I would have to agree. I've read the book a number of times and I absolutely adore it. But this film was so lacking, I not only was disappointed by the transition from paper to film, but I was actually upset that I bought this movie (and I bought it on sale for just $5). I understand that when you bring a movie to the big screen, you have to cut out a lot of details or smaller scenes that are meaningful to the readers. But was it asking too much to have more "elderly Jacob" scenes or, god forbid, the character of Uncle Al (who, by the way, brought a lot to the table- specifically Jacob's character development and the solidification of various themes- simply through his personality and reasoning)? Tack on the fact that Reese Witherspoon was cast as Marlena and this movie was essentially a complete flop. The only redeeming qualities, in my opinion, were Rob and Waltz's acting and, of course, the lovable Rosie. Other than that, watch the movie first (if you're adamant about seeing it) and then read the book, so as not to be disappointed.
reply
share