MovieChat Forums > Anvil: The Story of Anvil (2009) Discussion > Why didn't they manage to 'make it'?

Why didn't they manage to 'make it'?


It's been a while since I saw this movie but was there an explanation about why Anvil just didn't quite hit the big time?

reply

[deleted]

And how many of their songs were about jewish matzah balls? The overwhelming majority of their songs are about the typical metal/rock subjects, death, sex, pounding on stuff, rock itself.

Their lyrics were no different then any of the superficial songs from the various absurdly popular metal and hair bands that came after them.

Poor management is the only thing that makes sense. They had several solid albums in their early years, should have been more than enough to establish them for life as top dogs of metal. They had numerous tunes that would make AWESOME singles, which in the bad taste plagued world we live in is often all a band needs to sell records. They were/are incredible live, they're incredibly charismatic/fun personalities(at least Lips is).

reply

Because they are playing music nobody likes. Plus old.

reply

what does age have to do with it.....ever heard of Springsteen, AC/DC or The Rolling Stones?

All still very successful and OLD

I love their music BTW. It's because the media hasn't told people to like them. Most people listen to what the media tells them they should. Mindless drones that most people are.

reply

It could be a number of reasons. Maybe they weren't "heavy" enough for the thrash metal fans, and too "heavy" for the glam metal crowd.

Or maybe they just had a crappy record label with crappy distribution. Even back in the day (early 80's) I had no problem finding Anthrax, Raven, Slayer, and Megadeth albums (keep in mind this is BEFORE they all signed with major labels and were still considered "underground"), but I never once saw an Anvil album on the shelves.

Or maybe, as Lemmy from Motorhead implies at the beginning of the film, they just weren't in the right place at the right time.

"Come on, Skip. It's go-go, not cry-cry!"

reply

They didn´t have a sexy frontman.

reply

The lack of a hot looking front man might be one of the biggest reasons. Remember when they first came out it was before the trash scene hit big and since they were to heavy for the glam scene and no hot looking front man they were dead. If they would have come along 5 years later then I believe they would have been huge. My friend had either their first or second album and I thought it was great but then it was like they just disappeared. But yea if they would have come around in 1984 or 1985 as opposed to 1981 we might be talking about the big 5 of thrash metal(Metallica, Slayer, Anthrax, Megadeth and Anvil) instead of the big 4.

reply

[deleted]

I don't know how many of you were totally into that scene back then but some of your time lines are wrong and some don't remember the industry and how it was then. They really were at their biggest in the early eighties before glam if that's what you want to call it hit which was late eighties. They were big when it was a hard rock scene, Scorps, Maiden, Priest, AC/DC Etc... There was not much media hype back then even on the radio which was way different then as well. Radio was always 5 or more years behind what we in High School liked and no MTV or Internet. They were still playing Zeppelin and Styx with a bunch of Journey. We got our media from our bibles which were the magazines all the rockers always had, mainly Circus magazine. Anvil was an opening band and never much more and the main reason was..... They didn't write songs with a hook that the mainstream liked the other bands could. Lots of great bands from then aren't known now or didn't hit it huge because they could only generate maybe one original that people liked and then wrote 10 more that had almost the same chorus.... Mainly the guys that went to every rock show knew and liked Anvil because they had seen them open a show and they had light coverage from the mags. Lot's of bands got screwed by management back then. The companies were few and powerful. Nobody from the outside knew anything about signing contracts. There was no place to get that info. The labels did control the industry completely then and if they didn't hear a single, you were either out or if you had maybe 1 single you were an opener.. It's funny reading kids talk about that time like they were there because of what their dad's told them and then filling in the spaces themselves. There is no way anyone under 35 can know what that time was like because it wasn't around long and MTV along with computers changed media and information. I grew up in Seattle and we had a good music scene even then and a lot of the time we didn't hear about a new RECORD until we walked in the music store. Bottom line, they just couldn't write the right song at the right time. BTW I still play live so I do have just a little knowledge about the time and subject.

