MovieChat Forums > Water for Elephants (2011) Discussion > Should have focused more on Rosie

Should have focused more on Rosie


To me this movie had a lot of potential, but fell seriously flat in trying to portray a developing relationship between Jacob and Marlena. I'm not sure if it's the fault of the actors, the script or both, but it just didn't register for me, at least not enough for me to care about whether or not they ended up together. I'm guessing that this came across more effectively in the book, where we probably got more of Jacob's thought process and reactions. Here, it just seems to bring the entire movie to a slow crawl.

What did register is the potential for a more interesting story had Rosie been a catalyst for Jacob's growth. In other words, by getting Rosie to open up to him through communication and training (instead of sheer brutality as expressed by Marlena's husband), Jacob would understand more about getting Marlena to show her vulnerability to him. Marlena, in turn, might also respond to seeing Jacob get closer to Rosie. I think it fits, given that Jacob had completed his academic training and had experience on a farm, but obviously never with an elephant, especially one that had been abused (like Marlena, given her references to her past as well as her current situation). They kind of hinted at this type of attraction with Jacob understanding more about Marlena's horse than anyone else.

My guess is that the people behind this film focused on the relationship primarily because it's a major selling point, given Reese's stature as an actress and Pattinson's growing popularity. Too bad.

reply

I'm one of the few people that didn't get the big deal about the elephant but most people are enamored with her so you're definitely in the majority. I personally thought the love story during the 1930's had more chemistry and was more intense in the movie than in the book. I found it quite lackluster in the book on Marlena's part. Jacob was always very enamored. The reason it may seem more in the book is because the book showed a lot of the love during Jacob's reflections in the old age home. This was almost completely deleted from the movie so I think to some extent this is why it didn't work for some people. Just my guess on the matter.



http://cosmopolisthefilm.com/en
http://youtu.be/Xrwp8gxyZb4

reply

[deleted]

You're right; I think the director should've emphasised this aspect more.






Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me

reply

I enjoyed the movie, mostly because of Rosie. It would've been even better had they showed her more, but honestly I don't really know how they could've added more of her. Rosie to me was the most empathetic & interesting character of everyone in the film. I loved her revenge on August at the end!

"Are you going to your grave with unlived lives in your veins?" ~ The Good Girl

reply