Show is a big let down
as it only gives a passing nod to what has the public so fascinated - the number of rich and powerful entangled in the Epstein web, and instead focused on how the Epstein girls were taken advantage of by Epstein.
shareas it only gives a passing nod to what has the public so fascinated - the number of rich and powerful entangled in the Epstein web, and instead focused on how the Epstein girls were taken advantage of by Epstein.
shareThat is disappointing. They way he was enabled by the rich and powerful on both sides of the political fence is probably the most important part of the story.
Good that the victims are being heard from, though.
Just Democrats. Trump saw that he was a creep early on.
The series is based on a book, which was vetted by lawyers. They can say Clinton flew with Epstein because there are records. You can't say Clinton and Prince Andrew were with the girls because it was not proven in court.
Trumps a creep. Guess it took one to know one.
shareTrump banned Epstein from his resort once he learned what Epstein was doing
https://nypost.com/2019/07/09/trump-barred-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-over-sex-assault-court-docs/
Also, he never visited the island or was ever accused of doing anything with any of the girls. I couldn't help but notice the documentary didn't mention that. However, Clinton, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz (and likely others) were so accused, and the documentary could have addressed that, but chose not to other than a passing mention. That is another aspect of the film I don't like - it was selective with the truth (almost to the point of being disengenuous) in order to take a shot at a political figure they don't like, but then appeared to go to lengths to shield those they did. Would have been better if they just aired everything out, and to fend off the lawyers, make clear the distinction between what was alleged and what was proven in court.
The film wasn’t about conspiracy theories , only Epstein and the victims .
The only accused were Scumbag lawyer Dershowitz and Prince Andrew.
I am no fan of Dershowitz, but he left no wiggle room in his denial. That is unusual for an attorney. He might be telling the truth
shareHaving visited the island at least once, and having represented Epstein for some time, he had to have known or seen things. While he may be personally innocent, he's still culpable, with only client/attorney privacy to save him.
shareThe film showed a picture of Donald Trump standing about four feet away from Maxwell and not even looking at her (suggesting there was some illicit connection when there wasn't), but never even mentioned Bill Clinton, who was apparently a frequent flyer on the Lolita Express
https://www.foxnews.com/us/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known
Hell yes the makers had a political agenda and that detracts from the film. It looks like this film was an effort to burn those who couldn't be saved (along with political enemies), and tie off loose ends. This film is a part of the cover up.
The big question - what was on those computers that Epstein disposed of before the raid? What power players are implicated? I am assuming some pretty powerful people as they were able to get to him inside of jail.