So a girl, a bottle of alcohol and a newspaper could take down an alien
spoilers
alien ship but the US military couldn't? gtfo. no clue how people think this was good.
spoilers
alien ship but the US military couldn't? gtfo. no clue how people think this was good.
I liked the movie, but that was kind of ridiculous and hard to believe. If it were that easy, how is it much of a fight for our military?
shareIt seems Michelle found the monster's Achilles' heel. The monsters catch fire easily from their "inside". This is why she chose to go to Houston and bring "combat help".
shareIf you notice the alien was organic but had a metal shield covering it likely to protect itself against attacks.
But Michelle throws it into the creature's mouth, catching fire from the inside where the poisonous gas was being released. Thats most likely what caused it to explode.
Mad Max: Fury Road > Every Other Action Film
She aimed and timed it perfectly like she'd reloaded in a video game. The actress probably couldn't hit the broad side of a shopping complex.
share10 Tool-Assisted-Speedrun Lane
imo
Multiverse theory. In all the other parallel universes she misses. We just happen to be watching a movie filmed in the one universe where she makes the shot.
shareIf that was enough to justify this terrible, terrible ending to what was up to the point she escaped a reasonable film, then good for you. I think it went retarded when she started making her suit to be honest.
shareThe radio said that we've taken back the entire southern half of the United States, so obviously they could and did.
shareYeah, obviously these aliens aren't invincible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z55W6ihUY-c
Moderators are terrorists.
Yeah I got that, but why the hell did the aliens get the upper hand if this girl took down a ship on her very first attempt. I'd like to think (hope) the US military could to the same.
shareI think it's plausible that an alien surprise attack could result in large swaths of the USA falling into alien hands.
The primary focus of the U.S. military is projecting force abroad. They are not organized, equipped, or deployed in an optimal way to stop a foreign invasion of the mainland. Despite the large size of the U.S. military, the U.S. is not a heavily garrisoned country; there's virtually no military presence in most cities and you can travel through large swaths of the countryside without even seeing a military base. Also, recall that after the 9/11 attacks, it was revealed that large areas of the country simply don't have active fast-reaction air-defense coverage. This has now been addressed to some degree, but it's geared towards a 9/11 style event, and it's easy to see how sending up 2 F-16s wouldn't necessarily help much against a huge alien invasion.
One interesting angle: If a hypothetical alien invasion force appeared over the Dead Sea, they would probably encounter much less initial success than they would over the U.S., because the national defenses of Israel and Jordan ARE set up to counter a sudden invasion preceded by a massive aerial onslaught; troops are dispersed, there are garrisons in or near major population centers, certain forces are on permanent alert, there are plans in place to move heavy armored forces anywhere in the country on very short notice, and fighter aircraft are kept in underground armored bunkers rather than parked out in the open. The main question is how long it would take the two countries to decide to cooperate with one another!
Well at least it wasn't something as dorky as water *cough* Signs *cough*
shareI know.
The whole thing is almost as stupid as making a movie where some kid from back of beyond nowhere who's only weapons training is "Shooting Whomp Rats back home." pilots a ship he's never flown or even seen before and leads a group of professional military pilots into a fight in space where he (by himself) destroys a planet destroying space station the size of a small moon with only ONE shot.
How effin stupid is THAT plot point.
I guess next time the directors of both these two films start another project, They will have to make sure they hire you as Technical Advisor.
"THE WIZARD OF OZ".... Two women fighting over a pair of shoes
Totally different styles of movies. No one is going to make the same type of critiques of a movie like Labyrinth vs a movie like Lincoln.
And Luke Skywalker is essentially magical and has magical powers. That's in the plot.
All in all you're an idiot, and not clever.
The Force is weak with this one.
Peace is not the absence of affliction, but the presence of God. ~Author Unknown
If you closely watch the scene in question. You will see Michelle turn around and notice that the green gas which is floating around in the background near the boundary of the cornfield explodes when it comes in contact with the burning bits of the bunker which are lying on the ground.
Michelle turns back around and it's obvious that she also notices the same gas around the Alien "mouth or opening"
You can clearly see by her expression, that she suddenly "Has an idea". Maybe if she can find something to burn she can put it in the opening and the gas will explode on the inside.
Michelle did not know if this would work or not... But it was worth a shot.
I Don't think that all this made the plot of this movie farfetched, stupid or unrealistic.
My sarcastic reply was to that point. A lot of movies have things that happen which seem impossible but sometimes that's what makes it exciting. Why is it one movie were unlikely things happen is great, and in another movie it's dumb.
The fact that a movie has aliens in it to begin with makes it unrealistic.
This girl escapes a madman in a bunker only to find out that aliens have attacked. Yeah like THAT could really happen. Of course it wouldn't really happen. But it's a movie.
This girl blows up a alien with a bottle of Scotch. Like THAT could really happen. Maybe, maybe not. It's a movie.
Guess she didn't like the cornbread either.
"destroys a planet destroying space station the size of a small moon with only ONE shot." - if you have seen rogue One you'll now know how/why one shot could blow up the space station.
sharei think its the ol case of studio execs vs. writers. The studio execs say we need a big insane crazy scary monster. The writers say.....uh.. sure but then the thing with the molotov cocktail gets sillly . and the studio execs say so what we need a big insane crazy monster.
really it would have been better if they made the alien monster human size but weird scary looking and with some setbacks like it can't move too fast or something...then the whole molotov cocktail would have made sense. i somehow think the writers had it like this but
were not only forced to change it but by punishment of career destruction must not let on that the studio execs pushed their hand for the silly stuff.
Back in the day when i was growing up in the seventies we watched alien movies-mostly from
the fifties-where the aliens usually were less powerful. Mostly it was because they didnt have much money and the studio execs wouldnt give much money just said have it in the theaters by tuesday!!! However in someways it worked cause the aliens would be freaky and yet also plausibly able to be destroyed. i guess.
we shook our fists at the punishing rain
& WE CALLED UPON THE AUTHOR TO EXPLAIN!!!!!
Nick Cave!
sharePoop! I thought it was a The Big Sleep reference.
shareThere was a Big Sleep reference?
shareNot in the movie, but in the post:
WE CALLED UPON THE AUTHOR TO EXPLAIN!!!!!
While working on the script, writers William Faulkner and Leigh Brackett couldn't figure out from the novel who murdered a particular character. So they phoned Raymond Chandler, who angrily told them the answer was right there in the book. They shrugged and returned to their work. Chandler soon phoned to say that he looked at the book himself and couldn't figure out who killed the character, so he left it up to them to decide. In the original cut, shown to the armed services, this question is resolved; in the film as released, it isn't.share
I'd heard the story about the Big Sleep. Murder writers do this a lot I suspect.
Agatha Christie I think it was wrote the whole book then found the least likely person that could have done it and made it them. A lazy formula once established.