MovieChat Forums > Recount (2008) Discussion > Why Liberals are Stupid

Why Liberals are Stupid


Currently under construction on Avon Mountain in Connecticut (there are mountains in Connecticut?) is a house. It is slightly larger than the home built by Bill and Melinda Gates and is only 4,000 square feet smaller than the White House. It boasts a two-story basement containing a 103-seat movie theatre among other amenities. Total square footage: 50,900. It is the largest single-family residence in New England and it is owned by real estate mogul Arnold Chase.

America is the land of opportunity. You do the work and you get the rewards. Mr. Chase has done the work and therefore he deserves the rewards. If he wants to share, that’s his business. One would hope that he would have it in his heart to share some of this wealth, but there are no laws on the books in America requiring the wealthy to share their rewards with anybody – yet.

Of course if the stupid Democrats get their way, Mr. Chase will be mandated to share his 50,000 square foot house with low-lifes, bums and other social vermin.

It is the full intention of morons like Shrillary Rotten Clinton and Barack Osama-bama to take everything in the possession of the wealthy and just start handing it over to lazy, worthless, unproductive, leeches in America. And college professors backing this stupidity every step of the way. University of Connecticut sociology professor Susan Eisenhandler told the Associated Press, “Do you actually need to have that amount of space to live a good life? There are homeless people. There are impoverished people. There are serious social concerns, and we're not addressing that.”

Hold on while someone shuts off the “stupid moron” alarm. CLICK!

It is people like Professor Eisenhandler who are the ruination of America. The bleeding heart liberal *beep* is getting so deep that it’s getting harder and harder to accomplish anything in America anymore. Poverty is a choice, professor and it’s time you learn that. No doubt you, professor, are living in a two-story Colonial-style house somewhere near Storrs and you drive a Lexus SUV with leather interior to work wearing Prada shoes and carrying a Coach handbag. Your husband probably has a BMW 5-series sedan also with leather interior that he drives to his job in Hartford. Yet I don’t see you opening your home to the homeless and impoverished people of Connecticut. As Sean Hannity would say, “Professor, you’re a hypocrite!” And as I would say, “Shut your damn mouth!” The foundation of America is that anybody who can come up with the idea to make life better should be entitled to profit from his or her idea. What Professor Eisenhandler and her stupid liberal cohorts propose is socialism and communism.

Consider these questions: In what nation was the airplane invented? In what nation was the automobile perfected? In what nation was the vaccine for polio discovered? In what nation was penicillin discovered? In what nation was the light bulb invented? In what nation was the telephone invented? In what nation was the Internet established?

The answer to all of those questions is The United States of America. Not Russia, not China, not Japan, not India, not any nation in Europe. The United States of America. Has it ever occurred to anyone that the industrial revolution only happened in the last 230 years because of the innovation that was allowed to reign freely in the United States? Without that kind of freedom, we would still be riding horses, writing with quill pens and inkwells, burning candles for light, chopping wood with an axe and all dying by the age of 40 from diseases that have no cure.

It is because of the free-enterprise system of America that the entire world is a better place. Stupid liberals don’t want to believe that because they are invested in the total and unilateral defeat of America on all fronts – military, social and economic. They will not rest until the United States is the same desolate, hopeless, rundown, bankrupt nation that was once the Soviet Union and East Germany. When that happens then everyone will be homeless and impoverished. That must be what stupid liberal Democrats really want.

reply

GREAT WORK.


The complaint line forms to the left. Have a cupcake and an aperitif whilst you wait.

reply

So what does this have to do with a movie re-enacts how two political parties disputed an election?

reply

SO, I guess you must be pretty rich then...what with your I.Q. of 200 and all.

*snicker*

reply

It never ceases to amaze me how much the Bush drones buy into this "Democrats want to take all your money and property and give it to the poor" bullcrap.

Bill Clinton was president for eight years, with a Democratic Congress for part of it. How much of your property were you forced to give away to the "leeches"?

Goddamn moron.

reply

Top tax rate was raised from 28% ro 39.6%...........do you not consider that as the gov't taking more of your money???

reply

Certainly not mine, or anyone outside of the uber-rich.

