I love this adaptation!
Fassbender is perfect as Rochester, the cinematography is moody, dreamy and fantastic, Mia is the best Jane ive seen, etc.
shareFassbender is perfect as Rochester, the cinematography is moody, dreamy and fantastic, Mia is the best Jane ive seen, etc.
shareI don't know if you saw it on tv or in the theater, or what, but the blu ray is a gorgeous transfer - it really does the "fantastic" cinematography and music justice. Carey fukunaga did a superb job, the film holds up under multiple viewings, in fact, invites them.
shareI've only seen it in HD, maybe I'll purchase it in blu ray. I watch it every time I catch it on TV!
shareYes, I don't buy that many blu rays, but if something has a strong visual component, like "Jane Eyre" 2011, and I get a lot from the film, I find it worthwhile. The cinematography (Adriano Goldman), as you said earlier, is really beautiful and the blu ray brings out all the fine detail and subtle lighting and color shadings - it's beautifully done. This is a very cinematic "Jane Eyre" and it makes me feel like I'm entering into that period of time.
"the cinematography is moody, dreamy and fantastic"
I just finished watching this for the third time! And I still absolutely love it. Mia is perfect as Jane, and Michael is perfect as Rochester! I love how Cary captured the Gothic feel of the novel, with the candle light.
It's an absolutely stunning film!
RIP Philip Seymour Hoffman, you will be truly missed.
I agree. They only fault I find is that it is too short. I wish they could've made a mini with these characters and setting. Indeed, Mia has become Jane to me. And I have 9 screen adaptations of Jane Eyre so I've watched many portrayals of her.
shareYes, when I think of Jane I also see Mia in my mind's eye, which naturally evokes Michael - those are the performances that connect for me, that stir my imagination. As far as it being too short, I think of the old show biz saying, "always leave them wanting more". There are different challenges and benefits to doing a feature length film vs a mini-series. It would be difficult for me to imagine this film being able to sustain the cinematic care and detail it achieves throughout the length of a mini-series, but it may be possible, but probably quite more expensive. Of course, then you could see Michael Fassbender dressed up as the gypsey fortune teller, etc. As it is, I see this film as a gorgeous gem that reveals some new facet each time I view it - it's cinematic poetry that creates it's own reality. The book has so much to it so any future film or mini-series version could end up finding another whole approach, depending on the creativity of the artists, and, of course, the openness of the public.
shareYes, " cinematic poetry," Carey is fast becoming one of my favorite directors! What he does with the south in True Detective is amazing too.
share"Yes, " cinematic poetry," Carey is fast becoming one of my favorite directors! What he does with the south in True Detective is amazing too."
Just by coincidence I posted about Carey's "True Detective" series and it's impact and then I look back and I see you had posted this right before me. Yes, it's amazing what he's been able to do in "True Detective" - not only is he brilliant and has exquisite taste, he's got incredible confidence and trust in his own judgement. He's going to be one of the greats. When I saw "Jane Eyre" I was blown away by the skill and vision and I immediately went and watched his first film "Sin Nombre", another whole universe, but also done with a masterful touch.
It seems Carey Fukunaga is somewhat a fashion plate, too (and it seems the ladies like him). Here he is modeling and talking about "Jane Eyre" and his fashion sense. He does have a keen eye as he started out as a cinematographer.
http://www.mrporter.com/journal/journal_issue29/2?cm_sp=homepage-_-the interview-_-06091
[deleted]
"I watched this again yesterday. Still love it, same as when I eagerly saw it when it showed up in town (probably while sitting in the same seat at the theater when viewing the 1996 adaptation starring Gainsbourg and Hurt.)"
I wish, like you, I would have seen it in the theater, but on my HD home system it's incredibly transporting as it is. I watch this film whenever I want to be inspired and moved - I consider it a real work of art.
It is a treat, it makes other adaptations boring and flat a mini s would have been a smogasbord!
shareI just finished watching it and I almost couldn't handle the last scene where she touched his hand. It may be the most romantic film I've ever seen.
I can't breathe from all this poetry on screen.
"I can't breathe from all this poetry on screen."
I also found the last scene where she touched his hand very moving. The film is naturalistic, gothic and, as you said, extremely poetic. The structure of the screenplay, the acting, cinematography and music, all work together to really go deep. Yes, I agree, it's incredibly romantic.
[deleted]
Definitely read the book. It's better than any adaptation.
http://currentscene.wordpress.com
What Julie said!
If there aren't any skeletons in a man's closet, there's probably a Bertha in his attic.
Yes, I agree, it's beautifully done - as a film it's exquisite, all the elements.
When it comes to the original source, Bronte's novel, there's no substitute - a movie has to go about things using the strengths and limitations of cinema; it's its own kind of animal. The book is a true classic, and if you haven't read it, you're in for a memorable experience - it does what only literature can do. "Jane Eyre" is of its time while being timeless.
The Zelah Clarke / Timothy Dalton version is still the best imo. BUT...this one has grown on me with a 2nd viewing by leaps and bounds. I very much like Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender as Jane and Rochester! Somehow though, there just wasn't enough of them in this movie. I mean, I wish their version had gotten the mini-series treatment like Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens (I like them too but I think I like Mia/Michael more.) Or this should have been a longer movie.
I also like the girl who played young Jane. She was great.
Edited to add: The problem with this adaptation is that a lot of what was in the book was left out and the scenes that remained seemed skimmed over as well. The cinematography was beautiful. That said, I still pretty much love the Mia/Michael combination and for them alone this will get repeat viewings by me from time to time.