Guy hated it but it sounds like he was looking for Parks & Recreation Andy or the Guardians of the Galaxy character. Don’t think that’s what the Terminal List was going for. I have to check it out for myself

reply

User reviewers on IMDb said it's good and that Pratt was great in it.

reply

I used the be very interested in the thoughts of professional movie critics. Over the last few years however, I’ve noticed their political opinions seeping into their reviews. When you read a critique but you perceive an “agenda,” you just can’t trust what you’re reading. So, the audience reviews and likes have become more helpful at least to me

reply

lol user reviews. It has a terrible score of 40 on metacritic. Only absolute crap gets that low a score for a tv series. Keep watching garbage if you want.

reply

Metacritic = 9.2
IMDD = 8.2
Rotten Tomatoes = 92%

Only absolute crap gets that low a score for a tv series

Or critics with an agenda

reply

Right now it's at:
Metascore (Critics) 40/100 (bad to mediocre)
Metascore (Audience) 8.5/10 (quite good)
IMDB 7.9/10 (good)
Rotten Tomatoes (Critics) 39% (Critics who recommend watching it are outnumbered 2:3.)
Rotten Tomatoes (Audience) 95% (Audience overwhelmingly recommend it.)
I think it's better than Reacher and FAR better than Jack Ryan.

reply

Okay, cheers, thanks for your permission. In fact I’ll go further and tell a few it’s definitely worth a watch and yes, you have to suspend belief at times but that’s the same with just about everything you watch. Each to their own I suppose.

reply

you're welcome.

reply