Also, the idea of the government "taking more of your money" is twofold. If the government is "taking more of my money" but spending it in ways that improve my quality of life, I fail to see in any way how that is bad.

reply

The middle class tax rate got raised to 28% under clinton.

That used to be the TOP tax bracket under reagan.

Do you get that??? What used to be the TOP RATE, was now the middle class tax rate.

You don't see this as unfair ???

reply

It, truly, never ceases to amaze me how stupid and selfish people are. This is coming from someone who owes 100 k + to the BUSH ADMINISTATION in taxes. I'm not stupid nor a low-life, I simply have a soul - which many seem to be lacking. You're happy to have your tax breaks and happy life while others DIE for absolutely NO POINT in a war that the BUSH ADMINISTATION started over an election that they CLEARLY lost...you don't have to be left wing or right wing to understand how CLEAR it was that GORE won Florida, he won more than the popular vote he won the ELECTORAL VOTE, it's fact not an opinion. Can't you just be happy you got your tiny tax cut, live happy live and don't have to worry that your children will have to die in a civil war that has NOTHING to do with the USA? If we were in North Korea or Iran you'd have much more of an argument. I also KNOW very high level former BUSH administration who happen to agree with me 100%. They know that being REBPUBLICAN does not mean to hate poor people, love thyselves and get in a war (over lets face it OIL, wow!! look where that has gotten us???) Bush is such an idiot, it's so clear that everyone who still backs him has no honor or soul. Even people like Jay Severin HATES BUSH...but is still a republican...he has stated he now wishes he voted for KERRY (he may have stated GORE as well, I don't know) at least there are still some true rebublicans with true republican beliefs who put down the cool-aid and know the TRUTH.

reply

By the way Pimptaddyone...not only is your name idiotic so are you. I'm sure there would be cars, airplanes, polio vaccines etc. As a matter of fact, it doesn't matter who invented those things (thank God another country invented to wheel!!) the bottem line is how people are treated in this country - rich, poor or one of the 1000 shades of gray in-between. Your argument was competely useless, it might have been titled: This just in...the sky is BLUE!!!! Yes, it's a fact but has nothing to do with the 1,000 + pieces of fiction that exist in this country/world (and no matter what, at the end of the day, it is actually one place.)

reply

I know many conservatives, typically GOP, who also detest Bush and his policies. Bush is an idiot and everytime he opens his mouth and puts his foot in it, he proves it.

The real problem for all voters is simply that neither the GOP nor the DEM are providing the voters with decent, quality candidates. The candidates are all low down, lying, weasels, of the first order. If you could hover above the earth and look down without any opinions at all, you would see that they are all alike.

Small wonder that the concept of a third party several years ago was so popular.

reply

A very nuanced argument indeed.

reply

Liberals are mad at my wealth and jealous of my affluent lifestyle. I speak the truth about liberals and they prove their stupidity by attacking me. Damn, liberals would have us living in the stone age with their backward way of thinking.

reply

HA - Well liberals hate self made affluence. Affluence is ok to them if you inherit it and you think you can run ordinary folks lives better they can.

Republican is the party of the self made rich who know hard work and what damage high taxes and government regulation can do.

Democratic is the party of the inherited rich who think they are better than everyone else since they were born into privilege. Although they have never worked a day in their lives they want to rule everyone’s life. Perfect example is Al Gore.

reply

thats right....not only do we libs want to take all your money, but when obama becomes prez, we will lock all wingnuts in gitmo'

so leave the country now

reply

but when obama becomes prez, we will lock all wingnuts in gitmo'
I actually like that idea. Though, I don't think we'd be able to get President Obama on board with it.

reply

hahahaha

As I always said - liberals are only tolerant of other liberals. It is ok to shove a gerbil up you a-s but not to put up a Christmas tree in a public place.

Didn't all you liberal promise to move to France or Canada if Bush won? We are still waiting for you to leave!

reply

As I always said - liberals are only tolerant of other liberals.
Actually, most liberals are very tolerant of people of other political beliefs...tolerant to a fault. They are willing to tolerate all manner of put downs and slights in the name of tolerance. It is only the rare few (like myself) who have absolutely no tolerance for the behavior of right wingers and neocons. But I'm an exception. Most liberals are good people. I am not.
It is ok to shove a gerbil up you a-s but not to put up a Christmas tree in a public place.
No, it isn't ok to shove a gerbil up your a-s...it is cruel to the gerbil. The gerbil doesn't have any choice in the matter. And as for the Xmas tree, I don't have any problem with them on public property.

