This oddly coloured dirtyish rag of a flick doesn't deserve more than a 5.
my vote history:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur13767631/ratings
I don't know if I would score a 5, but 7.6 is indeed too high for this movie
shareJust finished watching it and I'd give it a 2 because I'm feeling generous. A very dull and dumb movie. I watched it because I've been enjoying McConaughey in True Detective and previous to that Mud, but this Lifetime tv of a movie belongs in a trashcan.
shareI think this run-of-the mill legal procedural is a 6/10 based on the performances, but I respect others' viewpoints – and the fact that most people gave it 7 or 8 (rather than 10 or 1) shows me that most folks are sincere in their votes.
shareIncredibly contrived with viewer expected to go with the huge leaps in plausibility - average at best!
shareYea, I was pretty dissapointed too. The book was much better (obviously)
shareI give you a 1 for lack of perception. This was a great film, 7.6 is spot on.
shareYou may give, I don't accept this one.
It's not a good flick by any means. It does feel quite odd but it doesn't help it. The actors also suck.
my vote history:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur13767631/ratings
Its a decently entertaining film with good performances all around.
Its that man again!!
It was steadily heading towards a 7..until Roulet revealed he was indeed the killer...after that it spiralled down, down, down..
share