The river flows both ways... We have movies with Aussies like Mel Gibson playing the role of "The Patriot" rofl... That sort of stuff doesn't really bother me, but when the actor is portraying the most national of characters possible, and is titled as the most nationalistic USA character imaginable, and they import an actor, it makes me wonder why Mel wanted to do it... was Mel trying to make a statement? But yeah there are tons of Brits playing Americans when there are a zillion Americans available... It doens't bother me. IMO, the best actor for the part should get the part so long as the accent is believable. I guess in reality it all boils down to who looks the part the most and who's available and most importantly, who's got the right connections. Generally, you'll really never hear an American complain about "The Patriot" or similar stuff... For films like Harry Potter where Rowling said "UK actors only"... That would never fly here in the US for someone to say "No foreign actors"... it would be considered low class, like racist. My hat's off to Spielberg for telling Rowling to go fly a kite. Cast each actor for each part, and find the best match every time, disregarding things like nationality, race, social class, sex appeal (unless the part calls for it or a lack of it). Once you've become nationalistic, it's a slippery slope to slide down to racist, sexist, homophobic, etc... For a crystal clear example of this, look at how Hitler took Germany down that slope... pretty much the whole damn country.
reply
share