reply

I'm 43 yrs old so I know where your coming from. Metallica's first album Kill Em All was only bought if you came across it by accident in the import section of the record store, that is of course if your record store had one. We have a record store here in the Dallas area called Bills Records and tapes and that is mainly what he still sells today. That is where my buddy got a hold of Anvils ALBUM from, not CD but ALBUM. But that is where I first saw a copy of Metallica Kill Em All, W.A.S.P. *beep* Like a Beast, Motley Crue's Too Fast For Love, and that was because your main stream record stores just didn't sell it if it wasn't mainstream enough.

reply

Good to hear from someone who was actually there and remembers..........Not to be self richeous but no one could have a perspective unless they were.....THERE...You were and you rock. Love to hear from a brother.

reply

Bill's record and tapes!! Bought many 45s off him over the years over the Internet!!

myspace.com/bankrupteuropeans

Coz lifes too short to listen to Madlib

reply

Lips also never had a great voice either. I think if they had a really good lead singer and kept Lips at lead guitar and backing vocals they could have made it bigger

reply

Good insight.... That is something I have wondered myself.... Lips is Anvil but he was a better guitar player than a singer.

reply

Too true; if there's no single in there, then the chances are slim and if the sound is off, or if there's not an appealing front man then just those small things out of line can make enough of a bad mix that hurt a band's chances at making it.
I'm a fan of the band Riot from NYC, and they're more popular in Japan than anywhere else. I think they only made one video that appeared on Headbanger's Ball less than a half dozen times. They had a lot of opening band shots in the late 70s and 80s for acts that made it, but never achieved the megastardom either.

I liken Anvil to the Scorpions...one minute singing about sex and the next about rocking, but the difference is when they start going into Dio territory. Singing about dragons and occult *beep* It's REALLY tough to be in a band that does both. Admittedly, I know VERY little about the band having only seen this documentary once and passing them off in the 80's (I turn 35 this year) as another King Kobra, Manowar or Raven, but an attempt to be both Power Metal and Glam Metal is asking for trouble. Why? You gotta get the mix just right if you're gonna make the claim that you're fanatically into Dungeons and Dragons yet getting laid on an above-average basis. I wouldn't know how to market that.
There has to be an absolute finesse in going about it for a band like Judas Priest who could power ballad one minute and sing about sci-fi terminator robots the next.

reply

thomflanagan, I agree with everything you said. It irritates the hell out of me when these kids today - raised on the internet with wikipedia as their bible - think they know about things that happened before they were ever around. It's as if I claimed to know what really happened back in the 60's when the Beatles and Stones were big. I can read all about it and listen to their music all day long, but bottom line - I wasn't THERE. You have to really have been there and experienced the scene first hand to really understand the way things worked. Obviously I wasn't in the very middle of the scene as it happend - I wasn't actually a member of Anvil or those other bands - but I was very familiar with that scene at the time because I was THERE.



Never had a drink that I didn't like; Got a taste of you, threw up all night

reply

You said it best thomflanagan-1. I am 36 and remember that time well. That was the time that influenced me the most as to the type of music that I still listen to. The main 2 ways that I learned of new music was either Circus or Hit Parader magazine, or opening bands at live shows. But you were right about these kids talking about the time like they were there. It was an amazing era to live in: big hair, magazine pages of rock stars covering every inch of my bedroom walls, jean jackets with patches pinned all over them with one big one on the center of the back, pegged jeans, a boombox on the side of the road while skating, and concerts at the local colliseum with real mosh pits that were fun, none of this punching kicking bloody bs they do today. Those days to me were just plain fun. It was all about rocking out and getting laid, and I did both quite often. Thanks for bringing back such great memories.

reply

Timing is everything. I remember back in the day, ANVIL was a "dangerous" band, more associated with the nascent Thrash movement, even though they were a regualr "trad" metal band. I think they were unclear as to either go heavier or go poppier. Some songs on "Metal On Metal" (the only album I own by them) sound like your regular L.A. band from the 80's, yet some tunes (like "March Of The Crabs") display a more aggressive side.

