how the hell did Tony rediscover a new element?
I don't get what the hell is going on when Tony is looking at his dad's model and all of a sudden discovers a new element. Can anyone tell me what the hells going on here?
shareI don't get what the hell is going on when Tony is looking at his dad's model and all of a sudden discovers a new element. Can anyone tell me what the hells going on here?
shareHis father hid information about the Element in the diorama for Tony to find Using the streets of the model to represent the Electron shell of the Atom.
shareThank you both for your answers. But I don't get how he was able to create it in his own lab though. He created it with like a laser reflection and a mirror or something.
shareWe're supposed to believe (much like how Tony created a miniature ARC reactor from a box of scraps) that Tony built a particle accelerator or collider. And that was how he "bumped" one element into the one his father knew must exist but couldn't manufacture himself.
This is quite a leap full of "yeah but" things (like someone posted here about the fact that Tony would have been glowing and radioactive) but isn't entirely outside of realism. Many of the elements on the current periodic table were first believed to exist and then proven to exist.
Without getting too science-y (someone will rip holes in this who has a PhD or something), in theory you could build bigger and bigger elements just by adding Protons (and then balancing appropriately) but the energy needed to do so is presumed not to exist. At the same time, physicists will tell you that it's not impossible that within a black hole there are elements we never dreamed of.
Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)
Even if he could create a new element why in the world would his dad hide it in a model of a city? Why wouldn't he announce the existence of the new element himself? Its like Einstein coming up with the theory of relativity but doing nothing with it, instead hiding it somewhere hoping that someday a future resident of his house would find it after his death and propose it to the world...
Even more far fetched is how could it possibly be the cure to a problem his dad would never know his son would have?? Its like the biggest hole in a script ever.
Even more far fetched is how could it possibly be the cure to a problem his dad would never know his son would have?? Its like the biggest hole in a script ever.
Agreed. I can force myself to ignore Rhodes being suddenly an expert iron man from his first try, even though we saw Tony struggle for a while through the first movie to get the basic mechanics. But the element hidden by daddy Stark in the city map model, revealed with a hologram technology that didn't exist at his time, and which happens to heal Tony's deadly condition, acquired years after his father's death? No man, I simply cannot suspend disbelief on this one, it just bugs the Hell out of me.
shareThe hologram is simply the technology that Tony uses to explore the information in the model. He could have done it with a pencil and paper, or in his head, or on a computer screen. None of those would be as visually interesting as a hologram.
The sequence of events regarding the arc reactor are:
1. Howard Stark invents it.
2. It's not cost effective with the elements available to him.
3. He hides the info about an element which would work in a map for his son.
4. Stark Industries builds an arc reactor to "shut up the hippies." Still not cost effective.
5. Tony is forced to build an arc reactor in a cave.
6. The arc reactor is killing him.
7. He discovers his father's info from #3. The way to make arc reactors work properly, also coincidentally happens to save his life.
All of these things follow logically. Why do you need to suspend disbelief?
I can force myself to ignore Rhodes being suddenly an expert iron man from his first try, even though we saw Tony struggle for a while through the first movie to get the basic mechanics.
"Even more far fetched is how could it possibly be the cure to a problem his dad would never know his son would have?? Its like the biggest hole in a script ever."
No, the arc reactor had already been invented. Howard knew it had limited potential. The cure is to turn the arc reactor into something civilization can use. Since Tony had adapted that technology to stay alive, the improved arc reactor had an additional, fortuitous benefit.
I don't get it either. You cannot "discover" a new element. All the known elements are on the Periodic Table. An element is made up of atoms and is defined by the number of protons in the nucleus. The current Table goes up to 118. Many of the 3-digit ones have only been synthesized in labs and usually decay pretty quickly.
Tony Stark's new "element" was supposed to be stable and would not decay.
AND, that model he created was made up of multiple, different sized and shaped components. An element is only made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons.
What they should have said was that he discovered and created a new "molecule". A molecule is made up of two or more atoms that are bonded together. In the model he created, each of the different components would then represent the different atoms that make up the new molecule.
The "prismatic Accelerator"=Particle accelerator Tony used the Accelerator to create the particle by bombarding the target with a stream of particles that is how they create artificial elements.
The setup Tony put together was unrealistic and would have made the mansion radioactive and gave Tony a lethal dose of radiation.
Hmmm.....okay. Thanks :).
shareI know, it's pretty far-fetched. You just have to tell yourself it's a comic book movie sometimes.
shareyou know what could've worked? Tony could have gone to the Stark Expo for help, or to use an experimental collider that was established in one line of exposition earlier in the movie. That would've tied it all together thematically to the expo, rather than it returning simply as an action set piece
share"Pretty" far fetched?? That's the understatement of the millennium. It was kind of played as a 'his dad knew all along' but how could he know his son would have that kind of issue later on? Maybe he could have predicted cancer or he lost an arm in a car crash (although even that is ridiculous) but shrapnel being kept away from his heart with an electro magnet inadvertently causing poisoning? He's certainly clairvoyant if he can predict that.
shareIf you’ll remember in the first Cpt America, Howard Sark was working with a piece of the Tesseract. He showed Tony how to make a similar element with the charts and notes his father left him. Pretty sure that’s it.
shareDude, the problem is not whether Howard discovered the element in Captain America or not, that's agreed. No the trouble, as perfectly stated by OP, is how Tony REDISCOVERS it. The answer is by making a hologram version of Howard's old city map model, and by enhancing the Globe at its center, mixing it with a few other stuff from the landscape, taking out others completely randomly, then one last massive zoom and Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo!! An extremely complex and detailed molecule appears...😑
However you look at it, this is a massive WTF moment. You can choose to ignore it, but don't pretend that it makes any sense with the movie. That sort of technology didn't even nearly exist at Howard's time for crying out loud! It's like how Batman solves the riddles in the 1966 movie, except here the tone is not comedy...
I know it's a cop-out answer, but, that's Tony Stark's REAL superpower. He comes up with technology almost nobody else can emulate. He can put something together in a cave a whole team of engineers can't do.
Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgment. -Michael Corleone
While this is an interesting idea and I really like it, it doesn't fit here. Had Tony discovered this element on his own, even by the craziest chance, I would have accepted it with no problem.
But here you're asked to believe that Tony's dad left him this element INSIDE the city map model Unisphere, it is what makes and composes the sphere model when digitalized and enlarged. Did papa Stark leave it there by accident, something as complex as this? Or did he somehow knew what would happen in the future, before holograms even existed? Also remember that Tony says "I'm discovering... correction rediscovering a new element" and also "dead for almost 20 years and still taking me to school". It is a massive WTF moment my friend.
Hey very nice try though, I'll remember this theory about Tony's "superpower".
I think it's pretty clear that Howard Stark realizes the fix for the limited use arc reactor is an element he can't synthesize with the technology of his time. So he hides what he knows about the element in the map, knowing that even if the model gets destroyed, maps of the Expo will survive. Sure, it's a stretch, but it's very visual. Better than finding a notebook and Tony works it out in his head. The hologram isn't necessary to discovering the element, it's just a nice visual to help the audience along.
shareYou are all slow. The element is vibranium. This is confirmed in later movies.
shareThe element is vibranium. This is confirmed in later movies.
It's unobtanium, you lout.
_____________________
I'm your Huckleberry.