We simply cannot compare now with then!
We assume that they were "in better shape" because they had to do so much physical work every day; that is true!
However, they were smaller than we are; their legs were shorter so it took more steps.
They didn't always have enough to eat; there was a matter of nutrition (and that much walking, producing nothing, wasted a great deal of energy).
Notice: They did NOT have "water bottles." Do you know how thirsty they would be having to walk 8 miles each way in all kinds of weather?
Footwear! Their shoes (when they had them) were definitely inferior. They were badly made, stiff, and uncomfortable, and didn't fit well. There were many cases of corns and blisters, etc.
Many went barefoot. The roads were dirt, rocks, chuckholes, and mud puddles. It was NOT easy walking.
Walking on grass posed its own problems; gopher holes, noxious weeds, broken glass, animal droppings, and more rocks.
Walking after rain could even more difficult, depending on the kinds of soil. It could take another hour to clean your boots after a trek that long. Or, a walk like that could ruin a precious pair of boots.
Taking a shortcut could result in your being "lost" if you fell and were hurt if no one knew your exact route.
They did NOT have sunglasses! Few had "parasols." Few had proper hats. They did not have anything to sit on, if they "felt faint" for a time.
As to riding; a horse was best, but 16 miles is substantial. Poor people did not have horses; they could not afford to feed them, or outfit them. Wagons were MISERABLE. (I know what a wagon feels like with rubber tires, a wagon with wooden or metal wheels was awful! We also had a "sleigh" with metal runners, that held 9 (in 3 rows) and it was more "romantic" than wonderful.) A small trap (like Dorcas used) was OK, depending on the condition of the suspension (springs) and the padding on the seat.
I agree, the constant "back and forth" is unrealistic.
reply
share