I mean, according to Boogeyman 2...those who have seen it know who the killer is...(and it's not a "real" Boogeyman like the first one).
The girl (Audrey) in the beginning saying that the Boogeyman has killed her father (who's the doctor from Hillbridge hospital).
Uh...so.....I'm really confused. I seen the sequel and then this crap... I'm still confused.
Anyone can explain this, please?
The only thing it has in common is the very beginning or the first 20 mins or so really. Otherwise its a completely different movie altogheter.
B-Horror King
They tried to tie in the supernatural first one with the non-supernatural second one. Not sure it worked, but they did try.
shareThey tried to tie in the supernatural first one with the non-supernatural second one. Not sure it worked, but they did try.
I think what the main girl tries to explain to her teacher is that the Boogeyman in the second film was just a person, but it was the legend of the Boogeyman that was also to blame. It was also the events of the second film that caused the rebirth of the Boogeyman in the 3rd film. She explains that whether it is the Boogeyman himself or someone pretending to be the Boogeyman, each gives strength to the Boogeyman legend.
"Why would I save a world I no longer have any steak in?"
"Do it for meat."
Yes its completed related to the second film. Both are crap.
**Accio Harry's virginity!**
I think since Henry was never captured, and police think Laura did it, i supose some people could say that was a real Boogeyman if they beleive on Laura's innocence... But well yeah it do tied up a little bit since Audrey is the daughter of Dr Allen...
share