Honestly this movie would have been perfect without the stupid grandkid telling the story to his obnoxious classmates. It adds nothing to the story itself and it comes across as insincere. It's not like we would be lost without the opening and closing scene of him talking about his hero, Hachi.
I love this movie, but I always end up stopping the movie/zoning out when it switches back to the kid at the end. They should have just kept the perfect shot from Hachi, up to the sky/train station then put the text in at the end.
Yes ... I had the exact same sentiments. It lost a point on the IMDB grading scale because of this unnecessary, schmaltzy framing device. We didn't need it and it actually lessens the story by cheapening the entire thing.
I tend to agree, but I don't think it was the scene as much as the kid's speech that tarnished the film. "Hachi, my hero." What??? A dog can be phenomenal, your very best friend, even be your heart. But a little kid's hero? That seemed too schmaltzy and unbelievable.
If they had to show a scene like this, why not just show him telling the class "...and so, now I've got a friend a little like Hachi too." And show the kid & Hachi Jr. walk off together happily down the train track to home.
"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus." "Didn't he discover America?" "Penfold, shush."
"Hachi My Hero" was pretty cheesy. Then they show the kid with a Shiba Inu pup, who is apparently Hachi's replacement. I agree, it didn't make the film better. Maybe they just wanted a show a live dog at the end to make the ending seem more upbeat somehow.
I don't think it was such a terrible device and he probably told a more interesting story than half the babble the other kids presented. What I didn't find realistic is that his classmates a) sat through a 1 1/2 hour story without getting extremely bored because we know kids today have the attention span of a flea and b) that the teacher didn't stop him about 5 minutes in to make time for the rest of the class, which looked pretty full by today's standards.
You're absolutely right. It's pathetic that Hollywood did it only because they were afraid you couldn't handle the emotional pain you will inevitably feel. By ending the movie with the little boy walking another Akita puppy, saying "here, Hachi!", it enables the viewer to breathe a sigh of relief: "oh look! There's Hachi's incarnate . . . he really is okay!" The original Japanese version ended the film based on reality: Hachi died in the streets, The End. They did show Hachi's dream of reuniting with the professor. However, immediately following the tragic dream sequence, the screen reveals a very dead-looking dog, his whole body laid down on one side, mouth agape with tongue hanging out, alone in a cold night. The camera then pans out to reveal the lonely street, then credits roll. The Japanese movie was shot in a way that left you completely bereft, hysterically mournful, even. They dared to take that approach, and I wish Hollywood would give us the same faith that American viewers can handle such tremendous emotions.
I don't know how the kid could consider Hachi to be his hero - he barely knew the dog, since Hachi was on his own for the last 10 years of his life; the kid was a toddler when Hachi left the house the last time.
I almost didn't watch the film because I thought, 'No, it's not going to have some dumb cardboard kid in it, is it?' I only stuck with it because they moved off the kid. The kid can't act, not that he had much to do.