Management, their label, concert promoters and most importantly, the band itself were resposible for not "making" it. They were certainly miles better than some of crud that was coming out of L.A. at the time. Perhaps they should've relocated, but being from Canada I guess it would've been more difficult.

At the same time, there's a point when you just gotta give up. I mean, 30 years is a long wait.

Stay Punk!

reply

what does age have to do with it.....ever heard of Springsteen, AC/DC or The Rolling Stones?

All still very successful and OLD


"still" is the relevant word here. The acts you mention have been huge for decades. The point the person you are replying to is making, is that acts don't BECOME successful at age 50. Especially in the case of Anvil, when they have been trying to make it big for decades and weren't able to get there because they didn't have what it takes. Getting older is not an asset in this looks-oriented business, so one more strike against them.



You must be the change you seek in the world. -- Gandhi

reply

"I love their music BTW. It's because the media hasn't told people to like them. Most people listen to what the media tells them they should. Mindless drones that most people are."

I love their music BTW. Its because the media hasn't told people to like the same music I like. Most people listen to what the media tells them. Mindless drones that most people are.

Fixed for accuracy

The film is a fantastic story of perseverance , family support, and doing what gives you passion in life, and I truly wish the guys from Anvil all the best, but people do have their own musical tastes. IMO, too many songs were average at best. Even Lips admitted, that outside of the first 3 albums, the songs were not up to "speed". Outside of a small percentage of "first album wonders", most rock bands in the 1970's and 1980's took 2-3 records to become really good, albums 4-6 is when Anvil should have been hitting their full stride, but the material just was not good enough during that period.

reply

You are soulless individual and I pity you and anyone unfortunate enough to have a relationship with you.

reply

I think it was because of their location and management.

Slayer, Megadeth, Metallica, Anthrax and such were not "big time" when their first albums came out...and only a few of us heard of them where I lived because of a great record store that would get albums from labels like Megaforce, Music for Nations, and Combat.

Then it started picking up...New York had a growing scene and California blew up...it all started merging in the midwest with bored teenagers (such as myself)...and Canada was left out in the cold (no pun intended).

There were GREAT Canadian bands in the 80's that never really made it...but many of us remember fondly...Anvil, Voivod, Anhilliator (sp?)...and they are still around also.

reply

In reality the answer is nothing to do with bad management or being in the wrong place at the wrong time, its because they are a terrible, terrible band.

Type 'Anvil' in youtube and listen to any of their songs. They are just embarrassingly bad. They had neither the song writing ability of the good pop metal bands (Bon Jovi, Def Leppard, GnR, WASP) or the technical ability of the good thrash bands (Anthrax, Testament, Armoured Saint, Metallica).

Watching this documentary I could help but think that really these guys should have packed it in years ago but they just don't know how to do anything else. It was a tragic story about a group of naff has-beens who kept lusting after glory days that really never existed. Kind of reminded me of The Wrestler.

reply

I guess it's all a matter of opinion. Anvil has been my fave since 83. I love the songs. I love to see them play live.

Bon Jovi et al don't have the great songwriting abilitis...they hire that. Desmond Child has written for many of the successful 80s bands.

Regardless...they love what they do....why pack it in? Like Lips said in the movie..it's what keeps him going. Alot of people have hobbies that are never going to make them money....so should they pack it in?

reply

I have to agree with lucius78. I love metal, and I listen to loads of old school stuff (I've been worshipping Maiden for over 16 years), but let's face it, Anvil just aren't that good, and they're totally stuck in the early 80's, in a really bad way. Throughout this film, I was constantly reminded of Spinal Tap, and that's really not a good thing.