Didn't all you liberal promise to move to France or Canada if Bush won?
Not all of us. I don't believe in running away. Where will the neocons move if Obama wins? Iran?
We are still waiting for you to leave!
Why don't you come make me leave?

reply

Every rich liberal I meet wants to redistribute wealth, but they do not want to redistribute their wealth. You can't be a flaming liberal and make over $150,000 a year. IF you are then you are a hypocrite and just want to take others money and not your own. The surest way to convert a democrat into a republican is to make them rich. :) They will then stop their whining and vote for Bush. Liberalism is basically what happens when poor people get pissed off about being poor.

reply

Pimptaddyone - you are absolutly right. Rich liberals want to redistribute wealth, just not their own. Every state that has a "tax me more fund" or allows people to pay more taxes if they choose too, has not seen too many people volunteer. They do not want anyone to ever achieve as much wealth as they have.

It is easy to me a socialist when you have inherited millions and are sitting in some penthouse on Park Avenue.

reply

Hey, you guys sound like you are hitting it off pretty good!

Why not take a look at some of your new-found buddy's other political views. Let me know how many of these you think he is "aboslutly (sic) right" about:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0813547/board/thread/105648456?p=4

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808279/board/thread/102991403?d=107743976 &p=18#107743976

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443706/board/thread/105135233?d=107504500 &p=5#107504500

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000774/board/thread/107458348?d=107504014 %20%20&p=1#107504014

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000774/board/thread/107458348?d=107458348 %20%20&p=1#107458348

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000774/board/thread/107791344?p=4&d=1 08369642#108369642

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/board/thread/107792217?p=4&d=1 08369337#108369337

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068646/board/thread/107144091?p=3&d=1 08167074#108167074

Do you get it yet, jackass? He's just saying stuff to piss people off because he thinks it is funny (actually, it is kind of funny...he's pretty good at this).

You are agreeing with someone who is intentionally saying something outrageously untrue in order to anger and annoy people who don't get that it is a joke.

Feel like a jacka-s yet?

reply

prozac_god: Actually, most liberals are very tolerant of people of other political beliefs...tolerant to a fault. They are willing to tolerate all manner of put downs and slights in the name of tolerance. It is only the rare few (like myself) who have absolutely no tolerance for the behavior of right wingers and neocons. But I'm an exception. Most liberals are good people. I am not.


I have to disagree here. I know many a liberal who are not tolerant at all, and...from reading your posts I would say you are more tolerant than you say here.

BTW, a consider myself a repulicrat/demician. (liberal Republican/Conservative Democrat).

reply

I have to disagree here. I know many a liberal who are not tolerant at all,
They are far more tolerant than they should be.

And I should point out that telling people they are wrong or even insulting them isn't necessarily intolerance. It is rude, but it doesn't actually prevent the target of the harassment from doing anything they want to do. Tolerance is the ability to allow someone else to do something that you think it wrong. There is nothing in there about having to be polite about letting them do it: you just can't stop them or violate their right to do it.

People have become such comfortable pansies that they can't even put up with the slightest criticism of their actions or behaviors without whining about intolerance. I see a guy standing on the street with a sign that says "SINNERS REPENT!!!", and I don't knock him unconscious or lobby congress to get laws passed so that he can't stand in public with a sign. I am being tolerant. If I tell him to kiss my a-s, or complain about him to my friends at the bar that night, I'm not being intolerant: I'm just being rude.

from reading your posts I would say you are more tolerant than you say here.
I have been polite to you because you have never been rude to me. You and I likely disagree on many issues but probably agree on many more. Likewise, I have no seen you be rude to anyone else (or at least, not without being provoked). So, I see no need to be rude or insulting to you. You have my respect. Many others on this board, however, have been unprovokedly rude and discourteous, and therefore will not receive the same courtesy. It is just how I am. I cannot stand rudeness in a person, and I will not tolerate it.

BTW, a consider myself a repulicrat/demician. (liberal Republican/Conservative Democrat).


