It says in the trivia section that Megan Fox turned down the role of Wichita, does anyone else think she would've been PERFECT in this role?!
Do guys like "the thing"?
They like it better than no thing.
Uh, no... Just no.
You are beginning to irk me, professor. I am irked, and that will not do.
no because this role calls for a little more than just pouting and looking sexy
http://ashley-in-wondrland.tumblr.com/
I would have wept. Openly.
shareNo because this is the one movie I think Emma Stone looks hot in, dont get me she looks cute/pretty in other things but she was hot in this movie there is a difference.
share[deleted]
As everyone has said, Megan would have done a terrible job as she has done in every movie she has been in because she can't act! Emma is quite a decent actor and i think she is just as good looking as Megan, never found Megan as amazingly beautiful as everyone seems to think she is.
shareby bara-no-mitsukai (Fri Oct 26 2012 12:41:59)
The role required good-looks and capable acting.
I've seen amateur porn stars with better acting skills AND looks than that thing.
[deleted]
And Taylor Lautnor almost got the role... oh god this movie was almost ruined :(
"You had me at 'hello'"
I have to admit, for most of the first half, I was thinking: this character was written to appeal to Megan Fox fans.
I didn't realise until now that she herself was actually offered it! Suddenly it all makes sense.
-----------------
Remembering Space Shuttle Columbia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERBr0lKIwOs