And while old school metal is coming back in a big way, Anvil just don't have the chops to cut it. Lips, for all his endearing puppy dog-ness, is a pretty terrible vocalist, their lyrics are cringe-inducing in their cliches, and their music itself just doesn't stand out at all. They're just not a great band.

I enjoyed this film, but I found it more overwhelmingly tragic than anything else. The only reason they're being booked for gigs now is because of this film, and not because anyone actually thinks they're going to hit the big time. On one hand, I feel sad for them, but on the other hand, they're really out of touch with reality. I respect their integrity for sticking to what they love, but they can't expect the rest of the world to lap it up.

_________________________________________
cogito ergo sum

reply

There's not a single song in the whole Anthrax discography that could match mammoth-like classics as FORGED IN FIRE or FREE AS THE WIND. Imo, they were just a jock thrash band with a ridiculous Skatebwoy image. No honesty or devotion to the steel. Fistfull of Metal is pretty much the only Anthrax album I enjoy because it lacks that chest-stomping pseudo-rebel toughboy attitude. Probably unresistable band to fans of Pantera. If I wanna THRASH I listen to old Slayer and Exodus, Infernäl Mäjesty, Razor, Kreator, Destruction and so on.

reply

I can tell you in one word, two words, in three words. They didn't have good management.

reply

[deleted]

As a 42 year old I can confirm that they were certainly a buzz band back in the day. The film shows them making the cover of Kerrang and much like Metallica in 1983 they were supported by the magazine and I for one had no problems getting hold of their stuff in the UK. I think thrash killed any chances they had much like has been said already.

http://www.last.fm/user/Nearco

reply

I feel bad for them, but they really need to let the dream die. Some people just don't have what it takes. I feel more bad for their families who are being put through this.

reply

I think you miss the point. Lips says in the movie....it gives him something to look forward to. Why should he stop? He's always said that even if he doesn't make money he will continue.

Some people play golf (or fill in sport of your choice). They will never be pro. But they play because they enjoy doing so. It cost them money. So what.

reply

Also, people, remember that there are plenty of other bands that have faded into nowhere, and have had a similar fate like Anvil's. If this documentary hadn't been made, we would have never had this discussion.

But this is the one band that somebody made a documentary about, so that we can say "oh yeah, hey, I remember that name"

reply

I'm 40 and can remember all the hype around Anvil being the next big thing around the "Metal on Metal" lp from Kerrang and Sounds. They played Donington, got good reviews and it was all set up for them...then as far as I can remember they lp they made after "Metal on Metal" ("Forged in Fire"????) didn't get very good reviews in the UK and this made them lose a lot of momentum and the press started get excited about other glam/thrash bands instead, as mentioned in other posts this was pre-MTV/Internet times so the music press was proably more crucial than these days in breaking a band, and the whole glam metal thing started with Motley Crue and thrash with Metallica. Anvil were perceived at the time as somewhere in the middle between glam and thrash (altough songs like Mothra were trash songs, or something like "Stop Me" or "Scenery" could have been a Crue song) so I think they just fell into a crack in the market place and dissapeared through not really appealing to one set of fans, as I recall the whole metal scene being very polorised around that time!

"Because life is not a movie. Everyone lies. Good guys lose. And love... does not conquer all."

reply

I am starting to lean a bit on the side of they're just not really very good.

The other thing that really sticks out to me is that they were not and are not adaptable in any way, shape or form. While that could be a merit, I suppose, it is ironic that this small resurgence is going to be due to being forced to embrace another media.

Fame is Fickle. Kids don't like 10 minutes ago

Millions of bands have a similar story, although it's very interesting to see their daily lives. Sort of puts Ulrich whining about the internet in perspective.

reply

I don't think it helped them that after Forged in Fire, which was released in 1983, they didn't manage to put another album out until 1987's Strength of Steel. It's not just that there was a four-year gap there, but those particular four years were a very ill-advised lapse for a band doing the sort of music that Anvil does.

It's of course not unusual now to have a four-year gap between albums. It was unusual in the mid-80s, and those were the years when both hair metal and thrash were really starting to take off in popularity.

