MovieChat Forums > Cold in July (2014) Discussion > Deeply sarcastic comedy

Deeply sarcastic comedy


It is hilarious how many people here don't realise that this film is made as one giant mickey-take. Deadpan sarcasm, irony and satire so post-modern that it intends to pass muster (with the hard of thinking) as the very thing it references.

Of course, philosophers may ask that if no-one realises they are supposed to laugh, is it still comedic?

Did none of you notice that our 'hero' had not the slightest motivation to involve himself with the 'roughs', or their emerging (and deeply hilarious) 'motivation' to murder the son because of his involvement with the 'snuff' video film business. Did no-one notice the brilliant use of bad period-style 'music'- the equivalent of referencing porno movies from the 70s by their iconic 'music' choices?

What about the droll moment where our 'hero' uses entirely the wrong kind of modern tire-iron as a potential weapon, where the director asks the actor to be as uncomfortable as possible with the 'prop'- not knowing whether to use it as a 'throwing star', world's stupidest knuckle-duster, or try to swing it from one end (this is a meta-joke predicated on a director being too 'stupid' to interpret the details of his own script).

The closing sequence where 'our' guys set fire to a location completely unrelated to the establishing shot of a giant stone mansion complex, and then our 'hero' returns home to strip off his 'manly' elements and go lie with his wife and son should have helped more discerning viewers reach absolute certainty about the true intentions of the director.

PS did you notice the magazine our hero picks up from his coffee table for some 'relaxed' reading when he first returns home from his trip to the 'farm'? The writer and director must have been in hysterics at the thought of all the people who would take the film seriously.

reply

All's I know is that some parts felt like bad acting. I do hope to try my hand at making a movie someday. But until then, I will give ratings to movies while doing other forms of entertainment. I give this movie a 6/10.

reply

This film was SO BAD in every way that you need to imagine it bring terrible was some kind of intentional irony?

reply

Nice attempt at trying to sound smarter than you actually are. And you analyzed the film very wrong. It's just a throwback to character based southern crime thrillers of the 80s and 90s.

reply

It is hilarious how many people here don't realise that this film is made as one giant mickey-take. Deadpan sarcasm, irony and satire so post-modern that it intends to pass muster (with the hard of thinking) as the very thing it references.

'So postmodern'?? Is postmodernism a quantifiable commodity now? How postmodern!
Of course, philosophers may ask that if no-one realises they are supposed to laugh, is it still comedic?

Conversely, they may ask, 'if one laughs when one is not supposed to, is it still comedic?'
Did none of you notice that our 'hero' had not the slightest motivation to involve himself with the 'roughs', or their emerging (and deeply hilarious) 'motivation' to murder the son because of his involvement with the 'snuff' video film business. Did no-one notice the brilliant use of bad period-style 'music'- the equivalent of referencing porno movies from the 70s by their iconic 'music' choices?

Yes, dozens of people noticed this, but you somehow managed to bypass those comments and reviews in the rush to make yours. I suppose here you're making some kind of brilliant 'meta joke' on reviewers being too stupid to realise the details of their own reviews, right?

If it was designed to be a through-and-through comedy, then I'm sorry, but it was seriously misjudged and fell flat on its face. The 'comedic' moments, such as they were (Jim Bob's slapstick fights with the big guy, Richard's counting to ten while waiting to strike), were crude, fitful and cack-handed.

I suspect the real hilarity lies in your delusional tirade. What I still can't fathom is, since you seem to be under the belief that no one was supposed to latch onto the film's comedic genius, why would you then be so incredulous that no one 'got it'? Are you suggesting that the measure of the film's success, moreover it's prime aim, is not in being popular and profitable, but in making some sophomoric in-joke for the amusement of a coterie of self-congratulatory twerps such as yourself? The biggest joke is your idea that the director would be laughing at people who didn't get his satirical genius. He must have been more interested in making a 'hilarious' in-joke than a successful film.

~.~
There were three of us in this marriage
http://www.imdb.com/list/ze4EduNaQ-s/

reply

why are so many people making statements about the hero having no motivation to go after the son and his gang? after watching the snuff film, if a normal empathetic human didn't feel like killing the people responsible, even if to just stop it from occurring again there would be something wrong w/them. i personally feel it was a karmic comment by lansdale. this is why i don't care for zombies, vampires or any other movie monsters any more, real humans are far scarier.

reply

You just sound pretentious, dude...

reply

THANK YOU! I was laughing my ass off having a great time with the retro-90s cheesiness. And everyone here is bitching. The fact is that no matter how well you prepare for an accurate depiction of a time period, it just won't look perfect and I think the makers of this knew that and used it to their advantage.

reply

Deeply sarcastic comedy
Comedy how? I don't see anything laughable.

reply

After reading the responses, well done.

reply