While I get your point - if the most important thing in the Olympics was really not winning but just taking part, wouldn't they open it up to more athletes?
Why limit it only to the select few if its not really about winning?
Well, the thing is that that's exactly what they
used to do.
For many people, the introduction of the "Eddie the Eagle rule" was a watershed moment where the Olympic Games decided to move away from Baron de Coubertin's core values and concentrate more on the "winning", rather than the "taking part" of have-a-go heroes such as Eddie Edwards. The IOC did appear to have a bit of a rethink about this, though, as later changes to qualification requirements such as a wildcard system for "developing countries" allowed the likes of Eric Moussambani ("Eric the Eel") to compete at the 2000 Summer Games.
--
"So I've got bullets, but no gun. That's quite Zen."
reply
share