Re other comments about Anvil's style, yeah, they probably didn't help themselves by kind of straddling hair metal and thrash during that era. Really though, especially on their first couple albums, they're hugely influenced by Ted Nugent and Judas Priest, more or less in equal parts, and well enough that they should easily appeal to fans of both--that's what attracted me to them at the time (I'm an older dude who was in and out of a number of hard rock and metal bands myself (though that's not a genre I've worked in for some time now--I'm a huge fan of a lot of different types of music), and I very closely and extensively followed early metal, the NWOBHM bands, early thrash, etc.). If Anvil would have been better-marketed to the right demographic, they should have been more successful.



http://rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies

reply

There's tons of bands that should've been bigger. Samson, Saxon, Raven, Flotsam and Jetsam, Nuclear Assault, Whiplash, Metal Church, Diamond Head, Budgie, Loudness, Wrathchild, Dirty Looks....

"Charming company you keep."

reply

Yeah, they really are not that good. I'm 35. I remember them. I have the Metal on Metal record. I don't think I've ever listened to it all the way through in one sitting.There were plenty of other bands that didn't make it (Laaz Rockit, Gothic Slam, Accept, Lizzie Borden). Actually Accept did do pretty well, but young kids probably don't know who they are now. The only difference is Anvil kept at it anyway, and had a documentary made about them. I do have to mention that we did have MTV back then. It's just that they only played stuff like Men at Work, Huey Lewis and Madonna. Now it doesn't even play videos on the regular channel.

reply

And Tank. And Jag Panzer. And... oh well. Long, long list.

Many of these guys also blow all their money on dough, inside of capitalizing, saving for then they've faded out.

For one U2 (I happen to like all their early albums), there are 10,000 Anvils.

reply

[deleted]

Tesco Vee And The Hate Police / THE MEATMEN

WE'RE THE MEATMEN AND ANVIL SUCK

reply

I'm going to go with all of the above.

As someone growing up in the 80's who was outside of the metal scene, I can tell you that almost everyone, even if they didn't own a single metal album, was in some way influenced by the scene. All the kids then had at least a few songs that they enjoyed. Most kids in some way bought into the scene, had the accessories, or the hair, or the outfit, maybe an album.

And looking at the footage of the band playing the big concert in Japan back in the 80's, I can tell you that they seemed to have too hard of an edge without any hook that would appeal to kids who were not die-hard metal fans. Lips in his bondage harness playing the guitar with a vibrator might appeal to some metalheads, but it would just be too hard to appeal to those kids who enjoyed metal but didn't make it a way of life. And reading some of the responses here, it appears that even some of those headbangers are divided as to whether the group contributed much to the genre or not.

That said, it sure looks like Lips and Robb really enjoy what they do - that is when they're not ready to kill each other. No one makes them continue, they choose it and if it brings them joy then so be it. They really seem like two wonderful guys.


Whadda ya hear, whadda ya say!


reply

What I'm so surprised about is how influential they are, and yet, yeah, no success. It seems sad that they did, as was said, get ripped off. Other bands basically took that inspiration and left them in the dust instead of helping to promote them. I suppose thats the nature of the beast. And I think that's what really killed them. They came too early, and by the time the metal scene was in full swing, they were already lost in the crowd of other, bigger bands. Couple that with crappy management, production, etc., and you're going to have a hard time going anywhere. They seem like a band that wasn't necessarily meant for the music industry the way it is now. They have too big a heart to be involved in an industry that chews up and spits out bands like they're selling insurance.

On the other hand, at the very least these guys have had something. Maybe they're not huge like Metallica, Bon Jovi, or Whitesnake have been, but they have had some fame and certainly have fans. That's more than most bands in the world can say. They should be very proud of that fact, and very proud of themselves.

--What if Jesus was a time traveler?

reply

Or Tank. Great band. Totally failed.

reply