The Venom movies and Morbius were all horrible and with this one apparently being the worst and tracking to bomb big, they might as well just go the Batgirl route and shelve the Kraven movie.
shareYOU SHOULD WATCH IT BEFORE YOU POST OPINIONS ABOUT IT.
shareThere is 0% chance it ends up being good. just look at the reviews.
shareFILM IS SUBJECTIVE...YOU CAN ENJOY SOMETHING OTHERS DON'T...HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
shareit is a fact this movie is terrible.
shareTHAT STATEMENT IS FALSE.
shareShut up, idiot
shareWHY SO ANGRY?🫤
shareBecause you are wrong and very stupid.
shareOPINIONS ARE VARIED ON ALL ART...FILM ESPECIALLY...WRONG OR RIGHT...YOU ARE BEING RUDE...IT IS A BAD LOOK FOR YOU.
shareRude is subjective.
shareIt's a very bad look for you enjoying shit movies like this.
shareISN'T OUT AND I HAVEN'T SEEN IT.
shareCome on Kowalski....seriously? The trailer looked rubbish and Sony Pictures make a lot of bad films especially with Marvel characters: Morbius, Venom, Ghost Rider (I think).
Even with Sweeney's fantastic jugs and Isabela Merced I'll be giving it a miss. The god awful reviews just confirmed my earlier suspicions.
I LIKED VENOM...GHOST RIDER WAS FUN ENOUGH...MORBIUS WAS FAIRLY BAD BUT HAD A FEW MOMENTS...I MAKE UP MY OWN MIND ON FILMS...BY WATCHING THEM...REVIEWS,TRAILERS AND SCORES ARE ALL BULLSHIT...AS I REGULARLY LIKE MOVIES WITH BAD MARKS AND DISLIKE MOVIES WITH GOOD MARKS.
shareI thought the first 'Venom' movie was pretty good.
However, given that the reviews for this film have been overwhelmingly negative, I'm waiting for it to hit streaming platforms before I watch it.
I'm still holding out hope for 'Kraven.' I don't think there's any reason to shelve it. Similarly, DC shouldn't have shelved 'Batgirl,' even if it might be terrible. They made it, so they should put it out there and let audiences decide for themselves.
I thought it was Sony too, but turned out it wasn't, Sony only distributes it.
It was Columbia in association with Marvel, so in the end it is still a Marvel baby.