything works out fine and dandy for just about everyone, there's no psychological toll on any of them, they don't execute wounded or prisoners, blah blah blah. All the worst parts of war are basically glossed over, it's like a kid's war movie.

Can't be too careful with all those weirdos running around.

reply

Surprisingly stupid. Pure nonsense.

reply

I, too, enjoyed it! I watch movies for 1 thing, and 1 thing only ... to be entertained! And, yes, this one entertained me! I don't care how "believable" and "true to life" it is! Just let me watch, eat some popcorn, and not want to fall asleep 10 minutes into it!


"I'm gonna hunt for U, I WILL find U, and I will KILL U"! L.Neeson - TAKEN

reply

I just watched this on netflix. good movie

reply

And you're why the majority of modern movies suck. Because you don't give a crap if what you're watching is even good.

The filmmakers put no effort into making this. It was made by people who knew how to sell to stupid people, and you bit/ and you're proud of it.

reply

I liked it. The action sequences were really well directed, and the other elements (acting, script, etc. )got the job done.

Of course, it could have been much better... As it is, the movie is paced like a Cliff's Notes pamphlet, just kind of jumping from sequence to sequence as opposed to telling a story. Character development is mostly non-existent, and as for the Josh Peck thing, the issue isn't the actor, but the fact that they just put some teen star in a completely generic (not to mention annoying) role. The script itself is also very shallow and cookie-cutter...it kind of hits the notes you would expect in this type of movie, but doesn't actually earn them. So, for instance, they'll have hopeful/emotional music while two characters talk solemnly, but the audience doesn't care at all. Or they have this whole "Wolverines" thing, but no one cares since they spend about 3 seconds developing the idea.

Still, it's a good popcorn movie. I wouldn't really even have felt too bad paying for it in theaters.

reply

I didn't much care for the ending, but the movie was basically good.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

[deleted]