I'm too far left to be considered a Democrat. I officially severed my membership with that party several years ago. I consider myself independently liberal, though there are a few issues that would put me on the right. For example, I'm not opposed to the death penalty, and I'm pro-gun (own several guns and am an NRA member).

reply

Liberals tend to be greedy morons. They are uneducated and yet want to be rich. They whine about tax cuts for the rich, but they would take the tax cuts if they were rich. They want to redistribute wealth, but not their wealth.

reply

Many liberals seem to be educated beyond their intelligence or undereducated and think the are smart. Not a well balanced group.

reply

What does it mean to be educated beyond one's intelligence?

reply

Most liberals are stupid b/c they chose the weaker candidate over the stronger candidate in this primary season! Truly sad!!!!!

reply

Yeah, McCain will beat Obama while Hillary would make it a good close race. Hillary was stronger and she won big stats that are crucial in a general election. Damn, liberals are dumb!

reply

Hillary was stronger


No, she wasn't.

she won big stats that are crucial in a general election.


No, she didn't.

reply

[deleted]

In no way was Hillary a stronger candidate.

reply

Hillary won bigger states! She won the popular vote and she won battleground states. Obama won in small republican states that he will not win in the fall. He ran up leads in caucus states due to his supporters being young dumb kids with alot of free time while Hillary voters actually have jobs and can't stay out until midnight to do a caucus.

reply

raising taxes on the rich to pay for programs to help the poor is not the same as welfare (giving them checks, in case you didn't know)

also, the internet was established at CERN, a physics lab in Switzerland, dickweed. I'm blocking you now.

reply

The Internet was not invented at Cern. The Internet was invented by the U.S. government, while Cern invented the WWW. There is a difference.

reply

[deleted]

The Internet was invented by the U.S Department of Defense. All the anti-american whining will not change this fact. The WWW was invented at Cern by Berners Lee.

reply

You're correct, it is Socialism-the bane of human freedom and happiness.

Liberals are funny sad -and a lot !!!

reply

Hillary won bigger states!
Against other Democrats, NOT against a Republican. Why do people seem to not be able to notice this?
She won the popular vote
No, she did not. This was a lie constantly put forth by the Clinton campaign and repeated to often that it was assume to be true.
and she won battleground states
Again, against another Democrat. Not a Republican.
He ran up leads in caucus states due to his supporters being young dumb kids with alot of free time while Hillary voters actually have jobs and can't stay out until midnight to do a caucus.
Obama did quite well in several non-caucus States.

reply

It is the full intention of morons like Shrillary Rotten Clinton and Barack Osama-bama


"Osama-bama?" Real intelligent there, dumbass....

Bushbots like you are the reason why Republicans are screwing this country!

reply

Obama is a terrorist and he is Muslim. He will destroy our Christian values and make us a Muslim nation. He is not even black and is in fact a mulatto. Obama is a socialist moron who can't win in November. He was not better than Hillary and she was robbed. McCain will win since liberals are stupid. All liberals have low wealth and are not educated. Only a moron would vote for Obama, but kids support him and they are all morons.

reply

lol...that was some of your greatest work.

reply

[deleted]

Obama is a terrorist and he is Muslim.


You are without question, the biggest moron on these boards.....

reply

[deleted]

Consider these questions: In what nation was the airplane invented? In what nation was the automobile perfected? In what nation was the vaccine for polio discovered? In what nation was penicillin discovered? In what nation was the light bulb invented? In what nation was the telephone invented? In what nation was the Internet established? The answer to all of those questions is The United States of America.

Consider these answers:

Penicillin was discovered by Sir Alexander Fleming in Scotland.

The light bulb was invented by Humphrey Davey, an English chemist.

Innocenzo Manzetti of Italy is generally perceived as the man who invented the "speaking telegraph", or telephone.

The earliest-known steam-powered "automobile" was invented in 1769 by French inventor Nicolas Cugnot. But the first person to actually "perfect" one was Karl Benz in Germany.

The internet was first established by Timothy John Berners-Lee. Of England.

I'll give you polio, but Salk's fight to to find a cure for AIDS was neither encouraged, or even recognized, by Republican Ronald Regan.

And the Wright Brothers were "stupid democrats" by the way.

reply