MovieChat Forums > Miss March (2009) Discussion > This movie didn't suck ba!!s, and that w...

This movie didn't suck ba!!s, and that was the problem


Given the subject matter of the movie, as well as that it was from a couple of the leaders of the WKUK, this movie should have had waaaaaay more t!ts and a$$. Yes, I get my porn on the internet just like everyone else, but the incredible lack of any nudity or graphic sex in this movie was disturbing. I think a lot of other people expected this as well, and this was one of the main reasons the movie didn't do well.




I asked the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

reply

You want more nudity? GET LAID!

reply

Not the point. I want my t!tty movies to actually have t!tties. This movie failed miserably.




I asked the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

reply

If all you're looking for in a movie is nudity, you're not mature enough to handle cinema.

reply

You're absolutely right, and Miss March represents nothing but the peak of cinematic excellence. Miss March is right up there with The Godfather, Casablanca, and Ben Hur. I've often heard Trevor Moore's name mentioned favorably right alongside Truffaut, Scorcese, and DeMille, the great directors of the ages.

What are you, some kind of moron?

This movie, about the search for a playmate, should have been all about the t!tties. It wasn't. That's BS. Why is this such a difficult concept to understand?




I asked the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

reply

When at any point did I say it was excellent? I said it was cinema, any movie is part of cinema! Theres a difference between cinema, and cinema excellence. Also, just because a movie features playmates doesn't mean it has to have nudity. Are you gonna go ranting on the House Bunny forums? Jesus christ, if you're that upset, you go to the Playboy mansion and complain about your problems there.

reply